New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
39
posted 8 hours ago by RJ567 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +39Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
PurestEvil on scored.co
6 hours ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 3 children
> Its still worth debating them. Leftists are terrified of debating.

Yes. And you know what? We can make it better than ever before. Even now people who try to disagree with them weasel around and displaying cuckish empathy, just to say how sorry they are that things are not feasible that way. Let me show you how to do it right:

She: "[Diversity is our strength]"

You: "All evidence, ancient and today's knowledge speaks against it. Even if you can prove your thesis, which is impossible, it's a recipe for disaster."

She: "So what, are you going to let them starve?!"

You: "Thank you for your suggestion."

> Worse, he became (understandably) emotional which clouded his ability to counter her.

That is the mistake, and it's not understandable. It's cuckish and sheepish. Pulling on your emotions and empathy is always what they try to do. It's like exposing your weak spot to the enemy. They are weak, they have no other way than that to destroy you.

> which she can't.

Your example isn't particularly good. It's like setting traps for a weak gotcha.

Her: "Well, there's no genetic difference between black and White people at all."

Him: "The average IQ differences between blacks and Whites are extreme. We are talking about 60 to 70 vs ~100. Do you know what that means? On a large scale it means eternal technological and cultural stagnation. It means cannibalism, tribalism, primitive and irrational belief systems."

See, this way you can express information that demolishes them. Do you think they can respond to this in any form other than "HUH?!" or "that's racist!!" In that case: "Why are ignorant about this? If you were truly knowledgeable, you would have at least heard of what I say, and have counter-arguments. Or is 'I don't like to hear this, therefore I reject it' an intellectually feasible response?"

You have to CRUSH these leftists morons to dust. Use their questions as an opportunity to convey forbidden information. When you ask them, don't just cuckishly wait for them to get into a trap that barely proves anything - ask them if they are idiots by choice (in a nice way). Make them go seethe, make them look bad.

Don't try to be "fair." Be TRUTHFUL, masculine, confident, genuine. Be prepared, but don't be rigid. Do you know what I do? I LISTEN to people, and if they are telling bullshit, I call it out. I do not just wait for my turn to speak - I bring up what they said and use it against them.
NiggerWithAForklift on scored.co
5 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Effortpost is appreciated
BlackPillBot on scored.co
5 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
I just got done watching a pretty damn enjoyable show considering it was made after 2015, and one of the characters had a great take, and brought up terms I hadn’t heard in a long time about being feeders, and receivers. We have to start living with a feeder mindset, and feeding constantly at all costs. Basically stop letting other people dictate to you, and put you in their framework. In this particular discussion we’re talking about a debate with a demon who will never argue in good faith. Never answer their questions directly. Use their questions as a way to feed more information to the third party/audience.

For example, “what are you going to do, let nigger ps starve?”

You answer with how much money we waste on them in financial aid, and welfare, among other things, and how obese they are only for them to rob, rape, and murder anything, and everything under the sun all while crying out in pain as the “victims”. Then you bring up 13 poisoned M&Ms in a bad full of 100.

This is only if you have an interested third party to impart any of this on. If not, you just point, and laugh while demoralizing the demon until hopefully it FAFOs and you can just give it a pepper bath, and/or punch it in the mouth.
PurestEvil on scored.co
4 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
> This is only if you have an interested third party to impart any of this on. If not, you just point, and laugh while demoralizing the demon until hopefully it FAFOs and you can just give it a pepper bath, and/or punch it in the mouth.

Exactly!

One time I had a conversation with a jew, who tried to explain how his people just wanted to be left alone, because these oh-so evil goyim just can't stop going after them for no reason at all. I told him some things, but essentially that the time of the jew will end soon, and the next time will be the last time.

It was meant to demoralize him. But I work towards it. He was just a JIDF, saying blabla to the non-kikes.
kalerg_plan on scored.co
2 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
Scientists don't debate creationists. Giving them time on the stage is more validation than they deserve.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
2 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Yeah, how's the credibility of the scientific community, these days?

If you can't publicly debate your opponent, no matter how unhinged, you don't actually know jack shit.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 hour ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Well, I can debate anyone on anything. I've debated all sorts of topics, even controversial here. But I don't play devil's advocate because it's gay. I mean literally, arguing for leftists is what it would entail, which is riddled with degeneracy and depravity.
Toast message