Spell casting is one of the most important aspects to understand
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
He should have stayed calm and asked her smart, pointed questions a la Socratic method instead of being shocked. If he did this she would have looked even worse because she would have had to explain herself, which she can't.
> Her: "Well, there's no genetic difference between black and White people at all."
> Him: "If you're confident enough to say that, then could you tell me why blacks have darker skin?"
Yes. And you know what? We can make it better than ever before. Even now people who try to disagree with them weasel around and displaying cuckish empathy, just to say how sorry they are that things are not feasible that way. Let me show you how to do it right:
She: "[Diversity is our strength]"
You: "All evidence, ancient and today's knowledge speaks against it. Even if you can prove your thesis, which is impossible, it's a recipe for disaster."
She: "So what, are you going to let them starve?!"
You: "Thank you for your suggestion."
> Worse, he became (understandably) emotional which clouded his ability to counter her.
That is the mistake, and it's not understandable. It's cuckish and sheepish. Pulling on your emotions and empathy is always what they try to do. It's like exposing your weak spot to the enemy. They are weak, they have no other way than that to destroy you.
> which she can't.
Your example isn't particularly good. It's like setting traps for a weak gotcha.
Her: "Well, there's no genetic difference between black and White people at all."
Him: "The average IQ differences between blacks and Whites are extreme. We are talking about 60 to 70 vs ~100. Do you know what that means? On a large scale it means eternal technological and cultural stagnation. It means cannibalism, tribalism, primitive and irrational belief systems."
See, this way you can express information that demolishes them. Do you think they can respond to this in any form other than "HUH?!" or "that's racist!!" In that case: "Why are you ignorant about this? If you were truly knowledgeable, you would have at least heard of what I say, and have counter-arguments. Or is 'I don't like to hear this, therefore I reject it' an intellectually feasible response?"
You have to CRUSH these leftists morons to dust. Use their questions as an opportunity to convey forbidden information. When you ask them, don't just cuckishly wait for them to get into a trap that barely proves anything - ask them if they are idiots by choice (in a nice way). Make them go seethe, make them look bad.
Don't try to be "fair." Be TRUTHFUL, masculine, confident, genuine. Be prepared, but don't be rigid. Do you know what I do? I LISTEN to people, and if they are telling bullshit, I call it out. I do not just wait for my turn to speak - I bring up what they said and use it against them.
For example, “what are you going to do, let nigger ps starve?”
You answer with how much money we waste on them in financial aid, and welfare, among other things, and how obese they are only for them to rob, rape, and murder anything, and everything under the sun all while crying out in pain as the “victims”. Then you bring up 13 poisoned M&Ms in a bad full of 100.
This is only if you have an interested third party to impart any of this on. If not, you just point, and laugh while demoralizing the demon until hopefully it FAFOs and you can just give it a pepper bath, and/or punch it in the mouth.
Exactly!
One time I had a conversation with a jew, who tried to explain how his people just wanted to be left alone, because these oh-so evil goyim just can't stop going after them for no reason at all. I told him some things, but essentially that the time of the jew will end soon, and the next time will be the last time.
It was meant to demoralize him. But I work towards it. He was just a JIDF, saying blabla to the non-kikes.
If you can't publicly debate your opponent, no matter how unhinged, you don't actually know jack shit.
Good practice: don't use their framing. Challenge their framing itself. Use the audience as a bludgeon. "Can you define the Holocaust for the audience and me?"
Put your opponent on tilt. Best advice ever. Get them mad. Get them flustered. But at the same time always keep your cool. The more relaxed you look, the better. Ask rude/pointed questions in an innocuous/innocent way.
I'd say "Holocaust? I've never heard of it. Do you mean the "Holodomor"?" - "Or perhaps the gulag system created by the jewish Bolsheviks, which enslaved and murdered tens of millions of White Christians?"
> Get them mad.
Yes. I see it as an art - two people debating, doing their best to make the other look stupid. There is no way I would ever fall into anger - in fact I'd rather look baffled, laugh, look at them bewildered as they say something nonsensical. But I wouldn't let them get away with it.
I saw so many debates, and none of them were truly satisfying. They required some indirect understanding of something - but I want them to go by having them deal devastating punches to the face. "I can prove that you are an idiot based on what you said here."
> You do that usually by catering to the dumbest common denominator.
I don't think that's the key, as that would make you sound stupid as well. Jordan B. Peterson in his prime wasn't about expressing stupid ideas - in fact people appreciated the profound way he expressed himself, and he did it in a way that properly conveyed the information without needlessly "over-intellectualizing" it (aka make it incomprehensible).
I personally prefer abstractions to be guided by the concrete, otherwise people might have varying interpretations of it. And I dislike obtuse combinations of words. If I give something a title, I want it to be expressive in itself rather than requiring explanation.
they're not completely conservative, but they are vehemently anti-leftist on most issues, and giga-conservative on most.
don't agree with them on everything but both of them are really fucking smart. like they had some dude on there and their combined IQ between the 3 was well over 500.