New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Whether it's the Old Testament or the New, or simply the sayings of Jesus, it's all the same old Jewish swindle. It will not make us free. You cannot make an Aryan of Jesus; that's nonsense." - Adolf Hitler "Christianity, growing from Jewish roots & comprehensible only as a product of this soil, is the anti-Aryan religion par excellence: Christianity, the revaluation of all Aryan values, the victory of Outcaste values." - Nietzsche.



The very religion which subverted and destroyed the ethos of the Kelts,the Aryan, of the Vikings, the Romans... replacing it with an alien, Hebrew ethos, has become the creed of many of those who claim to be defending the Aryan! These are the "Identity Christians", who are preaching to today's whites like the Pharisee Paul preached to the Romans. The result is again the Judaization of our folk. Nietzsche wrote that "One should not embellish or dress up Christianity: it has waged war to the death against higher man." Yet this is precisely what the Idenitity preachers are doing in selling a Hebrew creed to their folk.



Negative Impact



Whatever advances Western Civilization has made have been despite Christianity. However much Christianity has dominated our folk, it still hasn't extinguished our Faustian soul. The persecution of scientists such as Galileo, banning of books, The Inquisition, the religious wars amongst Europeans... How much greater would our Civilization have been today if not for this Hebrew swindle? Wouldn't we now be colonizing space as the destiny of our Faustian soul?



Fallacies of the identity of preachers



Identity relies much on the Old Testament in claiming Christianity as an Aryan folk religion. The Old Testament was written to keep intact a nomadic tribe driven from Egypt, in its journeying amongst many races and cultures higher than itself. The myth of "God's Chosen People" was invented to weld this mixed multitude of many races into an ethnic group. But never was it a racial religion. The Hebrews were not, and are not, a biological race. They're a mixture of many races held together by Mosaic Law. One of the favourite references of the Identity preachers is the story of Phineas killing an Israelite and Midianite copulating. (Numbers 25: 7-13). However, it can be seen by reading Ch. 25 in entirety that this was done on religious, not racial, grounds. The women of Moab were turning the Israelite men from their religion. "And Israel joined himself unto Baalpeor: & the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel. And Moses said unto the judges of Israel: slay ye every one of his men that were joined unto Baalpeor." This was a religious conflict, not a racial one. Indeed, Moses himself had married a Midianite.



Race mixing encouraged



That race mixing was encouraged to increased the population of Israel is made plain in Deut. 20: 13-18:"And when the Lord hath delivered the city unto thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof... but the women and the little ones thou shalt take unto thyself." In Deut. 21: 10-12 the Lord commands the Hebrews to take the captive women as wives. What was to be guarded against was any influence that would undermine the Jehovah cult. Another cornerstone of Identity is the 7th Commandment, "thou shalt not commit adultery." The Identity preachers claim this is a law against "racial adultery." They say the 10th Commandment against coveting your neighbour's possessions would include that of his wife, and God wouldn't double up on commandments, since there's only ten. (Ref. Verboten, Thomas O'Brien). But there's a separate commandment against stealing which, using the same 'logic', could be considered 'doubling up.' Turning to the New Testament, the intent of the 7th Commandment is made clear in Matt. 5: 27-28: "Ye have heard that it was said by them of old times, thou shalt not commit adultery: but I say unto you, that whosover looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already."



Cainites and Adamites



Another fundamental of Identity is to identify the white race as God's Chosen "Adamite race" - the "true Israelites" - & the coloureds and/or Jews as the 'Satanic spawn' of Cain. Yet it was the Cainite line which, according to Gen. 4 created the first city, named after Cain's son Enoch. This might be a ref. to the Sumerian city Unuk, with Cain himself the Sumerian King Kan. (Dr L.A. Waddell,_The Makers of Civilization). Genesis also states that Cain's descendants were the fathers of music and metallurgy. The supposed "white Adamic line" was continued through Seth, but where did it create anything comparable to that of the Cainites who were the first civilization-builders, according to Gen. Since the Cainites are supposed to be the Satan-bred coloureds or Jews according to the Identity preachers, where does this leave their doctrine of the "superior white Adamic race"?
https://kelticklan.tripod.com/id16.html
You must log in or sign up to comment
6 comments:
12
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 day ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror )
Welcome to the site. Glad you wasted two days spamming jewish bullshit that will be deleted instantly. Bye, yid.
fourleaved on scored.co
1 day ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
You sort of give the game away when you talk about the persecution Galileo and the Inquisition. Any real understanding of history would have to conclude that those were both entirely good and proper things
zk3hf9dB on scored.co
22 hours ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Galileo was never persecuted. In fact, he put himself on trial because he wanted there to be a record of the trial.

The inquisition had nothing to do with Galileo. Any worries Galileo had was due to the nascent protestant movement that he might have been associated with. He wanted to clear his name and provide other intellectuals the freedom to CONTINUE science under the catholic church despite the threat of protestants perverting things. Remember, the catholic church was funding a lot of these people doing research and experiments.
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
There is a lot of misconceptions on all sides of this argument.

1: the role of religion.

Religion at its core is a way to make permanent values that allow society to prosper. Before religion, the rule was by the strongest, for as long as the strongest stayed the strongest. Maybe the strongest was an evil selfish murderous demon, and life was bad. Maybe he was a benevolent wise leader, and life was good. Religion provides something to believe in that gives permanence to the concepts that make a good leader, and reject those that make them bad. With Religion, individuals can judge the leader as a group, and the leader can judge themselves, as there is something greater than their authority. This let's us build a multigenerational culture. It is the single greatest achievement of man, and why we have progressed at all.

2: the meaning of religion

This is where people get stupid. The STORY isnt important. Each religion is a group of stories, whether real or myth, that are meant to impart a moral code that resonates with a certain group and culture during a certain time period. Some of these stories will resonate with a lot of people for a long time, some are more nuanced and specific. Its irrelevant. The importance is the *moral*. The problem is that people get caught up in the story and its meaning, focusing on unimportant distinctions. They argue the *what* instead of understanding the *why*. This leads to conflict.

3: the subversion of religion

Any system that provides authority can and will be manipulated by people who desire it. It doesnt matter what system it is, if it provides any type of authority or power it WILL be subverted eventually. Church, bureaucracy, military, doesnt matter. Most People incorrectly equate the power structures *reason* with its eventual subversion. It doesnt matter what church it is, what the story is, or what the morals and rituals are. it will always fall to manipulation.

In short, it doesnt matter if its about christ or Thor or Buddha. If the story resonates and helps a group of people build a successful culture of prosperity and trust, it is a benefit. ALL of them will have downsides and all will be manipulated over time to a perversion of their intended goal.

There are far more important things to fight about.
zk3hf9dB on scored.co
21 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Who was Abraham? I think the evidence is pretty clear. Abraham, and his wife Sarah, were royalty from Sumeria. That's why he could walk into Egypt and sit on the Pharaoh's throne.

Abraham and his descendants are the uber-white race, the whitest of the white.

Israel was the proper heir of Abraham's blessing and race. Judah married Canaanites and so his descendants are, at best, half-breeds. The blessings of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were passed, wholly, to Joseph, who also received blessings above this.

The tribes of Joseph were eternally at war with Judah, despite early cooperation. Judah described the southern kingdom based in Jerusalem. The rest of the tribes formed Israel, the Northern Kingdom. They were carried off into captivity and never returned. Judah was captured by Babylon and a portion returned to rebuild the temple. Jesus comes from that line of people. Once Jesus came, that was the end of any blessing Judah was ever promised.

The modern-day jews have no relation to Judah or Israel or Abraham. They are mongrels. The records of ancestry were destroyed by Trajan and so no one on earth can properly claim that they are descended from Israel. We can only guess that certain groups of people are, and our guesses are tenuous at best.

I believe that Joseph forms the Northwestern European people. Probably not just the Anglo-Saxons, but probably the Franks as well (who inhabit Spain and France) if not the Swedes, Norwegians, Danish, etc... The other tribes of Israel are also present among the other Germanic Tribes. Aside from a few groups of people like the Basque, practically every European is a descendant from these tribes.

Thus, the white race, as represented by Europeans, are almost entirely Israel, while the jews are definitely not.
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Thoroughly based and true.

Stock Christianity is a universalist pacifism cult, but at least it's intellectually consistent. Christian Identity is just as harmful to White interests, but turns the retard dial up to 20. It's on the same level as flat earth and fake moon landing in terms of how much it torpedoes pro-White optics.

Pointing out that Paul is a *literal jew* infesting a White society with ideas designed to wipe out and homogenize their native culture is highly salient. There are even rabbis who consider him to have been serving God by destroying paganism and replacing it with the jewish spiritual framework.

I've said it before: Try being a bunch of jews and telling the Romans, or the Vikings, or any other pre-Christian White warrior society "Oy vey you guys are racist and bad for all the conquering you've been doing, you need to sit down and let us import a bunch of niggers into your society."

Laughable. They'd get *skewered.*

Only when they were forcibly converted to a religion that glorifies weakness and reviles the strong did all that start to change.
Enygger_Tzu on scored.co
9 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The fuck that you cited a man who spent the last 11 years of his life drinking his own piss tells me all I need to know about you and your intentions here.
Toast message