You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-1
genesisSOC on scored.co
4 days ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
So when God told White King David to mass genocide all the Palestinians and jews in 2 Samuel and 1 Kings that was "default stance of absolute pacifism?" lmfao
4 days ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
I answered your question, which was highly charitable of me considering you've been refusing to engage with my core point for this entire discussion. If you'd like the thread to continue, do me the courtesy of directly answering mine.
4 days ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
Christianity started small and was massively growing and learning. Almost all of the Apostles were brutally murdered, one of which survived two execution attempts. To think that they would somehow go guns blazing and kill everyone who disagreed with them immediately then state that's "default Christianity and the next 1800 years are false" is both asinine and retarded, it's maximum jewish subversion. That's your answer. Now shut the fuck up, admit you're wrong, say Christ is King and kill some jews.
4 days ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
> To think that they would somehow go guns blazing and kill everyone who disagreed with them immediately
You're assuming that's what they desired to do. You have no evidence of this. The church fathers I quoted are evidence against this, as they reflected what most Christians believed during that time period. There's no verifiable reason to suggest that people claiming "we refuse to use weapons for any reason" and letting their enemies kill them had a secret wish to go "guns blazing."
My point still stands that the later militarization of the religion is objectively incongruent with not just its behavior, but its patristic writings during the first couple centuries. I'm not making an absolute truth/falsehood claim, I'm saying my personal stance leans towards falsehood as the most likely explanation for that incongruency.
4 days ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
What you're doing is a personal interpretation based on jew Maxwells' false revisionist history that you for some reason still believe. Let's start with this: When did Christianity start existing? How many non-Whites were around Israel after Christ resurrected? What is a jew, and where do they come from?
4 days ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
In one ear and out the other. I just explained what my interpretation is based on. I haven't even heard of this Maxwell you're referring to.
I'm not interested in playing the "Whites were the real jews" rhetorical game. Unlike the topic of pacifism, that's a notion too absurd for me to entertain with deep discussion. The concept of mutilating your dick for God was not an invention of the White racial consciousness.
You're assuming that's what they desired to do. You have no evidence of this. The church fathers I quoted are evidence against this, as they reflected what most Christians believed during that time period. There's no verifiable reason to suggest that people claiming "we refuse to use weapons for any reason" and letting their enemies kill them had a secret wish to go "guns blazing."
My point still stands that the later militarization of the religion is objectively incongruent with not just its behavior, but its patristic writings during the first couple centuries. I'm not making an absolute truth/falsehood claim, I'm saying my personal stance leans towards falsehood as the most likely explanation for that incongruency.
I'm not interested in playing the "Whites were the real jews" rhetorical game. Unlike the topic of pacifism, that's a notion too absurd for me to entertain with deep discussion. The concept of mutilating your dick for God was not an invention of the White racial consciousness.