You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
genesisSOC on scored.co
5 days ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
>Take your meds. I didn't quote "turn the other cheek." I quoted:
This is what you quoted, retard:
>"*But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.*" - Matthew 5:39
You should learn to read the Bible before trying to quote it, faggot.
>Gimme your shirt, bitch. And your cloak, while you're at it.
Jesus says if I treat you with respect and you treat me with wrong, I should show you my angry side. So I'll just blow your brains out instead because that's the Christian thing to do. Assuming you're actually White, otherwise I'd just go straight to blowing your brains out regardless.
>Chrysostom isn't representative of the prevailing views of the early church.
You mean like how 90% of all Liturgies quote him because he created the Liturgical practice, right? Anyway here's another:
>"*Christianity did not come from Judaism rather, Judaism is a perversion of Christianity.*" - St. Ignatius of Antioch, 1st century AD
Well wouldja look at that...
>Actually... you bought into the CI scam.
How is it a scam when literally all evidence proves it and always has? Is [this](https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~royalancestors/genealogy/names/j/joseph_anna.html) a scam?
>No, because one set of Chrysostom quotes does nothing to disprove what I said.
Except it does, so you've proven you're incompetent with denial and thus lost the argument. I win. Now never speak again until I allow it, jew.
> Yeah? Well how about I shoot you in the face like Jesus totally said you fuckin' meanie?!
The moment where the Christcuck has a neurotic meltdown in the face of an uncomfortable historical mirror is as inevitable as it is pitiable. I'd find it funny if it wasn't so depressingly similar to the behavior of a nigger.
You've still absolutely failed to address the one narrow point my whole argument is dealing with btw. Why was nearly the entire early church a pacifist martyr cult, only "reinterpreting" that stance after they got massive state power?
4 days ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
And yet you're completely missing the 2000 years of militarized Christianity while throwing logical fallacies as if they mean anything. You lost like a nigger. It's why your jewish subversion is failing, Christ is King, and there is NOTHING you can do about it, jew.
4 days ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
Why were the last nearly 2000 years of Christianity militarized and fulfilled every prophesy given to Jacob-Israel through "colonization?"\
It's a simple question.
4 days ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Because after Christianity was no longer a persecuted minority, and instead suddenly in possession of overwhelming state power, their default stance of absolute pacifism became too inconvenient to maintain. So they radically reinterpreted their theology on the spot in response to social and political pressure.
Christianity has always reshaped itself like jelly to adapt cleanly to its external circumstances from that point onwards, never actually holding staunchly to a single unchanging truth system. I suppose that this is the result of base human opportunism, and soft evidence that the religion's truth claims are false.
This is what you quoted, retard:
>"*But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.*" - Matthew 5:39
You should learn to read the Bible before trying to quote it, faggot.
>Gimme your shirt, bitch. And your cloak, while you're at it.
Jesus says if I treat you with respect and you treat me with wrong, I should show you my angry side. So I'll just blow your brains out instead because that's the Christian thing to do. Assuming you're actually White, otherwise I'd just go straight to blowing your brains out regardless.
>Chrysostom isn't representative of the prevailing views of the early church.
You mean like how 90% of all Liturgies quote him because he created the Liturgical practice, right? Anyway here's another:
>"*Christianity did not come from Judaism rather, Judaism is a perversion of Christianity.*" - St. Ignatius of Antioch, 1st century AD
Well wouldja look at that...
>Actually... you bought into the CI scam.
How is it a scam when literally all evidence proves it and always has? Is [this](https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~royalancestors/genealogy/names/j/joseph_anna.html) a scam?
>No, because one set of Chrysostom quotes does nothing to disprove what I said.
Except it does, so you've proven you're incompetent with denial and thus lost the argument. I win. Now never speak again until I allow it, jew.
The moment where the Christcuck has a neurotic meltdown in the face of an uncomfortable historical mirror is as inevitable as it is pitiable. I'd find it funny if it wasn't so depressingly similar to the behavior of a nigger.
You've still absolutely failed to address the one narrow point my whole argument is dealing with btw. Why was nearly the entire early church a pacifist martyr cult, only "reinterpreting" that stance after they got massive state power?
It's a simple question.
It's a simple question.
Christianity has always reshaped itself like jelly to adapt cleanly to its external circumstances from that point onwards, never actually holding staunchly to a single unchanging truth system. I suppose that this is the result of base human opportunism, and soft evidence that the religion's truth claims are false.
Your turn.