You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
Breadpilled on scored.co
5 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
> Ah, the classic modern jewish antichrist interpretation of "turn the other cheek."
Take your meds. I didn't quote "turn the other cheek." I quoted:
> Do not resist an evil person.
Gimme your shirt, bitch. And your cloak, while you're at it.
> Then we got this guy...
Chrysostom isn't representative of the prevailing views of the early church. That's why he's the only person you quoted, while I quoted **seven.** You're telling me nearly the entire early Christian movement was full of heretics who read the truth they got straight from God incorrectly?
Actually... you bought into the CI scam. You probably do believe this unironically.
> Kinda shuts down all the jewish "pacifist" nonsense, huh?
No, because one set of Chrysostom quotes does nothing to disprove what I said. I'll say it again for fun, because it's still true: Christianity was overwhelmingly pacifist for the first 250 years of its existence.
> the Reconquista
Missed the point award.
I'm specifically talking about the foundations Christianity was built on, and the implications of that. Not what they were doing a thousand years later.
The cherry on top is that John Chrysostom himself was born in the mid third century. He can't even be legitimately invoked alongside the others in this context. And even in his own day, he was an extreme outlier.
I was intentionally isolating part of the quote to force him to grapple with it without his preloaded NPC response. So no, that's not the thing I quoted.
Jesus doesn't say "Resist strategically. Here's how..."
He says "Do not resist at all. Let me emphasize the point..."
> Physically preventing jews from behaving the way they want to behave.
Actually it's based on letting evil people kill you.
Like Jesus did.
Like those seven early church fathers I quoted all rubber stamped.
>I was intentionally isolating part of the quote to force him to grapple with it without his preloaded NPC response. So no, that's not the thing I quoted.
Neat, you purposely misconstrued the verse to serve your message. I don’t care. You were wrong.
>Jesus doesn't say
He does. The translation was provided. Christ spoke in parable constantly. You were wrong.
>Actually it's based on letting evil people kill you.
>Take your meds. I didn't quote "turn the other cheek." I quoted:
This is what you quoted, retard:
>"*But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.*" - Matthew 5:39
You should learn to read the Bible before trying to quote it, faggot.
>Gimme your shirt, bitch. And your cloak, while you're at it.
Jesus says if I treat you with respect and you treat me with wrong, I should show you my angry side. So I'll just blow your brains out instead because that's the Christian thing to do. Assuming you're actually White, otherwise I'd just go straight to blowing your brains out regardless.
>Chrysostom isn't representative of the prevailing views of the early church.
You mean like how 90% of all Liturgies quote him because he created the Liturgical practice, right? Anyway here's another:
>"*Christianity did not come from Judaism rather, Judaism is a perversion of Christianity.*" - St. Ignatius of Antioch, 1st century AD
Well wouldja look at that...
>Actually... you bought into the CI scam.
How is it a scam when literally all evidence proves it and always has? Is [this](https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~royalancestors/genealogy/names/j/joseph_anna.html) a scam?
>No, because one set of Chrysostom quotes does nothing to disprove what I said.
Except it does, so you've proven you're incompetent with denial and thus lost the argument. I win. Now never speak again until I allow it, jew.
> Yeah? Well how about I shoot you in the face like Jesus totally said you fuckin' meanie?!
The moment where the Christcuck has a neurotic meltdown in the face of an uncomfortable historical mirror is as inevitable as it is pitiable. I'd find it funny if it wasn't so depressingly similar to the behavior of a nigger.
You've still absolutely failed to address the one narrow point my whole argument is dealing with btw. Why was nearly the entire early church a pacifist martyr cult, only "reinterpreting" that stance after they got massive state power?
4 days ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
And yet you're completely missing the 2000 years of militarized Christianity while throwing logical fallacies as if they mean anything. You lost like a nigger. It's why your jewish subversion is failing, Christ is King, and there is NOTHING you can do about it, jew.
4 days ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
Why were the last nearly 2000 years of Christianity militarized and fulfilled every prophesy given to Jacob-Israel through "colonization?"\
It's a simple question.
Take your meds. I didn't quote "turn the other cheek." I quoted:
> Do not resist an evil person.
Gimme your shirt, bitch. And your cloak, while you're at it.
> Then we got this guy...
Chrysostom isn't representative of the prevailing views of the early church. That's why he's the only person you quoted, while I quoted **seven.** You're telling me nearly the entire early Christian movement was full of heretics who read the truth they got straight from God incorrectly?
Actually... you bought into the CI scam. You probably do believe this unironically.
> Kinda shuts down all the jewish "pacifist" nonsense, huh?
No, because one set of Chrysostom quotes does nothing to disprove what I said. I'll say it again for fun, because it's still true: Christianity was overwhelmingly pacifist for the first 250 years of its existence.
> the Reconquista
Missed the point award.
I'm specifically talking about the foundations Christianity was built on, and the implications of that. Not what they were doing a thousand years later.
The cherry on top is that John Chrysostom himself was born in the mid third century. He can't even be legitimately invoked alongside the others in this context. And even in his own day, he was an extreme outlier.
>I quoted [THE THING I QUOTED]
Good job. Fuck off, yid.
>the foundations Christianity was built on
# Physically preventing jews from behaving the way they want to behave.
Why can’t *you* even do that, agnostic?
I was intentionally isolating part of the quote to force him to grapple with it without his preloaded NPC response. So no, that's not the thing I quoted.
Jesus doesn't say "Resist strategically. Here's how..."
He says "Do not resist at all. Let me emphasize the point..."
> Physically preventing jews from behaving the way they want to behave.
Actually it's based on letting evil people kill you.
Like Jesus did.
Like those seven early church fathers I quoted all rubber stamped.
Neat, you purposely misconstrued the verse to serve your message. I don’t care. You were wrong.
>Jesus doesn't say
He does. The translation was provided. Christ spoke in parable constantly. You were wrong.
>Actually it's based on letting evil people kill you.
Wrong. Enjoy hell, jew.
Won’t work.
Hey there, coward! Still too afraid of me to reply directly, huh?
This is what you quoted, retard:
>"*But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.*" - Matthew 5:39
You should learn to read the Bible before trying to quote it, faggot.
>Gimme your shirt, bitch. And your cloak, while you're at it.
Jesus says if I treat you with respect and you treat me with wrong, I should show you my angry side. So I'll just blow your brains out instead because that's the Christian thing to do. Assuming you're actually White, otherwise I'd just go straight to blowing your brains out regardless.
>Chrysostom isn't representative of the prevailing views of the early church.
You mean like how 90% of all Liturgies quote him because he created the Liturgical practice, right? Anyway here's another:
>"*Christianity did not come from Judaism rather, Judaism is a perversion of Christianity.*" - St. Ignatius of Antioch, 1st century AD
Well wouldja look at that...
>Actually... you bought into the CI scam.
How is it a scam when literally all evidence proves it and always has? Is [this](https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~royalancestors/genealogy/names/j/joseph_anna.html) a scam?
>No, because one set of Chrysostom quotes does nothing to disprove what I said.
Except it does, so you've proven you're incompetent with denial and thus lost the argument. I win. Now never speak again until I allow it, jew.
The moment where the Christcuck has a neurotic meltdown in the face of an uncomfortable historical mirror is as inevitable as it is pitiable. I'd find it funny if it wasn't so depressingly similar to the behavior of a nigger.
You've still absolutely failed to address the one narrow point my whole argument is dealing with btw. Why was nearly the entire early church a pacifist martyr cult, only "reinterpreting" that stance after they got massive state power?
It's a simple question.
It's a simple question.