You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
genesisSOC on scored.co
5 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
>Let's see Matthew 5:39
Ah, the classic modern jewish antichrist interpretation of "turn the other cheek." Even Orthodox explain it never meant to be passive, but show them your other side. So if you were meek and they were evil, show them your powerful side. If you were powerful and they were evil, show them your meek side.
>Do you realize that Christianity was overwhelmingly pacifist for the first 250 years of its existence?
Then we got this guy:
>"*Should you hear any one in the public thoroughfare, or in the midst of the forum, blaspheming God; go up to him and rebuke him; and should it be necessary to inflict blows, spare not to do so. Smite him on the face; strike his mouth; sanctify your hand with the blow, and if any should accuse you, and drag you to the place of justice, follow them, and when the judge... calls you to account, say boldly that the man blasphemed the King of angels!*" - Saint John Chrysostom
Here, let me give you a couple more of him:
>“*The jews sacrifice their children to Satan… They are worse than wild beasts. The synagogue is a brothel, a den of scoundrels, the temple of demons devoted to idolatrous cults, a criminal assembly of jews, a place of meeting for the assassins of Christ, a house of ill fame, a dwelling of iniquity, a gulf and abyss of perdition… The synagogue is a curse. Obstinate in her error, she refuses to see or hear; she has deliberately perverted her judgment; she has extinguished within herself the light of the Holy Spirit… [The jews] have fallen into a condition lower than the vilest animals. Debauchery and drunkenness have brought them to the level of the lusty goat and the pig. They know only one thing: to satisfy their stomachs, to get drunk, to kill and beat each other up like stage villains and coachmen… I hate the jews because they violate the Law. I hate the Synagogue because it hates the Law and the Prophets. It is the duty of all Christians to hate the jews.*” - Saint John Chrysostom\
"*We must not mind insulting men if by respecting them we offend God.*" - Saint John Chrysostom
Kinda shuts down all the jewish "pacifist" nonsense, huh? I guess the Reconquista never happened.
5 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
> Ah, the classic modern jewish antichrist interpretation of "turn the other cheek."
Take your meds. I didn't quote "turn the other cheek." I quoted:
> Do not resist an evil person.
Gimme your shirt, bitch. And your cloak, while you're at it.
> Then we got this guy...
Chrysostom isn't representative of the prevailing views of the early church. That's why he's the only person you quoted, while I quoted **seven.** You're telling me nearly the entire early Christian movement was full of heretics who read the truth they got straight from God incorrectly?
Actually... you bought into the CI scam. You probably do believe this unironically.
> Kinda shuts down all the jewish "pacifist" nonsense, huh?
No, because one set of Chrysostom quotes does nothing to disprove what I said. I'll say it again for fun, because it's still true: Christianity was overwhelmingly pacifist for the first 250 years of its existence.
> the Reconquista
Missed the point award.
I'm specifically talking about the foundations Christianity was built on, and the implications of that. Not what they were doing a thousand years later.
The cherry on top is that John Chrysostom himself was born in the mid third century. He can't even be legitimately invoked alongside the others in this context. And even in his own day, he was an extreme outlier.
I was intentionally isolating part of the quote to force him to grapple with it without his preloaded NPC response. So no, that's not the thing I quoted.
Jesus doesn't say "Resist strategically. Here's how..."
He says "Do not resist at all. Let me emphasize the point..."
> Physically preventing jews from behaving the way they want to behave.
Actually it's based on letting evil people kill you.
Like Jesus did.
Like those seven early church fathers I quoted all rubber stamped.
>I was intentionally isolating part of the quote to force him to grapple with it without his preloaded NPC response. So no, that's not the thing I quoted.
Neat, you purposely misconstrued the verse to serve your message. I don’t care. You were wrong.
>Jesus doesn't say
He does. The translation was provided. Christ spoke in parable constantly. You were wrong.
>Actually it's based on letting evil people kill you.
>Take your meds. I didn't quote "turn the other cheek." I quoted:
This is what you quoted, retard:
>"*But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.*" - Matthew 5:39
You should learn to read the Bible before trying to quote it, faggot.
>Gimme your shirt, bitch. And your cloak, while you're at it.
Jesus says if I treat you with respect and you treat me with wrong, I should show you my angry side. So I'll just blow your brains out instead because that's the Christian thing to do. Assuming you're actually White, otherwise I'd just go straight to blowing your brains out regardless.
>Chrysostom isn't representative of the prevailing views of the early church.
You mean like how 90% of all Liturgies quote him because he created the Liturgical practice, right? Anyway here's another:
>"*Christianity did not come from Judaism rather, Judaism is a perversion of Christianity.*" - St. Ignatius of Antioch, 1st century AD
Well wouldja look at that...
>Actually... you bought into the CI scam.
How is it a scam when literally all evidence proves it and always has? Is [this](https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~royalancestors/genealogy/names/j/joseph_anna.html) a scam?
>No, because one set of Chrysostom quotes does nothing to disprove what I said.
Except it does, so you've proven you're incompetent with denial and thus lost the argument. I win. Now never speak again until I allow it, jew.
> Yeah? Well how about I shoot you in the face like Jesus totally said you fuckin' meanie?!
The moment where the Christcuck has a neurotic meltdown in the face of an uncomfortable historical mirror is as inevitable as it is pitiable. I'd find it funny if it wasn't so depressingly similar to the behavior of a nigger.
You've still absolutely failed to address the one narrow point my whole argument is dealing with btw. Why was nearly the entire early church a pacifist martyr cult, only "reinterpreting" that stance after they got massive state power?
4 days ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
And yet you're completely missing the 2000 years of militarized Christianity while throwing logical fallacies as if they mean anything. You lost like a nigger. It's why your jewish subversion is failing, Christ is King, and there is NOTHING you can do about it, jew.
Ah, the classic modern jewish antichrist interpretation of "turn the other cheek." Even Orthodox explain it never meant to be passive, but show them your other side. So if you were meek and they were evil, show them your powerful side. If you were powerful and they were evil, show them your meek side.
>Do you realize that Christianity was overwhelmingly pacifist for the first 250 years of its existence?
Then we got this guy:
>"*Should you hear any one in the public thoroughfare, or in the midst of the forum, blaspheming God; go up to him and rebuke him; and should it be necessary to inflict blows, spare not to do so. Smite him on the face; strike his mouth; sanctify your hand with the blow, and if any should accuse you, and drag you to the place of justice, follow them, and when the judge... calls you to account, say boldly that the man blasphemed the King of angels!*" - Saint John Chrysostom
Here, let me give you a couple more of him:
>“*The jews sacrifice their children to Satan… They are worse than wild beasts. The synagogue is a brothel, a den of scoundrels, the temple of demons devoted to idolatrous cults, a criminal assembly of jews, a place of meeting for the assassins of Christ, a house of ill fame, a dwelling of iniquity, a gulf and abyss of perdition… The synagogue is a curse. Obstinate in her error, she refuses to see or hear; she has deliberately perverted her judgment; she has extinguished within herself the light of the Holy Spirit… [The jews] have fallen into a condition lower than the vilest animals. Debauchery and drunkenness have brought them to the level of the lusty goat and the pig. They know only one thing: to satisfy their stomachs, to get drunk, to kill and beat each other up like stage villains and coachmen… I hate the jews because they violate the Law. I hate the Synagogue because it hates the Law and the Prophets. It is the duty of all Christians to hate the jews.*” - Saint John Chrysostom\
"*We must not mind insulting men if by respecting them we offend God.*" - Saint John Chrysostom
Kinda shuts down all the jewish "pacifist" nonsense, huh? I guess the Reconquista never happened.
Take your meds. I didn't quote "turn the other cheek." I quoted:
> Do not resist an evil person.
Gimme your shirt, bitch. And your cloak, while you're at it.
> Then we got this guy...
Chrysostom isn't representative of the prevailing views of the early church. That's why he's the only person you quoted, while I quoted **seven.** You're telling me nearly the entire early Christian movement was full of heretics who read the truth they got straight from God incorrectly?
Actually... you bought into the CI scam. You probably do believe this unironically.
> Kinda shuts down all the jewish "pacifist" nonsense, huh?
No, because one set of Chrysostom quotes does nothing to disprove what I said. I'll say it again for fun, because it's still true: Christianity was overwhelmingly pacifist for the first 250 years of its existence.
> the Reconquista
Missed the point award.
I'm specifically talking about the foundations Christianity was built on, and the implications of that. Not what they were doing a thousand years later.
The cherry on top is that John Chrysostom himself was born in the mid third century. He can't even be legitimately invoked alongside the others in this context. And even in his own day, he was an extreme outlier.
>I quoted [THE THING I QUOTED]
Good job. Fuck off, yid.
>the foundations Christianity was built on
# Physically preventing jews from behaving the way they want to behave.
Why can’t *you* even do that, agnostic?
I was intentionally isolating part of the quote to force him to grapple with it without his preloaded NPC response. So no, that's not the thing I quoted.
Jesus doesn't say "Resist strategically. Here's how..."
He says "Do not resist at all. Let me emphasize the point..."
> Physically preventing jews from behaving the way they want to behave.
Actually it's based on letting evil people kill you.
Like Jesus did.
Like those seven early church fathers I quoted all rubber stamped.
Neat, you purposely misconstrued the verse to serve your message. I don’t care. You were wrong.
>Jesus doesn't say
He does. The translation was provided. Christ spoke in parable constantly. You were wrong.
>Actually it's based on letting evil people kill you.
Wrong. Enjoy hell, jew.
Hey there, coward! Still too afraid of me to reply directly, huh?
This is what you quoted, retard:
>"*But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.*" - Matthew 5:39
You should learn to read the Bible before trying to quote it, faggot.
>Gimme your shirt, bitch. And your cloak, while you're at it.
Jesus says if I treat you with respect and you treat me with wrong, I should show you my angry side. So I'll just blow your brains out instead because that's the Christian thing to do. Assuming you're actually White, otherwise I'd just go straight to blowing your brains out regardless.
>Chrysostom isn't representative of the prevailing views of the early church.
You mean like how 90% of all Liturgies quote him because he created the Liturgical practice, right? Anyway here's another:
>"*Christianity did not come from Judaism rather, Judaism is a perversion of Christianity.*" - St. Ignatius of Antioch, 1st century AD
Well wouldja look at that...
>Actually... you bought into the CI scam.
How is it a scam when literally all evidence proves it and always has? Is [this](https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~royalancestors/genealogy/names/j/joseph_anna.html) a scam?
>No, because one set of Chrysostom quotes does nothing to disprove what I said.
Except it does, so you've proven you're incompetent with denial and thus lost the argument. I win. Now never speak again until I allow it, jew.
The moment where the Christcuck has a neurotic meltdown in the face of an uncomfortable historical mirror is as inevitable as it is pitiable. I'd find it funny if it wasn't so depressingly similar to the behavior of a nigger.
You've still absolutely failed to address the one narrow point my whole argument is dealing with btw. Why was nearly the entire early church a pacifist martyr cult, only "reinterpreting" that stance after they got massive state power?
It's a simple question.