Consume custom business cards
(twitter.com)
Heh! The scene that keeps on giving.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
28 comments:
11
14 days ago
11 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+11Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Glad it is 120p resolution, I can almost read it
Stop being a fucking greedy kike that wants all the pixels. There’s never enough pixels for your kind. 😡
😁
😁
It's not in 120p. It's adjustable to 320p, 480p and 720p if you click the cog wheel on the post and then click video quality.
Don't bother reading the 1991 novel American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis because it wasn't very good. Very shocking and funny with the gore, but a waste of time.
That said, this scene was one of the best moments in the book, set in a fancy restaurant where Patrick Bateman's "friends" are comparing business cards.
Bateman maintains his composure, but is so enraged by his "friend's" superior business cards that, for a moment while he's pretending to smile, he goes blind, presumably because of blood pressure.
So angry he went blind.
That said, this scene was one of the best moments in the book, set in a fancy restaurant where Patrick Bateman's "friends" are comparing business cards.
Bateman maintains his composure, but is so enraged by his "friend's" superior business cards that, for a moment while he's pretending to smile, he goes blind, presumably because of blood pressure.
So angry he went blind.
>Bret Easton Ellis
He's a degenerate.
He's a degenerate.
I'm not surprised.
I read American Psycho slop when I was 16 only because I wanted to know why it was being banned by so many libraries.
Typically I would have consumed something of value from the Penguin Classics list instead.
I don't recall any queer shit in that book, but yes, the author is a sodomite. 'Didn't know that at the time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bret_Easton_Ellis
I read American Psycho slop when I was 16 only because I wanted to know why it was being banned by so many libraries.
Typically I would have consumed something of value from the Penguin Classics list instead.
I don't recall any queer shit in that book, but yes, the author is a sodomite. 'Didn't know that at the time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bret_Easton_Ellis
> 1991 novel American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis
It's a great book. It's just too difficult to understand and therefore appreciate if you read it when you were 16, or if you're stupid.
It's a great book. It's just too difficult to understand and therefore appreciate if you read it when you were 16, or if you're stupid.
Ellis disagrees with you when he said his novel was mostly just attention-seeking horror slop with some commentary about capitalism thrown in.
It also had kike-slop in the novel where the main character bullied poor innocent jews by calling them names in the street < vomit >.
I agree with Ellis - he touched on some good themes of losing touch with humanity through materialism and greed, but it was low quality gore slop.
It also had kike-slop in the novel where the main character bullied poor innocent jews by calling them names in the street < vomit >.
I agree with Ellis - he touched on some good themes of losing touch with humanity through materialism and greed, but it was low quality gore slop.
He didn't just touch the theme of losing humanity; he was able to paint the most terrifying image of alienation that I've ever come across.
But it's under the surface, that's why I said you need to be able to understand it. He expresses the alienation of the protagonist in a multitude of subtle ways, it's a book with multiple layers. I believe you really missed most of it, you miss what makes it great, a bit like people who read 1984 and think it's about surveillance cameras.
There's very little gore in that book, so you mentioning it makes me think you're getting confused with the movie.
But it's under the surface, that's why I said you need to be able to understand it. He expresses the alienation of the protagonist in a multitude of subtle ways, it's a book with multiple layers. I believe you really missed most of it, you miss what makes it great, a bit like people who read 1984 and think it's about surveillance cameras.
There's very little gore in that book, so you mentioning it makes me think you're getting confused with the movie.
Sorry, but the author of the novel and I disagree with you about his novel.
The novel was banned in libraries all across the US and in dozens of countries because of the gore.
Have you even read the American Psycho novel slop?
The novel was banned in libraries all across the US and in dozens of countries because of the gore.
Have you even read the American Psycho novel slop?
Oct-7th was a Jewish funded psy op. There was no Hamas attack. There were no hostages.
The entire thing was a cover story to gain sympathy after 3 million Ashkenazi jew DNA sequences were “leaked” from 23andme that week.
The entire thing was a cover story to gain sympathy after 3 million Ashkenazi jew DNA sequences were “leaked” from 23andme that week.
Come on man. The Psyop is that they let it happen, not that it didn't happen. They knew and stood down. Then after they way over exaggerated the actions. Hammas hit military targets and took military hostages. The Israelis then air struck (some of) the hostage taking vehicles. And claimed all the carnage as hammas causes deaths.
Yeah, I hate people who are so willing to go full retard...
american psycho is jew bullshit. white men are better than this. in every way. this is a jew fantasy of what white men are. if you like this you are a mind-raped bitch. die.
I disagree because the dangers of consoooooooming is a huge problem in White culture, which is exactly what this community and the American Psycho film and novel is about.
In the film and the novel, the main character becomes so spiritually bankrupted by materialism and vanity, that he loses touch with humanity and starts killing people for amusement.
In the film and the novel, the main character becomes so spiritually bankrupted by materialism and vanity, that he loses touch with humanity and starts killing people for amusement.
It appears to be a movie that is rather a criticism than intended to glorify it. If you take it as the latter, it's on you. For me it just shows the depravity of the finance sector and the corporate culture it is tied to. It shows the depravity of a person who'd fit well into that - having the mindset of a gore-murderer.
The grotesque about that scene is that stupid little cards is what makes these people euphoric, as if these are expressions of their competence. That is what matters to them so much. And these cards basically look the same, nobody except them cares - it's as if handing out nicer cards is some kind of expression of prestige, it's something that establishes some kind of hierarchy within their group.
It's a group of people who are utterly reprehensible. They are vulgar, they pursue amoral jobs, they are non-sociable, even disgusting, and the protagonist has literal gore-murder fantasies.
This is the message the movie conveys.
While the author might have intended to portray *some* Whites as such, it doesn't really track. Because it depicts a tiny minority of people, and also some of these people are jews anyway. And what, do you think you can throw in a bunch of kikes, other subhumans and even niggers, and expect the movie to succeed? You need good and attractive actors. That's why they are mostly Whites. That's a, you could say, technical limitation.
The grotesque about that scene is that stupid little cards is what makes these people euphoric, as if these are expressions of their competence. That is what matters to them so much. And these cards basically look the same, nobody except them cares - it's as if handing out nicer cards is some kind of expression of prestige, it's something that establishes some kind of hierarchy within their group.
It's a group of people who are utterly reprehensible. They are vulgar, they pursue amoral jobs, they are non-sociable, even disgusting, and the protagonist has literal gore-murder fantasies.
This is the message the movie conveys.
While the author might have intended to portray *some* Whites as such, it doesn't really track. Because it depicts a tiny minority of people, and also some of these people are jews anyway. And what, do you think you can throw in a bunch of kikes, other subhumans and even niggers, and expect the movie to succeed? You need good and attractive actors. That's why they are mostly Whites. That's a, you could say, technical limitation.
Toast message