Interesting, I'd never heard of this guy. I've been looking into this topic for a few years now, and the covid hysteria really destroyed my trust that people in power have our best interest at heart and will us what is true. But because this topic is so taboo, I seldom get to actually talk to anyone about it, so I'd like to throw out my thoughts and hear what people think:
It now seems absurd to me that Germany would go out of their way to murder millions of people when they could instead use their labor to fuel Germany's war machine. It also seems absurd, if Hitler or a high commander gave such a mass-execution order, that they would kill these people by using gas chambers instead of just shooting them. (As I understand it, Jews wrote about a lot of comical execution techniques that were clearly false before the gas chamber narrative took hold.) I think I agree with the narrative that Germany did not order any mass-executions, and that the 271,000 Jews who died starved when the allies bombed the camps' supply lines late in the war.
I understand the narrative that the Third Reich was a reaction to financial slavery, especially after the Treaty of Versailles, as well as the general societal degradation that was happening in Weimar. I also find it interesting that I think a lot of these same things are happening today. It seems like there is an international Jewish mafia controlling the world, because Judaism is an exclusionary religion that views all others as subordinate, and they are a small minority who only survive in a country they won't assimilate with if they sow discord to keep that country from unifying. And it seems like the Germans put Jews in camps for the same reason why we put Japanese in camps, because they could have been enemies of the state.
Where I think I depart from these ideas is what looks like the commonly claimed belief that Hitler had no ill-will toward Jews and treated them kindly in the camps. If he really believed that they were destroying his country and would always put the wellbeing of other Jews before fellow Germans, why wouldn't he want to kill them all? It wouldn't make sense to kill them while he could put them to work, but if he had won, it seems like it would be far safer for his country to remove them.
I try to look at all of this as objectively as I can. I tried watching a couple documentaries about this, but it felt like it was propaganda in the sense that it was glazing Hitler rather than presenting straightforward facts, e.g. swelling, triumphant music plays when talking about something he did when he was young. I think that all world leaders do horrible things in order to further their country's interests, whether that be Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Churchill, Bush, or Netanyahu. What most interests me - and what I didn't want to have to watch the full documentaries to learn about - was the financial slavery that I believe the Nazis had as one of their core tenets. I think Neonazis say that Hitler wanted to give Jews their own country, but I find this hard to believe if they had given him so much trouble. Rather, I would think that Hitler was going to kill them after the war, but he lost, so Zionists grossly exaggerated how many Jews Hitler killed (and how they died) in order to punish his legacy, secure a country for themselves, and give themselves cover against any criticism.
This has become quite long and rambling, and I don't want to word vomit forever. Like I said, I think we do live under an international Jewish mafia. But I see things a bit differently in that this mafia could very well still exist under a different religious banner. When I listen to Nick Fuentes, I get the sense that he simply want to install a *Christian* theocracy, much the same as muslims want Islam to reign supreme. Would Christianity be fundamentally better than Judaism, Islam, or another religion? Perhaps marginally so - I think there's a reason Christian societies have done so well - but in my mind, this is not a fundamentally different problem, and it's still people wanting their own group at the top at the expense of everyone else.
Anyway, I should stop here. Thanks to anyone who read this whole thing. If you have any recommendations, I'd be interested in checking out a book or documentary that talks about the financial slavery and its ties to Zionism that occurred after World War I.
It now seems absurd to me that Germany would go out of their way to murder millions of people when they could instead use their labor to fuel Germany's war machine. It also seems absurd, if Hitler or a high commander gave such a mass-execution order, that they would kill these people by using gas chambers instead of just shooting them. (As I understand it, Jews wrote about a lot of comical execution techniques that were clearly false before the gas chamber narrative took hold.) I think I agree with the narrative that Germany did not order any mass-executions, and that the 271,000 Jews who died starved when the allies bombed the camps' supply lines late in the war.
I understand the narrative that the Third Reich was a reaction to financial slavery, especially after the Treaty of Versailles, as well as the general societal degradation that was happening in Weimar. I also find it interesting that I think a lot of these same things are happening today. It seems like there is an international Jewish mafia controlling the world, because Judaism is an exclusionary religion that views all others as subordinate, and they are a small minority who only survive in a country they won't assimilate with if they sow discord to keep that country from unifying. And it seems like the Germans put Jews in camps for the same reason why we put Japanese in camps, because they could have been enemies of the state.
Where I think I depart from these ideas is what looks like the commonly claimed belief that Hitler had no ill-will toward Jews and treated them kindly in the camps. If he really believed that they were destroying his country and would always put the wellbeing of other Jews before fellow Germans, why wouldn't he want to kill them all? It wouldn't make sense to kill them while he could put them to work, but if he had won, it seems like it would be far safer for his country to remove them.
I try to look at all of this as objectively as I can. I tried watching a couple documentaries about this, but it felt like it was propaganda in the sense that it was glazing Hitler rather than presenting straightforward facts, e.g. swelling, triumphant music plays when talking about something he did when he was young. I think that all world leaders do horrible things in order to further their country's interests, whether that be Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Churchill, Bush, or Netanyahu. What most interests me - and what I didn't want to have to watch the full documentaries to learn about - was the financial slavery that I believe the Nazis had as one of their core tenets. I think Neonazis say that Hitler wanted to give Jews their own country, but I find this hard to believe if they had given him so much trouble. Rather, I would think that Hitler was going to kill them after the war, but he lost, so Zionists grossly exaggerated how many Jews Hitler killed (and how they died) in order to punish his legacy, secure a country for themselves, and give themselves cover against any criticism.
This has become quite long and rambling, and I don't want to word vomit forever. Like I said, I think we do live under an international Jewish mafia. But I see things a bit differently in that this mafia could very well still exist under a different religious banner. When I listen to Nick Fuentes, I get the sense that he simply want to install a *Christian* theocracy, much the same as muslims want Islam to reign supreme. Would Christianity be fundamentally better than Judaism, Islam, or another religion? Perhaps marginally so - I think there's a reason Christian societies have done so well - but in my mind, this is not a fundamentally different problem, and it's still people wanting their own group at the top at the expense of everyone else.
Anyway, I should stop here. Thanks to anyone who read this whole thing. If you have any recommendations, I'd be interested in checking out a book or documentary that talks about the financial slavery and its ties to Zionism that occurred after World War I.
A magnificent man and a magnificent warrior.
I suspect his efforts made the human-soap and human-lampshade hoaxes become mainstream recognized as jwish lies.
It wasn't long ago those hoaxes were repeated endlessly by the jew.
I look forward to the day when ((( their ))) entire holohoax becomes a mainstream source of ridicule for ((( them ))) too.
---------------------------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Irving