13 days ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)3 children
Are they promoted among young Catholics or are they marginalized and fringe?
Because my present day criticism of Catholicism is because of stuff like this:
Read The Script, Faggot. VATICAN CITY — Pope Leo XIV Condemns Rise of Antisemitism, On 60th Anniversary of Church Declaration https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARK5A8kkO/read-the-script-faggot--vatican-/c
In my view the Vatican was quietly taken over in the 20th century with non-Catholics becoming "clergy"; around the time of Vatican 2 they got to implement their revolution against Catholicism as though it was coming from "Catholic authority" (they elected a "pope" of their own)
They then basically banned or "reassigned" or suppressed any voices like +Williamson. +Williamson was "excommunicated" for "schism" for being consecrated as bishop without papal permission in the SSPX. The SSPX needed bishops to continue its mission and the Vatican was trying to deny them and kill off "traditionalists". I get the impression the SSPX was "controlled" and not a genuine resistance and probably set up that whole drama to "lead Catholics in to schism".
So, not surprising "pope Leo" is "condemning a rise of antisemitism" instead of doing something like condemn the rise of Communism today. Very telling what he chooses to focus on and prioritize
Depends on the Catholic you talk to. If it's a traditional he'll ignore faggotry. Interestingly there was a Marian apparition in La Sallette in 1846 where the Holy Mother warned us before the great chastisement we would have two Anti-Popes. By my calculations this is the second.
got an email back from him (or those helping him) about the state of the Church just some days before he died
The hardline sedevacantists consider only sedevacantists to be Catholic. I noticed a few not-so-hardline sedevacantists or sedeprivationists were arguing that there may be Catholics in the Vatican 2 church because they have no intention of being heretics or schismatics but are simply following the Vatican 2 church because they genuinely (but erroneously from the sedevacantist viewpoint) think this is the Catholic Church without qualification. He seemed to agree with this position that there are probably Catholics in the Vatican 2 church, and did not take the sedevacantist position.
Regarding how "redpilled" he was, he's pretty much conpro's /ourguy/ as he was fined for "denying the holocaust" in some censored State (much publicized)
Because my present day criticism of Catholicism is because of stuff like this:
Read The Script, Faggot. VATICAN CITY — Pope Leo XIV Condemns Rise of Antisemitism, On 60th Anniversary of Church Declaration https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARK5A8kkO/read-the-script-faggot--vatican-/c
They then basically banned or "reassigned" or suppressed any voices like +Williamson. +Williamson was "excommunicated" for "schism" for being consecrated as bishop without papal permission in the SSPX. The SSPX needed bishops to continue its mission and the Vatican was trying to deny them and kill off "traditionalists". I get the impression the SSPX was "controlled" and not a genuine resistance and probably set up that whole drama to "lead Catholics in to schism".
So, not surprising "pope Leo" is "condemning a rise of antisemitism" instead of doing something like condemn the rise of Communism today. Very telling what he chooses to focus on and prioritize