faggots
(twitter.com)
> This is a CHRISTIAN University.
lol
/u/genesisSOC come explain this.
lol
/u/genesisSOC come explain this.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
79 comments:
eh, i'll take over.
it's a satanic university, not a Christian one. reading the Bible which has been well-defined for thousands of years (barring retarded arguments you may attempt to make about how modern manipulations are somehow signs of poor definition) will make you come to the conclusion that killing unborn babies is generally capital B Bad.
therefore the only way for someone to be alright with that would be to worship satan, who has been associated with child sacrifice since his discovery.
it's a satanic university, not a Christian one. reading the Bible which has been well-defined for thousands of years (barring retarded arguments you may attempt to make about how modern manipulations are somehow signs of poor definition) will make you come to the conclusion that killing unborn babies is generally capital B Bad.
therefore the only way for someone to be alright with that would be to worship satan, who has been associated with child sacrifice since his discovery.
You know… constantly saying everything like this is “not real” is starting to sound a hell of a lot like the “it’s not real communism” argument that commies make every single time.
Are there any based Christian universities or all of them “satanic” and “fake”? What good is the belief if everything they’re doing is subverted and fake?
Are there any based Christian universities or all of them “satanic” and “fake”? What good is the belief if everything they’re doing is subverted and fake?
as someone on this forum you should know well the difference between a rat and a horse, and how a rat born in a stable is still not a horse. a jew who claims to be White is not so, because he is a jew. a dot indian who claims to be European or American is not so, because he is an indian. a satanist who claims to be Christian is not so, because he is a satanist. to deny the last one because you so desperately want to deny Christ is to topple the whole worldview that brought you here.
Sure, but you should know that if 95% of a religions followers are completely cucked, then it’s a failed religion.
The same way you don’t suddenly love blacks because 5% of them can be decent people.
The same way you don’t suddenly love blacks because 5% of them can be decent people.
Tries to compare 200 year old kike communism to 2000+ year old Christendom...
The last based Christian university was National Socialist Germany, and you can see what an amazing mix of Arthurian legend and Christian myth can accomplish. Using Christianity as the grounding moral system and NatSoc as the scaffolding, the White race produced the last true Knights to have ever walked this Earth.
One country challenged the entire norther hemisphere of the world and almost won. It did this with good Christian White people. And these good Christian White people embraced NatSoc.
To your credit, Adolf Hitler himself made distinctions between good/bad Christians, even going so far as we do today in comparing "old" with the subverted "new":
*"And the founder of Christianity made no secret indeed of his estimation of the Jewish people. When He found it necessary, He drove those enemies of the human race out of the Temple of God; because then, as always, they used religion as a means of advancing their commercial interests. But at that time Christ was nailed to the Cross for his attitude towards the Jews; **whereas our modern Christians enter into party politics and when elections are being held they debase themselves to beg for Jewish votes. They even enter into political intrigues with the atheistic Jewish parties against the interests of their own Christian nation**."* - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 11
Your skepticism... if it even is that, of Christianity is nothing new, and was shared by the founder of NatSoc himself. But, in the end, he considered himself a Christian warrior, wrote about the compatibility and comparisons of NatSoc and Christianity and openly praised the teachings of the religion, even if only for the moral underpinnings it delivered:
*"The more abstractly correct and hence powerful this idea will be, the more impossible remains its complete fulfillment as long as it continues to depend on human beings... If this were not so, the founders of religion could not be counted among the greatest men of this earth... In its workings, even the religion of love is only the weak reflection of the will of its exalted founder; its significance, however, lies in the direction which it attempted to give to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality."* - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 3
The last based Christian university was National Socialist Germany, and you can see what an amazing mix of Arthurian legend and Christian myth can accomplish. Using Christianity as the grounding moral system and NatSoc as the scaffolding, the White race produced the last true Knights to have ever walked this Earth.
One country challenged the entire norther hemisphere of the world and almost won. It did this with good Christian White people. And these good Christian White people embraced NatSoc.
To your credit, Adolf Hitler himself made distinctions between good/bad Christians, even going so far as we do today in comparing "old" with the subverted "new":
*"And the founder of Christianity made no secret indeed of his estimation of the Jewish people. When He found it necessary, He drove those enemies of the human race out of the Temple of God; because then, as always, they used religion as a means of advancing their commercial interests. But at that time Christ was nailed to the Cross for his attitude towards the Jews; **whereas our modern Christians enter into party politics and when elections are being held they debase themselves to beg for Jewish votes. They even enter into political intrigues with the atheistic Jewish parties against the interests of their own Christian nation**."* - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 11
Your skepticism... if it even is that, of Christianity is nothing new, and was shared by the founder of NatSoc himself. But, in the end, he considered himself a Christian warrior, wrote about the compatibility and comparisons of NatSoc and Christianity and openly praised the teachings of the religion, even if only for the moral underpinnings it delivered:
*"The more abstractly correct and hence powerful this idea will be, the more impossible remains its complete fulfillment as long as it continues to depend on human beings... If this were not so, the founders of religion could not be counted among the greatest men of this earth... In its workings, even the religion of love is only the weak reflection of the will of its exalted founder; its significance, however, lies in the direction which it attempted to give to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality."* - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 3
>[actions taken that are the diametric opposite of the ideology]
>NOOOOOOOO IT’S THE IDEOLOGY BECAUSE THEY *SAY* IT’S THE IDEOLOGY
>MEN ARE WOMEN BECAUSE THEY SAY THEY ARE
>FAGGOTS ARE SANE BECAUSE THEY SAY THEY ARE
>BLACKS ARE EQUAL TO WHITES BECAUSE THEY SAY THEY ARE
>CHILDFUCKERS CAN’T HELP IT BECAUSE THEY SAY THEY CAN’T
>WHATEVER ANYONE SAYS IS REAL SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY SAY SO
>THERE ARE NO OBJECTIVE, EXTERNAL METRICS BY WHICH TO JUDGE THINGS
Ah, yes, I had forgotten why I disliked your jewish ass.
>NOOOOOOOO IT’S THE IDEOLOGY BECAUSE THEY *SAY* IT’S THE IDEOLOGY
>MEN ARE WOMEN BECAUSE THEY SAY THEY ARE
>FAGGOTS ARE SANE BECAUSE THEY SAY THEY ARE
>BLACKS ARE EQUAL TO WHITES BECAUSE THEY SAY THEY ARE
>CHILDFUCKERS CAN’T HELP IT BECAUSE THEY SAY THEY CAN’T
>WHATEVER ANYONE SAYS IS REAL SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY SAY SO
>THERE ARE NO OBJECTIVE, EXTERNAL METRICS BY WHICH TO JUDGE THINGS
Ah, yes, I had forgotten why I disliked your jewish ass.
Noooo, it's not *real* Christianity!
The purpose of a system isn't what it does, it's what I say it *should* do!
The purpose of a system isn't what it does, it's what I say it *should* do!
That's the argument we use for communism. You can't apply it to Christianity, though the churches don't know the first thing about the book.
Here is something I've shared recently regarding treating your neighbor as yourself, which I'll just paste: Fun fact, Christ was quoting the Old Testament, which defines neighbor as your own people, through a Hebrew parallelism (two phrases that mean the same thing). Show that to a church-goer xD.
"18 You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself" (Leviticus 19)
If you're bored and fully white (to the best of your knowledge), I'd recommend giving this a listen, or search any topic and find one: https://christogenea.org/podcasts/community/christian-outreach/william-finck-jermwarfare-ukcolumn-biblical-history-jews
Also, page 6 covers this topic in more depth: https://media.christogenea.org/system/files/resources/Against_Heresies_Handbook_CI_No_Highlights.pdf
Here is something I've shared recently regarding treating your neighbor as yourself, which I'll just paste: Fun fact, Christ was quoting the Old Testament, which defines neighbor as your own people, through a Hebrew parallelism (two phrases that mean the same thing). Show that to a church-goer xD.
"18 You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself" (Leviticus 19)
If you're bored and fully white (to the best of your knowledge), I'd recommend giving this a listen, or search any topic and find one: https://christogenea.org/podcasts/community/christian-outreach/william-finck-jermwarfare-ukcolumn-biblical-history-jews
Also, page 6 covers this topic in more depth: https://media.christogenea.org/system/files/resources/Against_Heresies_Handbook_CI_No_Highlights.pdf
> though the churches don't know the first thing about the book.
The irony here is more painful than it is funny, considering that you're seriously trying to tell me that Christ defined "neighbor" as being exclusive to racial kin.
**He literally says the opposite. Very explicitly:**
> 25 On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
> 26 “What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”
> 27 He answered, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’[c]; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[d]”
> 28 “You have answered correctly,” Jesus replied. “Do this and you will live.”
> 29 But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”
> 30 In reply Jesus said: “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. 31 A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. 32 So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. 33 But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. 34 He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to an inn and took care of him. 35 The next day he took out two denarii[e] and gave them to the innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’
> 36 “Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”
> 37 The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.”
> Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”
Do you notice how I never need to link to external walls of text written by copium junkies in order to make my arguments? I literally just quote the Bible. I understand your religion better than you, which is why I do not practice it.
The irony here is more painful than it is funny, considering that you're seriously trying to tell me that Christ defined "neighbor" as being exclusive to racial kin.
**He literally says the opposite. Very explicitly:**
> 25 On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
> 26 “What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”
> 27 He answered, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’[c]; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[d]”
> 28 “You have answered correctly,” Jesus replied. “Do this and you will live.”
> 29 But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”
> 30 In reply Jesus said: “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. 31 A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. 32 So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. 33 But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. 34 He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to an inn and took care of him. 35 The next day he took out two denarii[e] and gave them to the innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’
> 36 “Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”
> 37 The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.”
> Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”
Do you notice how I never need to link to external walls of text written by copium junkies in order to make my arguments? I literally just quote the Bible. I understand your religion better than you, which is why I do not practice it.
What do you believe your argument is here? Your interpretation of the text isn't infallible nor definitive, and this likely isn't making the point you think it is because it's a parable about behavior.
What society would YOU rather live in: Fake christianity? The jew? Or the merciful brotherhood of Christ?
> I understand your religion better than you, which is why I do not practice it.
Hmmmmmm
What society would YOU rather live in: Fake christianity? The jew? Or the merciful brotherhood of Christ?
> I understand your religion better than you, which is why I do not practice it.
Hmmmmmm
I'm not interpreting the text. I'm showing you what it says. The way in which it naturally supports my position is about as subtle as a flashing neon billboard, but sure, I'll spell it out.
The entire moral lynchpin of the parable of the good Samaritan is that "neighbor" transcends racial boundaries. "Neighbor" is the person in front of you, with particular reference to *physical proximity.* The man (going from *Jerusalem to Jericho)* is strongly implied to be jewish. The entire reason that the Samaritan's charity is so charged is because he is extending it to a racial outsider, and one he has natural cause to be hostile towards at that.
Jesus himself would *rebuke* you for thinking you can shrink the definition of neighbor to just your racial kin. You are morally bound by your own faith to give of yourself to *anyone* in need, regardless of how they ended up in your path.
Seriously, you people can parse that the messaging in Hollywood media products is pozzed, but not this shit?
> What society would YOU rather live in: Fake christianity? The jew? Or the merciful brotherhood of Christ?
We're currently living all of the above simultaneously. All the Catholic beaners and Christian Haitians entering your country are your brothers in Christ by definition, per Galatians 3:28.
The entire moral lynchpin of the parable of the good Samaritan is that "neighbor" transcends racial boundaries. "Neighbor" is the person in front of you, with particular reference to *physical proximity.* The man (going from *Jerusalem to Jericho)* is strongly implied to be jewish. The entire reason that the Samaritan's charity is so charged is because he is extending it to a racial outsider, and one he has natural cause to be hostile towards at that.
Jesus himself would *rebuke* you for thinking you can shrink the definition of neighbor to just your racial kin. You are morally bound by your own faith to give of yourself to *anyone* in need, regardless of how they ended up in your path.
Seriously, you people can parse that the messaging in Hollywood media products is pozzed, but not this shit?
> What society would YOU rather live in: Fake christianity? The jew? Or the merciful brotherhood of Christ?
We're currently living all of the above simultaneously. All the Catholic beaners and Christian Haitians entering your country are your brothers in Christ by definition, per Galatians 3:28.
See, you assume they're different races here, but this example is about class distinctions. You'd know that if you looked at the greater context of Scripture and contemporary history.
To use another example to see what you're doing wrong, read all of Acts 10, summarize it, then try telling me Peter's vision made pork clean. It's impossible once you consider the greater context. It's using Peter's hunger as an allegory for people, where God made all dispersed Israelites clean.
I would highly recommend this podcast https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/biblical-exegesis-revisited
To use another example to see what you're doing wrong, read all of Acts 10, summarize it, then try telling me Peter's vision made pork clean. It's impossible once you consider the greater context. It's using Peter's hunger as an allegory for people, where God made all dispersed Israelites clean.
I would highly recommend this podcast https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/biblical-exegesis-revisited
> That's the argument we use for communism.
See, all you have to do is to listen to communists what they are saying and doing *right now*. So what the fuck do I care that it wasn't ***real*** communism if they want to genocide, niggerize, mongrelize and faggotize us anyway? It means whatever was "fake" communism was STILL better than whatever they propose today. We already *know* what horror shitshow dystopia they want to manifest and work towards. The economic side doesn't even matter at that point - if they'd argue an ethnic homogeneous communist system, I'd say fine, let's talk. But if their first step is my extinction, there is nothing to even consider.
You can't talk your way out of a brown bear that wants to kill and eat you. You fight, flee, intimidate it - or you die.
> You can't apply it to Christianity
But you can. The problem is however that if Christianity is practiced and perpetuated in a bad way for ages, and most people believe it works as it should, at some point you have to acknowledge that that is how it is. You can call it "fake", and argue that there is a real version of it, but
There is a version like Positives Christentum, but you have to acknowledge that it would be a different denomination, something that would change as it is. And also that many people would resist it simply because they grow up as they did and do not want to change.
See, all you have to do is to listen to communists what they are saying and doing *right now*. So what the fuck do I care that it wasn't ***real*** communism if they want to genocide, niggerize, mongrelize and faggotize us anyway? It means whatever was "fake" communism was STILL better than whatever they propose today. We already *know* what horror shitshow dystopia they want to manifest and work towards. The economic side doesn't even matter at that point - if they'd argue an ethnic homogeneous communist system, I'd say fine, let's talk. But if their first step is my extinction, there is nothing to even consider.
You can't talk your way out of a brown bear that wants to kill and eat you. You fight, flee, intimidate it - or you die.
> You can't apply it to Christianity
But you can. The problem is however that if Christianity is practiced and perpetuated in a bad way for ages, and most people believe it works as it should, at some point you have to acknowledge that that is how it is. You can call it "fake", and argue that there is a real version of it, but
There is a version like Positives Christentum, but you have to acknowledge that it would be a different denomination, something that would change as it is. And also that many people would resist it simply because they grow up as they did and do not want to change.
> See, all you have to do is to listen to communists what they are saying and doing right now. So what the fuck do I care that it wasn't real communism if they want to genocide, niggerize, mongrelize and faggotize us anyway?
Literally can do the same thing about Christianity. What are they doing today? Being a bunch of cucks. Case in point, nuff said.
Literally can do the same thing about Christianity. What are they doing today? Being a bunch of cucks. Case in point, nuff said.
You're not wrong about communism. The difference is that you can see that Scripture tells the future before it happens, and we can prove it with history and archaeology to see these things were written before it happened, and with this we should know that God is true. We shouldn't be using it to try to tell the future, which some like to do.
The Israelites, our white ancestors, failed to keep their covenant with God. If they couldn't follow the law, how can we?
Anyways, I don't consider myself very good at explaining things. I'll leave you with a podcast on biblical exegesis, which is a method to interpret Scripture, and a huge series on the protocols and how they've been effected in the world.
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/biblical-exegesis-revisited
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/historical/protocols
The Israelites, our white ancestors, failed to keep their covenant with God. If they couldn't follow the law, how can we?
Anyways, I don't consider myself very good at explaining things. I'll leave you with a podcast on biblical exegesis, which is a method to interpret Scripture, and a huge series on the protocols and how they've been effected in the world.
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/biblical-exegesis-revisited
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/historical/protocols
lol, it’s funny how we thought the same exact thing.
That just goes to validate what we’re all seeing.
You guys need to stop coping and just accept the facts. I’m sorry, but the truth is rarely pleasant.
That just goes to validate what we’re all seeing.
You guys need to stop coping and just accept the facts. I’m sorry, but the truth is rarely pleasant.
>men are women because they say they are
>objective definitions don’t exist
Yep, kill yourself, jew.
>objective definitions don’t exist
Yep, kill yourself, jew.
If this rhetorical phrase about systems is applied to virtually anything else, you accept it without hesitation (it's why we know voting is fake and gay.)
But point out how it applies to Christianity in *spades?* **Triggered.**
But point out how it applies to Christianity in *spades?* **Triggered.**
Get ready for a schizophrenic wall of text….
Look how they immediately face away from the man with the clipboard and look down. They know they're full of shit and they fell for it.
Then they *literally run away* while turning it into a joke ("puppies are cuter!") almost as if to say to themselves "See, I'm not a walking contradiction! This is all stupid and pointless anyways!". All of it to protect their ego.
Then they *literally run away* while turning it into a joke ("puppies are cuter!") almost as if to say to themselves "See, I'm not a walking contradiction! This is all stupid and pointless anyways!". All of it to protect their ego.
Abortion for puppies is just, as man has dominion.
Abortion of a human is specifically commanded against in Genesis 9:6. The punishment is death for a murderer.
6- Whosoever shall shed man's blood, his blood shall be shed: for man was made to the image of God [Genesis 9:6]
Abortion of a human is specifically commanded against in Genesis 9:6. The punishment is death for a murderer.
6- Whosoever shall shed man's blood, his blood shall be shed: for man was made to the image of God [Genesis 9:6]
Why would you allow your daughter or girlfriend or sister to walk around in shorts so short that it appears she has no pants on? In public? She's trying to attract male attention by appearing she only needs to bend over to get fucked. And White people allow this? Or pretend it is okay?
> Notre Dame has student-led organizations for LGBTQ+ individuals, including the undergraduate group PrismND and the graduate group GlassND. The university officially states that LGBTQ+ students "must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity". In addition to student groups, there is an official campus ministry for LGBTQ+ people with various activities, including faith-sharing groups and a retreat, notes this Campus Ministry page.
It's not strange at all. The devil has infiltrated the church and is deceiving most of the laity. Why wouldn't the colleges be infiltrated?
It's not strange at all. The devil has infiltrated the church and is deceiving most of the laity. Why wouldn't the colleges be infiltrated?
Toast message
They didn't come back any more Christian and all they got was a degree from an institution no employer respects.
Their parents would have done better buying their dream car and road tripping the nation.
If your kid isn't at risk of being gay, send them to a regular university.
... sadly, that's not really the reality. Christian colleges, from what I'm told, are more like a Christian "day care" for parents who don't feel safe sending their children to "regular" schools. And aren't they "regular" schools already, seeing as they have QWERTY++ groups and all the other Socialist propaganda that goes along with it those death cults?
Use the money you would have spent on college as down payment for a house.