faggots
(twitter.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
It does.
>How about you address the text I actually quoted
I did.
>instead of referencing a verse that doesn't even exist?
[Shoot yourself, jew.](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%2012&version=KJV)
>Having then **gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us**, whether prophecy, let us prophesy according to the proportion of faith… **Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love**; in honour preferring one another;
The crux of this is that you’re pretending (like every jew does) that we have to treat nonbelievers the same as believers.
>It only takes a single one of them who passes the rubric of Christian charity (and they do exist, particularly among beaners) to render this point inert.
lol, *“he raped fifty children but then he gave to charity so it’s okay!”* No one will ever believe that bullshit.
Ad nauseum.
> I did.
You didn't. *I am challenging you to address the parable of the good Samaritan, without fleeing into abstract rhetoric.*
> Shoot yourself jew.
*Who's* being jewy with phonetics? If you were confident in your position, you would've quoted the verse outright instead of grossly reframing the wording and then presenting it as a direct quote.
> The crux of this is that you’re pretending (like every jew does) that we have to treat nonbelievers the same as believers.
I have no idea how tf you came to this conclusion. I'm talking about racial implications *among* believers.
Even if you can make the argument that believers of your own race are closer to you in worth and duty than believers of other races (which I do lend some level of exegetical legitimacy to,) the fact that you have to consider nons "spiritual brothers" under a single banner is a huge problem in itself. And the overwhelming majority of Christians don't even bother with that distinction.
It also doesn't free you from Jesus's teaching to help anyone in need that you find before you, race notwithstanding. The very same chapter you linked includes:
> 19 Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
> 20 Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head.
.
> lol, “he raped fifty children but then he gave to charity so it’s okay!” No one will ever believe that bullshit.
Non sequitur. Even if those peoples as a whole are wicked, there *are* non European Christians who have lived lives well enough in line with Christ's teachings that you can't just hand wave them all away as subhuman monsters.
And if you insist on the Christian framework, you don't get to derisively dismiss the "not all X" argument. Christianity is *built* on drawing attention to the outliers, and elevating them as worthy of God's grace.
It’s not working, jew.
>you would have quoted the verse outright
Did that. Linked directly to it. It’s not working, jew.
> I'm talking about racial implications among believers.
There is no mandate to allow infinity browns into our country. It doesn’t exist. You need to get over it.
> the fact that you have to consider nons "spiritual brothers"
# WHERE. DOES. YOUR. BROTHER. LIVE? DOES. HE. LIVE. IN. YOUR. HOUSE? DOES. HE. EAT. YOUR. FOOD? DOES. HE. MAKE. YOUR. DECISIONS?
There is no problem. There is just you. And your lies.
>It also doesn't free you from Jesus's teaching to help anyone in need that you find before you
Psst. I find my race before me.
> Non sequitur
Direct example.
>there are non European Christians who have lived lives well enough in line with Christ's teachings that you can't just hand wave them all away as subhuman monsters.
Okay? They’re not coming into my country, though. I don’t have to let them in.
>And if you insist on the Christian framework, you don't get to derisively dismiss the "not all X" argument.
I do, yeah. I don’t have to accept any fallacy from any source.
> It’s not working, jew.
So you concede that you are unable to articulate how the parable of the good Samaritan supports your view without ignoring it in favor of completely different verses?
> Did that. Linked directly to it. It’s not working, jew.
The fuck you did. You said: “Embrace your neighbor as your brother," and did not link to the actual verse until I called it out. I can only assume this is because the actual wording doesn't slot into your ethnocentric rhetoric quite as cleanly. No other reason to paraphrase it to the point of disfigurement and present it as a direct quote.
> There is no mandate to allow infinity browns into our country. It doesn’t exist. You need to get over it.
There is no mandate to remove them, either. Unless, of course, you can get the governing authorities to create one. That is your only recourse as a Christian; Paul is *explicit* about that.
But I'm sure *you* of all people are well aware that will never happen.
> [sperg out]
Key word: Spiritual. It's an optical problem of how this causes the *average* Christian (read: basically all of them) to perceive nons.
As to your point—in your house? Not in every case. But in communal proximity to you? You betcha. That's true of my real life siblings.
> Psst. I find my race before me.
And all the other races.
Even as Jesus was surrounded by his kin, claiming to have come for the lost sheep of Israel, he didn't withhold charity nor miracles to any of the other peoples who came before him. Would he pardon you for withholding your own gifts?
> 46 While Jesus was still talking to the crowd, his mother and brothers stood outside, wanting to speak to him. 47 Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to speak to you.”
> 48 He replied to him, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” 49 Pointing to his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers. 50 For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.”
.
> Okay? They’re not coming into my country, though. I don’t have to let them in.
Many of them are already here. Legally, in fact.
> I do, yeah. I don’t have to accept any fallacy from any source.
Sure, that's literally true (putting aside that it's not a fallacy in this context,) but it flies in the face of your spiritual philosophy to do so. That's my point.
Irony.
>you are unable to articulate
*“NOOOOOO I DON’T LIKE HOW YOU DID IT THEREFORE YOU DIDN’T DO IT!”*
>completely different verses
You mean the verses that talk about the same topic?
>The fuck you did. You said: “Embrace your neighbor as your brother," and did not link to the actual verse until I called it out.
>until
Thanks for admitting I did it.
>I can only assume this is because the actual wording doesn't slot into your ethnocentric rhetoric quite as cleanly.
The actual wording which says exactly what I said it said, you mean?
>No other reason to paraphrase it to the point of disfigurement
Translation: “NOOOOOOOO I MISREPRESENTED YOUR RELIGION AND YOU CALLED ME OUT ON IT HOW DARE YOU SUMMARIZE IN THE SAME WAY I DID!”
>There is no mandate to remove them, either.
There is, yeah.
>Unless, of course, you can get the governing authorities to create one. That is your only recourse as a Christian
lol, imagine actually thinking anyone’s going to fall for that.
>[sperg out]
Thanks for conceding that you can’t reply in any capacity to the original point I made, no matter how many times I repeat it, and which is explicitly stated in the Bible itself.
>Key word: Spiritual.
Oh, neat! So… ye shall know them by their fruits! Therefore get rid of all of them! We’re not in a suicide pact, no matter what your filthy subhuman jewish ass thinks.
>causes the average Christian (read: basically all of them)
Translation: “Trannies are real because they say they are.”
>Not in every case.
Thanks; you’ve conceded the argument and admitted your premise is a psychotic delusion not found in Christian doctrine.
>Would he pardon you for withholding your own gifts?
[Yeah.](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%207:6-12&version=KJV) Literally yeah. 100% yeah.
>Many of them are already here. Legally, in fact.
Cool; I don’t recognize jewish law, though.
>it flies in the face of your spiritual philosophy to do so. That's my point.
Your point is a falsehood only jews have ever said.