faggots
(twitter.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
I'd ask you the same thing. Let me ask you this: Why haven't the jews completely replaced Christianity with their religion? Why did they *choose* to subvert Christianity?
Why work from the inside out if it can just easily be toppled?
You see what I'm saying? To completely replace something that has been entrenched, with something completely new that has never been tried... it doesn't work. You're then fighting the ghosts of the religion you're trying to supplant, and then they WILL become part of the enemy.
How do you think the jews slowly turned Christianity into the charade it currently is? If it can move along in a jewish direction, it can be moved back in a Christian direction. You then put vanguards there so the jew cannot beguile.
It's better to just show Christians they've been tricked, point to real world examples and scenarios, and then ask them to square it. The old boomer guard might be retarded, as he retreats off into his retirement of carrots, but the younger generation has been given all stick for the past 40 years.
I think Christianity with NatSoc is a winning strategy. There's precedence for it, and we can now take it further than its creator ever intended.
They're a parasitical race, the way the operate is that they redirect the existing mechanisms to suit their goals. The same reason why they haven't fully replaced all the governments they've taken over in the west, but instead have just corrupted them for their own benefit.
> You see what I'm saying? To completely replace something that has been entrenched, with something completely new that has never been tried... it doesn't work.
Yeah it's hard, but I never said you need to convert. Simply accept the fact that the religion isn't the framework you need to use, and come up with a new one. Whether it's a political movement or something else, you just can't expect to turn millions of cucked Christians to see the light.
> It's better to just show Christians they've been tricked, point to real world examples and scenarios, and then ask them to square it. The old boomer guard might be retarded, as he retreats off into his retirement of carrots, but the younger generation has been given all stick for the past 40 years.
I mean just seeing the arguments between you guys and Breadpilled show me that the book is too ambiguous and can be interpreted in too many different ways for that to be possible. It's easier said than done.
> I think Christianity with NatSoc is a winning strategy. There's precedence for it, and we can now take it further than its creator ever intended.
As long as this time we finish the fucking job, and don't just give them another free trip to elsewhere. Then sure. But if some assholes are going to show up saying "thou shall not kill" or some cucked shit, then I'm all out.
I think it's easier to do this, than to create something completely new and have everyone follow it. That's my point.
> I mean just seeing the arguments between you guys and Breadpilled show me that the book is too ambiguous and can be interpreted in too many different ways for that to be possible. It's easier said than done.
This is why I'm saying that it requires a *heightened* understanding. This includes understanding the jewish tricks that have been planted inside the religion.
If White Christians just kept race in mind (as in pro White) when interpreting passages, I don't think there'd be too many disagreements. We now have the receipts to show what will happen when we don't keep race in mind.