10 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
I'm over the target. Getting negative downvotes on salient points.
u/Breadpilled and u/ScallionPancake are almost certainly subversive agents, as anyone who references Christianity as a negative, instead of a positive that needs a few adjustments to return to roots, is immediately suspect.
Hitler himself was Christian. So these two loons can screech about how 2+2=5 all they want. Makes little difference to me. I just hope that by quoting the mans actual words, others will be inspired.
*"MY FEELINGS AS A CHRISTIAN points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a CHRISTIAN and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders... Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross."* - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 11
Also when you call somebody a subversive agent, without being able to answer their questions… it’s just an admission of defeat.
> Hitler himself was Christian. So these two loons can screech about how 2+2=5 all they want. Makes little difference to me. I just hope that by quoting the mans actual words, others will be inspired.
I love Hitler just as much as the other guy. I consider him one of the greatest men to ever live.
Yet he still did not holocaust the jews, as he should’ve. And dozens of other Christian countries lined up to fight their own race for the jew’s benefit. So your argument falls flat.
10 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Do you think that Christians are infallible and cannot be tricked? Likewise, do you think non believers are invincible in their non belief, or any other belief?
Why come down so hard on the system that has pulled the most weight for our camp?
Even from a completely neutral standpoint, you have to admit the guard should be brought up, especially now, especially seeing how you believe Christianity has been so thoroughly subverted...
If you think 95% of Christians can be turned to be pro west and pro white, then explain how it’s done.
> Why come down so hard on the system that has pulled the most weight for our camp?
I don’t have any strong feelings towards it one way or another. I’m simply stating my observations. I don’t think it’s working, and I don’t think it’s possible to fix it.
My only goal is the preservation of the white race, the west, and the destruction of the jews. I don’t see Christianity as being the right tool for the job.
> Even from a completely neutral standpoint, you have to admit the guard should be brought up, especially now, especially seeing how you believe Christianity has been so thoroughly subverted...
It’s been subverted, you think it works and can be saved. I don’t think it can be. Your beliefs are based on emotion and desire. While mine are just looking at the current state of affairs. We’re never going to agree. But you should hear the valid criticisms if you ever want to do something about it.
When 95% of the religion’s followers are cucked, and for 2000 years they didn’t simply genocide a bunch of dysgenic kikes. You can’t really say I’m wrong. Instead of arguing against the facts, just realize what I’m saying is true and either fix your religion or go find a new mindset that will reach the goals we all want.
10 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
> If you think 95% of Christians can be turned to be pro west and pro white, then explain how it’s done.
I'd ask you the same thing. Let me ask you this: Why haven't the jews completely replaced Christianity with their religion? Why did they *choose* to subvert Christianity?
Why work from the inside out if it can just easily be toppled?
You see what I'm saying? To completely replace something that has been entrenched, with something completely new that has never been tried... it doesn't work. You're then fighting the ghosts of the religion you're trying to supplant, and then they WILL become part of the enemy.
How do you think the jews slowly turned Christianity into the charade it currently is? If it can move along in a jewish direction, it can be moved back in a Christian direction. You then put vanguards there so the jew cannot beguile.
It's better to just show Christians they've been tricked, point to real world examples and scenarios, and then ask them to square it. The old boomer guard might be retarded, as he retreats off into his retirement of carrots, but the younger generation has been given all stick for the past 40 years.
I think Christianity with NatSoc is a winning strategy. There's precedence for it, and we can now take it further than its creator ever intended.
10 days ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
Per Scallion...
> Also when you call somebody a subversive agent, without being able to answer their questions… it’s just an admission of defeat.
Ding-ding-ding!
You'll notice how I never resort to lashing out and calling people jews or subverters *simply because* they argue for Christianity. I point out how *Christianity itself* organically enables those camps with its doctrines, and let my arguments stand on their own.
Virtually every time, without fail, the Christians I debate with dodge my points, fume, and call me a jew with zero evidence. That isn't strength. That is a blind rage response from someone whose ego is deeply threatened by the words I'm saying. So their cognition instinctively regresses into "Destroy. Remove" rather than metabolize that my position is coherent.
> Hitler himself was Christian...
Putting aside the not insignificant cache of information that suggests he may have merely been *using* Christianity for secular ends, is your god Hitler, or is your god Christ? I base my arguments in the words of the latter.
Except I've been answering your replies in good faith. I have not dodged your points and have answered succinctly.
Bottom line is jews hate Christ and this is what causes me to shoot from the hip in this regard.
I personally believe we're in the hell we're in because the vanguards and guardians, that should have guarded Christendom against this modern onslaught, were too easily disposed of, written off, quiet, bribed and or modest. Am I wrong?
This is the position I take up, one of heightened scrutiny and exacting attention. I'll tell you my position honestly: Anyone who demeans Christianity without ascribing its merits is immediately pushed back against. Period.
Anyone trying to downplay the system that has had the most success against the jew, gets immediate pushback from me. I really have no concern if atheists, pagans or whatever else get caught in the crossfire. jews hate Christ and will continue to attack him and his followers.
I want a strong, militant God Emperor Christendom to rise. It will need stalwart vanguards to push back against any scrutiny, honest or otherwise. I'm trying to be a very small, tiny, insignificant part of the world I'd like to see.
u/Breadpilled and u/ScallionPancake are almost certainly subversive agents, as anyone who references Christianity as a negative, instead of a positive that needs a few adjustments to return to roots, is immediately suspect.
Hitler himself was Christian. So these two loons can screech about how 2+2=5 all they want. Makes little difference to me. I just hope that by quoting the mans actual words, others will be inspired.
*"MY FEELINGS AS A CHRISTIAN points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a CHRISTIAN and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders... Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross."* - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 11
Also when you call somebody a subversive agent, without being able to answer their questions… it’s just an admission of defeat.
> Hitler himself was Christian. So these two loons can screech about how 2+2=5 all they want. Makes little difference to me. I just hope that by quoting the mans actual words, others will be inspired.
I love Hitler just as much as the other guy. I consider him one of the greatest men to ever live.
Yet he still did not holocaust the jews, as he should’ve. And dozens of other Christian countries lined up to fight their own race for the jew’s benefit. So your argument falls flat.
Why come down so hard on the system that has pulled the most weight for our camp?
Even from a completely neutral standpoint, you have to admit the guard should be brought up, especially now, especially seeing how you believe Christianity has been so thoroughly subverted...
> Why come down so hard on the system that has pulled the most weight for our camp?
I don’t have any strong feelings towards it one way or another. I’m simply stating my observations. I don’t think it’s working, and I don’t think it’s possible to fix it.
My only goal is the preservation of the white race, the west, and the destruction of the jews. I don’t see Christianity as being the right tool for the job.
> Even from a completely neutral standpoint, you have to admit the guard should be brought up, especially now, especially seeing how you believe Christianity has been so thoroughly subverted...
It’s been subverted, you think it works and can be saved. I don’t think it can be. Your beliefs are based on emotion and desire. While mine are just looking at the current state of affairs. We’re never going to agree. But you should hear the valid criticisms if you ever want to do something about it.
When 95% of the religion’s followers are cucked, and for 2000 years they didn’t simply genocide a bunch of dysgenic kikes. You can’t really say I’m wrong. Instead of arguing against the facts, just realize what I’m saying is true and either fix your religion or go find a new mindset that will reach the goals we all want.
I'd ask you the same thing. Let me ask you this: Why haven't the jews completely replaced Christianity with their religion? Why did they *choose* to subvert Christianity?
Why work from the inside out if it can just easily be toppled?
You see what I'm saying? To completely replace something that has been entrenched, with something completely new that has never been tried... it doesn't work. You're then fighting the ghosts of the religion you're trying to supplant, and then they WILL become part of the enemy.
How do you think the jews slowly turned Christianity into the charade it currently is? If it can move along in a jewish direction, it can be moved back in a Christian direction. You then put vanguards there so the jew cannot beguile.
It's better to just show Christians they've been tricked, point to real world examples and scenarios, and then ask them to square it. The old boomer guard might be retarded, as he retreats off into his retirement of carrots, but the younger generation has been given all stick for the past 40 years.
I think Christianity with NatSoc is a winning strategy. There's precedence for it, and we can now take it further than its creator ever intended.
> Also when you call somebody a subversive agent, without being able to answer their questions… it’s just an admission of defeat.
Ding-ding-ding!
You'll notice how I never resort to lashing out and calling people jews or subverters *simply because* they argue for Christianity. I point out how *Christianity itself* organically enables those camps with its doctrines, and let my arguments stand on their own.
Virtually every time, without fail, the Christians I debate with dodge my points, fume, and call me a jew with zero evidence. That isn't strength. That is a blind rage response from someone whose ego is deeply threatened by the words I'm saying. So their cognition instinctively regresses into "Destroy. Remove" rather than metabolize that my position is coherent.
> Hitler himself was Christian...
Putting aside the not insignificant cache of information that suggests he may have merely been *using* Christianity for secular ends, is your god Hitler, or is your god Christ? I base my arguments in the words of the latter.
Bottom line is jews hate Christ and this is what causes me to shoot from the hip in this regard.
I personally believe we're in the hell we're in because the vanguards and guardians, that should have guarded Christendom against this modern onslaught, were too easily disposed of, written off, quiet, bribed and or modest. Am I wrong?
This is the position I take up, one of heightened scrutiny and exacting attention. I'll tell you my position honestly: Anyone who demeans Christianity without ascribing its merits is immediately pushed back against. Period.
Anyone trying to downplay the system that has had the most success against the jew, gets immediate pushback from me. I really have no concern if atheists, pagans or whatever else get caught in the crossfire. jews hate Christ and will continue to attack him and his followers.
I want a strong, militant God Emperor Christendom to rise. It will need stalwart vanguards to push back against any scrutiny, honest or otherwise. I'm trying to be a very small, tiny, insignificant part of the world I'd like to see.