New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
40
faggots (twitter.com)
posted 11 days ago by nogangonbang on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +40Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Can-Maga on scored.co
11 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
See, you assume they're different races here, but this example is about class distinctions. You'd know that if you looked at the greater context of Scripture and contemporary history.

To use another example to see what you're doing wrong, read all of Acts 10, summarize it, then try telling me Peter's vision made pork clean. It's impossible once you consider the greater context. It's using Peter's hunger as an allegory for people, where God made all dispersed Israelites clean.

I would highly recommend this podcast https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/biblical-exegesis-revisited
ScallionPancake on scored.co
10 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The fact that it’s so hard for either of you to come to a conclusion is proof in itself that the book is too ambiguous, which leads to lack of clarity, which leads to a weak belief system, which leads to subversion.

You need a better framework to preserve the west and kin.
Can-Maga on scored.co
10 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
It's really not. Feel free to listen to that exegesis podcast, only if you're fully white though.

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/biblical-exegesis-revisited
Toast message