faggots
(twitter.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
The irony here is more painful than it is funny, considering that you're seriously trying to tell me that Christ defined "neighbor" as being exclusive to racial kin.
**He literally says the opposite. Very explicitly:**
> 25 On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
> 26 “What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”
> 27 He answered, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’[c]; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[d]”
> 28 “You have answered correctly,” Jesus replied. “Do this and you will live.”
> 29 But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”
> 30 In reply Jesus said: “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. 31 A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. 32 So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. 33 But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. 34 He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to an inn and took care of him. 35 The next day he took out two denarii[e] and gave them to the innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’
> 36 “Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”
> 37 The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.”
> Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”
Do you notice how I never need to link to external walls of text written by copium junkies in order to make my arguments? I literally just quote the Bible. I understand your religion better than you, which is why I do not practice it.
What society would YOU rather live in: Fake christianity? The jew? Or the merciful brotherhood of Christ?
> I understand your religion better than you, which is why I do not practice it.
Hmmmmmm
u/Breadpilled and u/ScallionPancake are almost certainly subversive agents, as anyone who references Christianity as a negative, instead of a positive that needs a few adjustments to return to roots, is immediately suspect.
Hitler himself was Christian. So these two loons can screech about how 2+2=5 all they want. Makes little difference to me. I just hope that by quoting the mans actual words, others will be inspired.
*"MY FEELINGS AS A CHRISTIAN points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a CHRISTIAN and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders... Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross."* - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 11
Also when you call somebody a subversive agent, without being able to answer their questions… it’s just an admission of defeat.
> Hitler himself was Christian. So these two loons can screech about how 2+2=5 all they want. Makes little difference to me. I just hope that by quoting the mans actual words, others will be inspired.
I love Hitler just as much as the other guy. I consider him one of the greatest men to ever live.
Yet he still did not holocaust the jews, as he should’ve. And dozens of other Christian countries lined up to fight their own race for the jew’s benefit. So your argument falls flat.
Why come down so hard on the system that has pulled the most weight for our camp?
Even from a completely neutral standpoint, you have to admit the guard should be brought up, especially now, especially seeing how you believe Christianity has been so thoroughly subverted...
> Also when you call somebody a subversive agent, without being able to answer their questions… it’s just an admission of defeat.
Ding-ding-ding!
You'll notice how I never resort to lashing out and calling people jews or subverters *simply because* they argue for Christianity. I point out how *Christianity itself* organically enables those camps with its doctrines, and let my arguments stand on their own.
Virtually every time, without fail, the Christians I debate with dodge my points, fume, and call me a jew with zero evidence. That isn't strength. That is a blind rage response from someone whose ego is deeply threatened by the words I'm saying. So their cognition instinctively regresses into "Destroy. Remove" rather than metabolize that my position is coherent.
> Hitler himself was Christian...
Putting aside the not insignificant cache of information that suggests he may have merely been *using* Christianity for secular ends, is your god Hitler, or is your god Christ? I base my arguments in the words of the latter.
Bottom line is jews hate Christ and this is what causes me to shoot from the hip in this regard.
I personally believe we're in the hell we're in because the vanguards and guardians, that should have guarded Christendom against this modern onslaught, were too easily disposed of, written off, quiet, bribed and or modest. Am I wrong?
This is the position I take up, one of heightened scrutiny and exacting attention. I'll tell you my position honestly: Anyone who demeans Christianity without ascribing its merits is immediately pushed back against. Period.
Anyone trying to downplay the system that has had the most success against the jew, gets immediate pushback from me. I really have no concern if atheists, pagans or whatever else get caught in the crossfire. jews hate Christ and will continue to attack him and his followers.
I want a strong, militant God Emperor Christendom to rise. It will need stalwart vanguards to push back against any scrutiny, honest or otherwise. I'm trying to be a very small, tiny, insignificant part of the world I'd like to see.
The entire moral lynchpin of the parable of the good Samaritan is that "neighbor" transcends racial boundaries. "Neighbor" is the person in front of you, with particular reference to *physical proximity.* The man (going from *Jerusalem to Jericho)* is strongly implied to be jewish. The entire reason that the Samaritan's charity is so charged is because he is extending it to a racial outsider, and one he has natural cause to be hostile towards at that.
Jesus himself would *rebuke* you for thinking you can shrink the definition of neighbor to just your racial kin. You are morally bound by your own faith to give of yourself to *anyone* in need, regardless of how they ended up in your path.
Seriously, you people can parse that the messaging in Hollywood media products is pozzed, but not this shit?
> What society would YOU rather live in: Fake christianity? The jew? Or the merciful brotherhood of Christ?
We're currently living all of the above simultaneously. All the Catholic beaners and Christian Haitians entering your country are your brothers in Christ by definition, per Galatians 3:28.
It says the opposite of your argument.
>Jesus himself would rebuke you for thinking you can shrink the definition of neighbor to just your racial kin.
Nope. “Embrace your neighbor as your brother.” Does your brother live in your house? Eat your food? Command your family?
Fuck off, retard.
>All the Catholic beaners and Christian Haitians entering your country are your brothers in Christ by definition, per Galatians 3:28.
Ye shall know them by their fruits. What are their fruits, exactly?
It doesn't.
> Nope. “Embrace your neighbor as your brother.” Does your brother live in your house? Eat your food? Command your family?
How about you address the text I actually quoted instead of referencing a verse that doesn't even exist?
> Ye shall know them by their fruits. What are their fruits, exactly?
It only takes a single one of them who passes the rubric of Christian charity (and they do exist, particularly among beaners) to render this point inert.
It does.
>How about you address the text I actually quoted
I did.
>instead of referencing a verse that doesn't even exist?
[Shoot yourself, jew.](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%2012&version=KJV)
>Having then **gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us**, whether prophecy, let us prophesy according to the proportion of faith… **Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love**; in honour preferring one another;
The crux of this is that you’re pretending (like every jew does) that we have to treat nonbelievers the same as believers.
>It only takes a single one of them who passes the rubric of Christian charity (and they do exist, particularly among beaners) to render this point inert.
lol, *“he raped fifty children but then he gave to charity so it’s okay!”* No one will ever believe that bullshit.
> The man (going from Jerusalem to Jericho) is strongly implied to be jewish.
lol OK
The levite is the jew, the priest is the failed christian and the samaritan is your kin. Jesus himself recognized the distinction between actual and fake Christianity, which is why it was a priest, not a commoner, who kept walking.
There's as much evidence to suggest the samaritan is of kin, if not more so, than he is not.
> Jesus himself would rebuke you for thinking you can shrink the definition of neighbor to just your racial kin. You are morally bound by your own faith to give of yourself to anyone in need, regardless of how they ended up in your path.
Yeah, except I don't consider sub IQ feral animals to be men, let alone my kin.
> We're currently living all of the above simultaneously.
Yes. The hell that jews created.
> All the Catholic beaners and Christian Haitians entering your country are your brothers in Christ by definition, per Galatians 3:28.
^^ This guy believes niggers are men lol
Foreign invaders forced through the gates by the jew aren't my brothers or my kin. But again, nice of you to conflate modern jewish NGOs with the good moral teachings of Christendom. It's practically a 1:1!
Not the roast you think it is. I *wasn't* interpreting the text initially, but did so in the next message when you displayed a failure to pick up on the subtext.
Kind of like you did here.
> “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”
> “For he himself is our peace, who has made the two groups one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility… his purpose was to create in himself one new humanity out of the two.”
> “For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, bestowing his riches on all who call on him. For everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”
> “After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb.”
> “Then Peter began to speak: ‘I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation the one who fears him and does what is right.’”
If you want to argue that non-whites can be Christian, but shouldn't be in your country, that's impotent, but logical. But trying to claim that Christianity doesn't consider the other races human at all is a nonstarter. That is delusional.
That's what I said initially. Didn't stop you from disagreeing.
> Kind of like you did here.
Yeah, except I never quoted any of that lol
> That is delusional.
I don't think so. These arguments are what's going to be required moving forward if there is any hope of building a moral, high trust society like NatSoc Germany did.
Regardless, the fact of the matter is you *ARE* interpreting the text, just as many others have and will continue to do. What's curious about your interpretations is that they're only done *against* Christendom.
You seem very smug about criticizing a belief system that has kept the yid on the back foot for almost 2000 years. Throwing its entire legacy away because of modern small hat subversion is magnitudes more delusional than anything I've said.
To use another example to see what you're doing wrong, read all of Acts 10, summarize it, then try telling me Peter's vision made pork clean. It's impossible once you consider the greater context. It's using Peter's hunger as an allegory for people, where God made all dispersed Israelites clean.
I would highly recommend this podcast https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/biblical-exegesis-revisited
You need a better framework to preserve the west and kin.
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/biblical-exegesis-revisited