faggots
(twitter.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
The purpose of a system isn't what it does, it's what I say it *should* do!
Here is something I've shared recently regarding treating your neighbor as yourself, which I'll just paste: Fun fact, Christ was quoting the Old Testament, which defines neighbor as your own people, through a Hebrew parallelism (two phrases that mean the same thing). Show that to a church-goer xD.
"18 You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself" (Leviticus 19)
If you're bored and fully white (to the best of your knowledge), I'd recommend giving this a listen, or search any topic and find one: https://christogenea.org/podcasts/community/christian-outreach/william-finck-jermwarfare-ukcolumn-biblical-history-jews
Also, page 6 covers this topic in more depth: https://media.christogenea.org/system/files/resources/Against_Heresies_Handbook_CI_No_Highlights.pdf
The irony here is more painful than it is funny, considering that you're seriously trying to tell me that Christ defined "neighbor" as being exclusive to racial kin.
**He literally says the opposite. Very explicitly:**
> 25 On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
> 26 “What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”
> 27 He answered, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’[c]; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[d]”
> 28 “You have answered correctly,” Jesus replied. “Do this and you will live.”
> 29 But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”
> 30 In reply Jesus said: “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. 31 A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. 32 So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. 33 But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. 34 He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to an inn and took care of him. 35 The next day he took out two denarii[e] and gave them to the innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’
> 36 “Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”
> 37 The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.”
> Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”
Do you notice how I never need to link to external walls of text written by copium junkies in order to make my arguments? I literally just quote the Bible. I understand your religion better than you, which is why I do not practice it.
What society would YOU rather live in: Fake christianity? The jew? Or the merciful brotherhood of Christ?
> I understand your religion better than you, which is why I do not practice it.
Hmmmmmm
u/Breadpilled and u/ScallionPancake are almost certainly subversive agents, as anyone who references Christianity as a negative, instead of a positive that needs a few adjustments to return to roots, is immediately suspect.
Hitler himself was Christian. So these two loons can screech about how 2+2=5 all they want. Makes little difference to me. I just hope that by quoting the mans actual words, others will be inspired.
*"MY FEELINGS AS A CHRISTIAN points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a CHRISTIAN and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders... Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross."* - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 11
The entire moral lynchpin of the parable of the good Samaritan is that "neighbor" transcends racial boundaries. "Neighbor" is the person in front of you, with particular reference to *physical proximity.* The man (going from *Jerusalem to Jericho)* is strongly implied to be jewish. The entire reason that the Samaritan's charity is so charged is because he is extending it to a racial outsider, and one he has natural cause to be hostile towards at that.
Jesus himself would *rebuke* you for thinking you can shrink the definition of neighbor to just your racial kin. You are morally bound by your own faith to give of yourself to *anyone* in need, regardless of how they ended up in your path.
Seriously, you people can parse that the messaging in Hollywood media products is pozzed, but not this shit?
> What society would YOU rather live in: Fake christianity? The jew? Or the merciful brotherhood of Christ?
We're currently living all of the above simultaneously. All the Catholic beaners and Christian Haitians entering your country are your brothers in Christ by definition, per Galatians 3:28.
It says the opposite of your argument.
>Jesus himself would rebuke you for thinking you can shrink the definition of neighbor to just your racial kin.
Nope. “Embrace your neighbor as your brother.” Does your brother live in your house? Eat your food? Command your family?
Fuck off, retard.
>All the Catholic beaners and Christian Haitians entering your country are your brothers in Christ by definition, per Galatians 3:28.
Ye shall know them by their fruits. What are their fruits, exactly?
> The man (going from Jerusalem to Jericho) is strongly implied to be jewish.
lol OK
The levite is the jew, the priest is the failed christian and the samaritan is your kin. Jesus himself recognized the distinction between actual and fake Christianity, which is why it was a priest, not a commoner, who kept walking.
There's as much evidence to suggest the samaritan is of kin, if not more so, than he is not.
> Jesus himself would rebuke you for thinking you can shrink the definition of neighbor to just your racial kin. You are morally bound by your own faith to give of yourself to anyone in need, regardless of how they ended up in your path.
Yeah, except I don't consider sub IQ feral animals to be men, let alone my kin.
> We're currently living all of the above simultaneously.
Yes. The hell that jews created.
> All the Catholic beaners and Christian Haitians entering your country are your brothers in Christ by definition, per Galatians 3:28.
^^ This guy believes niggers are men lol
Foreign invaders forced through the gates by the jew aren't my brothers or my kin. But again, nice of you to conflate modern jewish NGOs with the good moral teachings of Christendom. It's practically a 1:1!
To use another example to see what you're doing wrong, read all of Acts 10, summarize it, then try telling me Peter's vision made pork clean. It's impossible once you consider the greater context. It's using Peter's hunger as an allegory for people, where God made all dispersed Israelites clean.
I would highly recommend this podcast https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/biblical-exegesis-revisited
You need a better framework to preserve the west and kin.
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/biblical-exegesis-revisited
See, all you have to do is to listen to communists what they are saying and doing *right now*. So what the fuck do I care that it wasn't ***real*** communism if they want to genocide, niggerize, mongrelize and faggotize us anyway? It means whatever was "fake" communism was STILL better than whatever they propose today. We already *know* what horror shitshow dystopia they want to manifest and work towards. The economic side doesn't even matter at that point - if they'd argue an ethnic homogeneous communist system, I'd say fine, let's talk. But if their first step is my extinction, there is nothing to even consider.
You can't talk your way out of a brown bear that wants to kill and eat you. You fight, flee, intimidate it - or you die.
> You can't apply it to Christianity
But you can. The problem is however that if Christianity is practiced and perpetuated in a bad way for ages, and most people believe it works as it should, at some point you have to acknowledge that that is how it is. You can call it "fake", and argue that there is a real version of it, but
There is a version like Positives Christentum, but you have to acknowledge that it would be a different denomination, something that would change as it is. And also that many people would resist it simply because they grow up as they did and do not want to change.
Literally can do the same thing about Christianity. What are they doing today? Being a bunch of cucks. Case in point, nuff said.
The Israelites, our white ancestors, failed to keep their covenant with God. If they couldn't follow the law, how can we?
Anyways, I don't consider myself very good at explaining things. I'll leave you with a podcast on biblical exegesis, which is a method to interpret Scripture, and a huge series on the protocols and how they've been effected in the world.
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/biblical-exegesis-revisited
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/historical/protocols
That just goes to validate what we’re all seeing.
You guys need to stop coping and just accept the facts. I’m sorry, but the truth is rarely pleasant.
>objective definitions don’t exist
Yep, kill yourself, jew.
But point out how it applies to Christianity in *spades?* **Triggered.**
Drink bleach, yid. We’ll never worship your trannies.
You lost and you’re going to continue losing, nothing will change because you refuse to change. Every day you prove me right.
>IGNORE THAT YOU LITERALLY JUST SAID THE OPPOSITE OF [X] IN THE COMMENT TO WHICH I AM REPLYING
Is this the best you can do, paid jewish shill?