7 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
The jews wouldn't have been able to carry out the russian revolutions (any of them. The 1905 one, the February one, or the October one) if the tsar wasn't *actually* the absolute disaster of a leader that he was. The Russo-Japanese war was a catastrophic failure that was the impetus behind the urban russian popular support for the 1905 revolution. Then, instead of actually doing anything about this failure to rectify the issue, the tsar chose to double down and entered ww1. A war against the most powerful and mechanized military in the world with one that didn't even have enough boots for its conscripts. For the sake of a random country that most russians didn't even know existed. This made almost everyone in the country hate him. Even the white army was very much divided on their support for the prior monarchy. After all, the preceding russian army did absolutely nothing to stop the tsar from being deposed in the first place because they didn't like him either.
*Something* bad was going to happen to the monarchy. With or without jews. Without jews, it likely would have been the rebirth of the narodniks and, effectively, the same as the bolshevik revolution without the jewish aim of murdering everyone and destroying the church. To prevent the russian empire from collapsing we would basically have to rewrite the entirety of russian history and everything the monarchy did from 1904 to 1917. And not just the monarchy, but the provisional government as well. Kerensky ended up being just as much of a fucking retard if not more so, and continued the war effort (the reason he even came to power in the first place), which caused the protests against him to become extremely violent and angry in comparison to the ones against the tsar. Leading to the bolshevik seizure of power.
The bolsheviks didn't take power just because of jewish propaganda. It was because of the utter incompetence of everyone else and the outwardly cohesive and organized nature that the bolsheviks represented (of course, internally, the party was ready to split in thirds between stalin, trotsky, and bukharin upon the death of lenin, but this wouldn't be an issue for a little while to come). The white army on the other hand was a disorganized shitshow full of constant infighting and wildly dissimilar views between each leader, each local commander, and each soldier. Plus it was supported by people the russians did not like (particularly the Japanese and the British). The foreign aid received by the whites backfired and was even more ammunition for the bolshevik propaganda apparatus to say that they were a foreign backed entity.
It's safe to say that the white army was pretty much fucked and had little to no chance of actually achieving victory. And if they did achieve victory, they were so divisive on everything that russia probably would have had a sequel to the civil war. Things happened the way they did. As I said, to prevent the bolshevik revolution, you need to rewrite almost everything that happened in Russia from the late 1800s to the 1910s.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Adding onto this (I didn't want to make the original post a mile long):
The russians were tired of playing second fiddle to western Europe. They lost out on colonization and empire building and compensated with taking a shit ton of pretty much useless land in the far east as opposed to the money pits all of the other powers got.
They lost out on the Renaissance and the transition to mercantilism. The Renaissance had an impact almost everywhere but Russia.
They lost out on the industrial revolution and capitalism.
Almost every tsar tried desperately to play catch up with the west and failed miserably in their attempt to do so. Peter the great was the closest, but he turned into a draconian bag of dicks and fucked over the orthodox church. Catherine the great almost made Russia a near peer adversary with the west, but lost her fucking mind after the French revolution.
Russia kept feudalism for 400 years after the west abolished it, and still failed to actually industrialize after getting rid of serfdom. The only "power" that was worse off than russia at the turn of the 20th century was Qing china, and maybe the ottomans.
Add onto that the doubling down on every aspect of russian life that Alexander III implemented, and the disastrous wars that tsar Nicholas got himself involved in, and Russia was absolutely primed for a revolt.
So the russians wanted to take power into their own hands, and they saw bolshevism as not only a way to be peer to peer with the west, but a way to lead the pack. And, in all honesty, they actually were leading the pack for a while after ww2. They were the strongest military power in the world and the US was on the defensive against communist expansion during the cold war. They managed to have a litany of countries follow in their footsteps instead of dismissing Russia as a bunch of backwards retards. One of those countries that followed in the USSR's footsteps has exceeded the soviet union and will probably exceed the United states soon.
For all of its faults and considering that it was originally established as a jewish hell-state, the soviet union actually made the world recognize Russia as something other than Europe's backwater. Which is what many patriotic russians really wanted in the first place. Instead of playing second fiddle to the west and trying desperately to catch up, they did something entirely different and ended up more powerful than any of the former western powers.
So there were many factors influencing the russian revolution and civil war. Jewish stoking of the fire, legitimate grievances, the ineffectiveness of the kerensky government, and russian revanchism were the main ones.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Yeah, and the white army had violent and barbaric turkic Cossacks from central asia and native siberians under their belt, and were still unable to use these people efficiently. And it was mostly chinese that the bolsheviks had in their ranks because the KMT was still friendly to the ussr, rather than koreans who were subject to the Japanese. Mongolians though, yes. But the white army was lost from the beginning, hate to admit it but its true. They were not winning the civil war. The white army was incapable of creating a stable state or army because of internal disputes. The bolsheviks were able to unite in a goal and common enemy whereas half the time the white army hated themselves more than the communists
There was also the fact that the reds enjoyed a larger share of eastern front veterans (veterans of failed wars are always the first to be attracted to political violence) vs the white army that recruited mainly out of untrained peasantry. Especially later on in the war after mutinies, defections, and surrenders, which the white army always had a bigger problem with (once again, sometimes the soldiers might hate their commanders more than they did the reds. Or vice versa)
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
*Something* bad was going to happen to the monarchy. With or without jews. Without jews, it likely would have been the rebirth of the narodniks and, effectively, the same as the bolshevik revolution without the jewish aim of murdering everyone and destroying the church. To prevent the russian empire from collapsing we would basically have to rewrite the entirety of russian history and everything the monarchy did from 1904 to 1917. And not just the monarchy, but the provisional government as well. Kerensky ended up being just as much of a fucking retard if not more so, and continued the war effort (the reason he even came to power in the first place), which caused the protests against him to become extremely violent and angry in comparison to the ones against the tsar. Leading to the bolshevik seizure of power.
The bolsheviks didn't take power just because of jewish propaganda. It was because of the utter incompetence of everyone else and the outwardly cohesive and organized nature that the bolsheviks represented (of course, internally, the party was ready to split in thirds between stalin, trotsky, and bukharin upon the death of lenin, but this wouldn't be an issue for a little while to come). The white army on the other hand was a disorganized shitshow full of constant infighting and wildly dissimilar views between each leader, each local commander, and each soldier. Plus it was supported by people the russians did not like (particularly the Japanese and the British). The foreign aid received by the whites backfired and was even more ammunition for the bolshevik propaganda apparatus to say that they were a foreign backed entity.
It's safe to say that the white army was pretty much fucked and had little to no chance of actually achieving victory. And if they did achieve victory, they were so divisive on everything that russia probably would have had a sequel to the civil war. Things happened the way they did. As I said, to prevent the bolshevik revolution, you need to rewrite almost everything that happened in Russia from the late 1800s to the 1910s.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
The russians were tired of playing second fiddle to western Europe. They lost out on colonization and empire building and compensated with taking a shit ton of pretty much useless land in the far east as opposed to the money pits all of the other powers got.
They lost out on the Renaissance and the transition to mercantilism. The Renaissance had an impact almost everywhere but Russia.
They lost out on the industrial revolution and capitalism.
Almost every tsar tried desperately to play catch up with the west and failed miserably in their attempt to do so. Peter the great was the closest, but he turned into a draconian bag of dicks and fucked over the orthodox church. Catherine the great almost made Russia a near peer adversary with the west, but lost her fucking mind after the French revolution.
Russia kept feudalism for 400 years after the west abolished it, and still failed to actually industrialize after getting rid of serfdom. The only "power" that was worse off than russia at the turn of the 20th century was Qing china, and maybe the ottomans.
Add onto that the doubling down on every aspect of russian life that Alexander III implemented, and the disastrous wars that tsar Nicholas got himself involved in, and Russia was absolutely primed for a revolt.
So the russians wanted to take power into their own hands, and they saw bolshevism as not only a way to be peer to peer with the west, but a way to lead the pack. And, in all honesty, they actually were leading the pack for a while after ww2. They were the strongest military power in the world and the US was on the defensive against communist expansion during the cold war. They managed to have a litany of countries follow in their footsteps instead of dismissing Russia as a bunch of backwards retards. One of those countries that followed in the USSR's footsteps has exceeded the soviet union and will probably exceed the United states soon.
For all of its faults and considering that it was originally established as a jewish hell-state, the soviet union actually made the world recognize Russia as something other than Europe's backwater. Which is what many patriotic russians really wanted in the first place. Instead of playing second fiddle to the west and trying desperately to catch up, they did something entirely different and ended up more powerful than any of the former western powers.
So there were many factors influencing the russian revolution and civil war. Jewish stoking of the fire, legitimate grievances, the ineffectiveness of the kerensky government, and russian revanchism were the main ones.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
This was not some case of philosophical difference. Jews paid foreign invaders to murder rape and torture.
There was also the fact that the reds enjoyed a larger share of eastern front veterans (veterans of failed wars are always the first to be attracted to political violence) vs the white army that recruited mainly out of untrained peasantry. Especially later on in the war after mutinies, defections, and surrenders, which the white army always had a bigger problem with (once again, sometimes the soldiers might hate their commanders more than they did the reds. Or vice versa)
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed