You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
devotech2 on scored.co
7 days ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Yeah, and the white army had violent and barbaric turkic Cossacks from central asia and native siberians under their belt, and were still unable to use these people efficiently. And it was mostly chinese that the bolsheviks had in their ranks because the KMT was still friendly to the ussr, rather than koreans who were subject to the Japanese. Mongolians though, yes. But the white army was lost from the beginning, hate to admit it but its true. They were not winning the civil war. The white army was incapable of creating a stable state or army because of internal disputes. The bolsheviks were able to unite in a goal and common enemy whereas half the time the white army hated themselves more than the communists
There was also the fact that the reds enjoyed a larger share of eastern front veterans (veterans of failed wars are always the first to be attracted to political violence) vs the white army that recruited mainly out of untrained peasantry. Especially later on in the war after mutinies, defections, and surrenders, which the white army always had a bigger problem with (once again, sometimes the soldiers might hate their commanders more than they did the reds. Or vice versa)
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
There was also the fact that the reds enjoyed a larger share of eastern front veterans (veterans of failed wars are always the first to be attracted to political violence) vs the white army that recruited mainly out of untrained peasantry. Especially later on in the war after mutinies, defections, and surrenders, which the white army always had a bigger problem with (once again, sometimes the soldiers might hate their commanders more than they did the reds. Or vice versa)
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed