Its true
(twitter.com)
It's true. People are living in echo chambers.
That being said its not about everyone waking up, its about finding your brethren and banding together.
That being said its not about everyone waking up, its about finding your brethren and banding together.
Even during the bleakest times, we fight.
At least have a little dignity. When you express something informative, that's highly appreciated. But these are just pathetic, worthless outbursts that are just friendly fire. It appears like emotional incontinence.
There is only one way forward anyway. It's fighting or accepting extinction.
How about you work towards convincing people to join our side? Bring truth to them? The truth about Hitler, the truth about niggers, the truth about jews. And if you don't, you just accepted extinction. Well, some of us didn't, so respect our choices to not be like you.
>but my feelings
>no I have absolutely no justification for them
>but truth hurt feelings so truth not real
“Emotional incontinence” is claiming literally anything is happening anywhere to any extent. **You can’t even point to a single instance of a single white person not being arrested by his white peers for committing a crime against jews.** That’s how much nothing is happening. There’s not even the *pretense* of a *limited* form of *local* resistance. Why the fuck can’t you defend your claims?
*“People are talking!”* Great; white genocide is happening faster than ever. Maybe stop talking. *“But that’s illegal!”* Okay, guess we’re already dead for all eternity. *“So you do something!”* I’m not the one who claims anything will ever happen from anyone. You are. Yet you refuse to do that anything. *“Jews are losing power!”* And yet no one acts anywhere, because everyone knows that’s an obvious lie and they can deploy 1,000,000 troops anywhere on Earth with only 72 hours’ notice if they were actually threatened. There is no breakdown in communications anywhere on Earth. There is no breakdown in control anywhere on Earth. There are no localities, regions, or countries which so much as oppose their economic system.
If anything I said was actually wrong, you’d prove it. Instead you scream about emotions as though you’re not the only one being emotional. Imagine thinking you’ll ever “win” against anything when you refuse to internalize what you’re even fighting against.
We know nothing is happening. But a lot more people are noticing online than 10 years ago. And it is necessary for as many people as possible to do that, otherwise, as you said, we'll be stopped by our "peers." Even characters like Nick Fuentes (known as antisemitic and racist) got more into public and even has a lot of clips posted on YT. He even had an interview with Tucker Carlson. He gains quite a lot of popularity as well, so that's something. Asmongold's channel is regularly riddled with comments that notice or point out niggers, and his audience is way more radical than he is.
So "racism" is already soon at a point of public acceptance. 10 years ago? Not even close. There is a development, a trend.
> Why the fuck can’t you defend your claims?
You didn't ask me to. Now I did.
> Maybe stop talking.
Why should I? I work towards TND & TKD. Even if it's not much, at least I write comments that *may* change the minds of people, as to increase the support and decrease the resistance of the idea of TND & TKD. It is what is required anyway.
If talking is worthless, what are you doing here attempting to stop us from even doing that little? Why do you want us to do nothing, even though you argue that "doing nothing" is bad?
How are you contributing better than "doing nothing" at this point? Maybe you should stop talking?
> You are.
Yes, I am. But it is of speculative nature due to the nature of it - it's a prediction. You say that we go extinct and all efforts are futile, my prediction is that there will be NatSoc uprisings in the West, and that I will have contributed to it. That we can use something unprecedented (the internet) to reach as many people as possible.
I know already that you disagree. And there is nothing difficult to say that speculation -> bad. The problem is your attitude. What is even your goal? Do we have the same goal, or are you working against us?
You do not seem to be too busy "doing something" either, right?
> If anything I said was actually wrong, you’d prove it.
I didn't say you are wrong. In fact I am one of the people who say that you are right to others. But just as you can dismiss my predictions, so can I dismiss yours. I see a trend, you focus on past data. With the same logic you can say that a bomb is harmless and nothing ever happens, and until it explodes you are 100% right. How would you feel if it explodes? Stupid?
How would I feel if it wouldn't explode? Well, until my death I would hope it will, and I contribute in a way hoping that it will.
> Instead you scream about emotions as though you’re not the only one being emotional.
You are throwing a tantrum here, and I feel bothered by your repeated defeatism. Without emotions we'd have no will to live or to communicate, right? Let's not pretend either of us is the personification of objectivity here.
> Imagine thinking you’ll ever “win” against anything when you refuse to internalize what you’re even fighting against.
It is not me who has to do that. I have already decided on TND & TKD. I already know enough. I try to convert others towards these goals. For normal people it means making them notice jews and niggers. For right-wing people it means understanding WWII Germany. For people like us, it means dismissing the idea that deportations would suffice. For leftists it means making them look ridiculous or countering their nonsense with facts. There is something for everybody.
Do you have any idea how much text I write that ends up unread? 80-90% of what I write goes into nothingness. Do you have any idea how frustrating it is? With the amount of text I am writing on average, I could write books. And still, I do it anyways. Why? Maybe because I am irrational.
Just as it would be irrational to defend yourself when you or others are mildly harassed by gypsies in a bus. Why bother? The smartest thing is to do nothing. Maybe they deserve it anyway, maybe it's not worth the hassle. But MAYBE the smartest move is to beat the shit out of these gypsies and to take the risk and sacrifice, and to prove to others and yourself that you aren't harmless.
This is why your defeatism is so... annoying to me. Because being like you is something I would hate about myself. It is the EASY option. I would feel shame. I understand your points, and I respect you for expressing them, but still - that mentality is not viable to have. And your one-liner above is just sad. Or do you think that was a good comment? It looks like you have to touch grass to detox from the computer.
*Ｔｈｅｎ ｗｈｙ ｌｉｅ．*
>But a lot more people are noticing online than 10 years ago. And it is necessary for as many people as possible to do that, otherwise, as you said, we'll be stopped by our "peers.”
Sure. So where’s the inflection point?
>…Nick Fuentes… even had an interview with Tucker Carlson.
I want to comment on this as an aside to the broader conversation, and I’d like your views on this matter separately, if you don’t mind.
While I still believe in the validity of the *concept* of Great Man Theory, its implementation in practice hasn’t existed since 1945. As such, we have no leaders and cannot have leaders. What we have are controlled opposition puppets and/or people who get killed before they’re so much as known on a national level, never mind followed.
As such, I don’t trust any ’spokesmen’ for white interests, and haven’t my entire life. Because all of them have been either exposed for what they really are or were actually just degenerates, or weren’t and were simply killed, **new ones just happening to pop up defies the external knowledge of jewish ideological control of all communications systems**. The FCC was created, in part, to silence Father Coughlin. Johnson used a federal agency to silence another white group (whose name escapes me). Even Reagan pressured the… was it FTC? to do the same, and his handlers deregulated the media to consolidate all of it into just six jewish companies. All Internet search engines are run by jews, censoring anything they don’t like. In short, “If you know someone’s name on a national level, jews *allow* it to be known.”
With this in mind, and almost as a separate point to be made itself, I find it interesting (depressing?) that people are so captured by this scripted narrative. We have people here saying that **Fuentes** (irrespective of any other claims about his beliefs and behaviors; I don’t follow them because I don’t trust ‘heroes’ or ’spokesmen’ and therefore can’t comment on them) ***must*** **be a federal agent because he was allowed to speak to Carlson** (son of a CIA agent). Others are claiming that the existence of the interview means **Carlson** (again, son of a CIA agent and who read jewish scripts on jewish television for decades) **has become a white nationalist.**
I’ve seen a handful of their respective recent comments (completely out of context). It *looks* as though Fuentes is apologizing for jews, and Carlson is opposing ‘zionists.’ **Is this not exactly what the Protocols says the script should be?** To keep people in a constant state of confusion by creating rallying points around puppets, pitting them against each other, and then making the puppets’ views incoherent once people are ideologically captured, making them confused in themselves to make their thoughts and actions impotent? Because it feels a whole hell of a lot like that.
I don’t know. What do you think–not just about this specific example, but about the state of ‘leadership’ in general?
>So "racism" is already soon at a point of public acceptance.
When we get to the point that a white jury refuses to convict a white person of a “crime” under the Civil Rights Act, we might have something. Until then, you’ll still lose everything if you get called racist because private organizations will simply cut off your bank account and job and…
>If talking is worthless, what are you doing here attempting to stop us from even doing that little?
I’m here to stop you from talking in a way that gets you killed even faster.
>Why do you want us to do nothing
Who the hell said that?
>even though you argue
Why would you waste time saying that if you know what I actually argue?
>You say that we go extinct and all efforts are futile
We will go extinct because all *existing* efforts are futile.
>my prediction is that there will be NatSoc uprisings in the West
But what justification do you have for this belief? “It would be nice” is not a goddamned argument, and it’s 90% of what I see from people here.
>That we can use something unprecedented (the internet) to reach as many people as possible.
Ten years ago I would have agreed.
>What is even your goal?
Getting people to stop believing (and therefore behaving) like Qultists.
>With the same logic you can say that a bomb is harmless and nothing ever happens, and until it explodes you are 100% right. How would you feel if it explodes? Stupid?
Good analogy. Rebuttal: How do you know the bomb isn’t just an empty shell?
>For leftists it means making them look ridiculous or countering their nonsense with facts.
I don’t know about you, but I only do this as stress relief. They’re neurologically incapable of accepting truth, so any efforts in this regard are objectively wasted.
>Do you have any idea how much text I write that ends up unread? 80-90% of what I write goes into nothingness. Do you have any idea how frustrating it is?
[Not a clue.](https://i.postimg.cc/XvqHg5hf/length.png) You know what’s worse than not being read? Being read and then agreed with and then they don’t even remotely change their beliefs or behaviors afterward.
>The smartest thing is to do nothing.
Well that… sounds more like the strawman people make of me than something you should be saying.
>This is why your defeatism is so... annoying to me. Because being like you is something I would hate about myself.
You’re telling me.
>that mentality is not viable to have.
So “Keep doing things we *know* don’t work because someone warned us against doing them and that action hurt my feelings” is viable?
>And your one-liner above is just sad. Or do you think that was a good comment? It looks like you have to touch grass to detox from the computer.
Cool, so you refuse to do it or comprehend that it’s something that needs to happen among others or that it’s even a viable thing to do. ***No wonder I keep being proven right.*** *“What we’re doing is working, despite it self-evidently not working, because other white nationalists are begging us to stop!”* Fucking hell, man.
In fact it was already decided by the Allies in 1933 that war must be brought over Germany. Can you imagine the consequences of Germany prevailing in peace with such tremendous success? They catapulted themselves into a global superpower, enjoying an unprecedented economic-cultural recovery, and they wanted to make sure that they and their methods were demonized, thus never copied by others.
It's the same methods that are needed today btw.
---
See? These are the types of comments I make. High effort, low effect. But still more than 0. I also got quite proficient in circumventing the YouTube censorship algorithm. I do not see many comments like mine. And getting to a point where I can dish out these bad boys wasn't easy either.
I'm a fan of Tallest and Purest. You're both doing more than most.
Talking about [things like this](https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/1ARJvh7S93/reminder-that-a-gay-jew-priest-a/c) without having an active plan to do something about them is itself just demoralization propaganda. I think we might be better served by *only* acknowledging world events when we are able to say that we are not affected by them (because of innate aspects of our white lifestyles in which we’re already engaged), or if we have a plan in place to physically ignore them going forward. Otherwise there’s no point in acknowledging them, right?
The sad part is that this is all achievable on an individual level but it doesn't help that individual immediately or make them feel good so it just isn't done.
We would rather dig ditches for our replacements