Consume Product

>My suggestion is to improve your methods of communication with them.

I think it’s just that they’re not capable of understanding. I take them on the most roundabout routes imaginable. I say everything but who it is for as long as I can. *When they ask themselves, they don’t accept it.*

>Well, that's arguable. Nukes would be aimed at areas of high population density, meaning it would go after leftists primarily, and people in the outskirts and villages would survive.

Not without electricity. Not anymore.

>I am not sure if nukes would have secondary explosions, which could cause massive planetary radiation problems.

No; the explosion disperses all the radioactive material, of which there can’t be very much in the first place because a block no larger than roughly 10 pounds of U-238 will go critical on its own. You literally can’t bring too much of it together in one place. Plutonium has an even lower bound. The real problem after a nuke is the out of control fires that can’t be put out because you have no infrastructure, no fire trucks, and no electricity to pump it because the EMP affected a larger area than the bomb’s destruction. Ground detonation would throw up a shit ton of radiation; airburst not so much (look at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and compare them to some parts of Nevada where no one can go). There’s a reason almost all nukes today are designed to be airburst. What good is territory you’ve won in a war if you can’t conquer it afterward?

>Vance is a zionist shill created and groomed by Peter Thiel

Thank you. I suppose I can count on you to be a voice of reason now that he’s “speaking out against the jews” and “totally holding actual traditionalist viewpoints” by saying things like “Christianity good” and “maybe we should have infinity minus one browns entering the country.”

>Even now Trump is in a precarious situation, because he seeks peace

My brother in Christ. How can you think this.

>israel wants Democracy

Of course; *they created it.*

> “Unjust government can be exercised by a great number, and it is then called a democracy: such is mob rule when the common folk take advantage of their numbers to oppress the rich. In such a case the entire community becomes a sort of tyrant.” **~ St. Thomas Aquinas**; *On Princely Government; Aquinas: Selected Political Writings*; 1254

> “I do not say that democracy has been more pernicious on the whole, and in the long run, than monarchy or aristocracy. Democracy has never been and never can be so durable as aristocracy or monarchy; but while it lasts, it is more bloody than either… Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide. It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy. It is not true, in fact, and no where appears in history. Those passions are the same in all men under all forms of simple government, and when unchecked, produce the same effects of fraud, violence, and cruelty. When clear prospects are opened before vanity, pride, avarice or ambition, for their easy gratification, it is hard for the most considerate philosophers and the most conscientious moralists to resist the temptation. Individuals have conquered themselves, nations and large bodies of men, never.” **~ John Adams**; letter to John Taylor; December 17, 1814

> “That what is called democracy is always in fact plutocracy. The only alternative to the rule of the rich is to have a ruler who is deliberately made more powerful even than the rich. It is to have a ruler who is secure of his place, instead of rulers who are fighting for their place.” **~ G.K. Chesterton**; *The Revival of French Royalism*; December 15, 1923

> “The defect of democracy is its tendency to put mediocrity into power; and there is no way of avoiding this except by limiting office to men of ‘trained skill.’ Numbers by themselves cannot produce wisdom, and may give the best favors of office to the grossest flatterers. The fickle disposition of the multitude almost reduces those who have experience of it to despair; for it is governed solely by emotions, and not be reason. Thus democratic government becomes a procession of brief-lived demagogues, and men of worth are loath to enter lists where they must be judged and rated by their inferiors. Sooner or later the more capable men rebel against such a system, though they be in a minority. Hence I think it is that democracies change into aristocracies, and these at length into monarchies; people at last prefer tyranny to chaos.” **~ Will Durant**; *The Story of Philosophy*, p. 214; 1926

> “Democracy is now currently defined in Europe as ‘a country run by jews.’” **~ Ezra Pound**, poet and political critic; The Japan Times; 1934

> “There are many national issues that concern individuals and groups so directly and unmistakably as to evoke volitions that are genuine and definite enough. The most important instance is afforded by issues involving immediate and personal pecuniary profit to individual voters and groups of voters, such as direct payments, protective duties, silver policies and so on. Experience that goes back to antiquity shows that by and large voters react promptly and rationally to any such chance. But the classical doctrine of democracy evidently stands to gain little from displays of rationality of this kind. Voters thereby prove themselves bad and indeed corrupt judges of such issues, and often they even prove themselves bad judges of their own long-run interests, for it is only the short-run promise that tells politically and only short-run rationality that asserts itself effectively.” **~ Joseph A. Schumpeter**; *Capitalism, Socialism, & Democracy*, pp. 260-1; 1942

> “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy.” **~ Elmer T. Peterson**; *The Daily Oklahoman*, p. 12A; December 9, 1951

> “An unfortunate side effect of democracy is that it incentivizes citizens to be ignorant, irrational, tribalistic, and to not use their votes in very serious ways. We have to ask ourselves what we think government is actually for... There’s another way of looking at government, which is that it’s a tool, like a hammer, and the purpose of politics is to generate just and good outcomes, to generate efficiency and stability, and to avoid mistreating people... The idea is that anyone or any deliberative body that exercises power over anyone else has an obligation to use that power in good faith, and has the obligation to use that power competently. If they’re not going to use it in good faith, and they’re not going to use it competently, that’s a claim against them having any kind of authority or any kind of legitimacy.” **~ Dr. Jason Brennan**; political philosopher & applied ethicist; Epistocracy; *Vox*; November 9, 2018

>“Democracy has nothing to do with freedom. Democracy is a soft variant of communism, and rarely in the history of ideas has it been taken for anything else.” **~ Hans-Hermann Hoppe**; *The Paradox of Imperialism*; June 5, 2013

Anyway.