It's the jews nigga
(media.scored.co)
did a nazbol make this post?
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
6 comments:
5
19 days ago
5 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+5Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
The jewish question and the class question are just different words for the same damned thing. The jews are an issue, the bourgeoisie is an issue. Guess which ethnic group makes up an exorbitant amount of the bourgeoisie? They have long noses and silly hats, I'll tell you that much.
After feudalism ended up on its death bed and the system of mercantilism which would later become capitalism came into play around circa the discovery of the new world, the cunning jewish bourgeoisie, who once occupied a niche as lowly peddlers during more virtuous times, would find that they had accumulated a natural ability to manipulate this newfound system over the hundreds if not thousands of years that they had spent peddling snake oil and changing money across Europe and the middle east.
Mercantilism, as its name implies, was a system that greatly relied on the ability of the traders and merchants. Roles which jews filled under feudalism that had then gained new weight to throw around. The restrictions on jews in Europe were gradually lifted to acquire their expertise to enhance the wealth of european empires, particularly in the Netherlands and England (later the UK), but eventually virtually everywhere. With some exceptions, such as the Spanish empire. But there were not exceptions anymore in regards to capitalism.
Under capitalism, the evolution of mercantilism, under which the entire nations means of production and thus its capital are out of the hands of the former nobility, the jew found life even easier. Already being richer on average than the goyim due to their mastery of mercantilism, the jews would have a much easier time establishing themselves as manufacturers, landlords, bankers, and other greasy and miserable castes of society that popped into existence at the turn of the industrial revolution.
In places where capitalism had not happened yet, such as France most notably, the jew made sure that it happened (despite marx's adoration of the french revolution, it was not even remotely close to communism, at least not economically. It was a capitalist, liberal revolution whereby the bourgoeisie overthrew the nobility. The proletariat had absolutely no part in it). We have already seen the consequences of this. The jew would also make sure that England would end up with full economic liberalism after the "glorious" revolution, which limited the king to a ceremonial role only and established a private central bank in England.
So this is why "class consciousness" and the "jewish question" are the same thing. What communists notice about the bourgeoisie is entirely true and it is actually happening, but those bourgeoisie are either jews or in league with jews. Jews have been behind capitalism since before it was even born.
But do not deify the worldly jew. At the end of the day, they are still the creepy merchants in the town square from medieval times who live in hovels and have no power. The jew, in fact, would be incredibly easy to defeat if even a small minority of people rose up against them. They number about 15 million. 15 million sickly hypochondriacs who can't drink milk and have their fibromyalgia inflamed by breathing in stuffy air. There are 8 billion goyim in total, close to 1 billion white people. There is nothing to fear with the freaks. They exploited a niche that opened up with a new economic system and now lead due to people's fear that they cannot get rid of them.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
After feudalism ended up on its death bed and the system of mercantilism which would later become capitalism came into play around circa the discovery of the new world, the cunning jewish bourgeoisie, who once occupied a niche as lowly peddlers during more virtuous times, would find that they had accumulated a natural ability to manipulate this newfound system over the hundreds if not thousands of years that they had spent peddling snake oil and changing money across Europe and the middle east.
Mercantilism, as its name implies, was a system that greatly relied on the ability of the traders and merchants. Roles which jews filled under feudalism that had then gained new weight to throw around. The restrictions on jews in Europe were gradually lifted to acquire their expertise to enhance the wealth of european empires, particularly in the Netherlands and England (later the UK), but eventually virtually everywhere. With some exceptions, such as the Spanish empire. But there were not exceptions anymore in regards to capitalism.
Under capitalism, the evolution of mercantilism, under which the entire nations means of production and thus its capital are out of the hands of the former nobility, the jew found life even easier. Already being richer on average than the goyim due to their mastery of mercantilism, the jews would have a much easier time establishing themselves as manufacturers, landlords, bankers, and other greasy and miserable castes of society that popped into existence at the turn of the industrial revolution.
In places where capitalism had not happened yet, such as France most notably, the jew made sure that it happened (despite marx's adoration of the french revolution, it was not even remotely close to communism, at least not economically. It was a capitalist, liberal revolution whereby the bourgoeisie overthrew the nobility. The proletariat had absolutely no part in it). We have already seen the consequences of this. The jew would also make sure that England would end up with full economic liberalism after the "glorious" revolution, which limited the king to a ceremonial role only and established a private central bank in England.
So this is why "class consciousness" and the "jewish question" are the same thing. What communists notice about the bourgeoisie is entirely true and it is actually happening, but those bourgeoisie are either jews or in league with jews. Jews have been behind capitalism since before it was even born.
But do not deify the worldly jew. At the end of the day, they are still the creepy merchants in the town square from medieval times who live in hovels and have no power. The jew, in fact, would be incredibly easy to defeat if even a small minority of people rose up against them. They number about 15 million. 15 million sickly hypochondriacs who can't drink milk and have their fibromyalgia inflamed by breathing in stuffy air. There are 8 billion goyim in total, close to 1 billion white people. There is nothing to fear with the freaks. They exploited a niche that opened up with a new economic system and now lead due to people's fear that they cannot get rid of them.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
When the bourgeoisie are White Europeans who have faced minimal influence from, or competition by jews, they do things like Henry Ford did, trying to divvy up a larger share of his record profits with his workers because he respected what they did for his company. Of course his efforts to do that for his workers were stopped because investor jews sewed Henry and said the workers shouldn’t get anything extra out of the record profits they helped produce, all extra profits should go to the investors, even though the investors already made a profit off of their investment.
I’m sure there are some greedy White oligarchs out there, but I refuse to believe the majority of extremely wealthy Whites are in any way comparable to jews, I don’t believe they would intentionally harm their own people just to acquire more wealth in most cases….that’s a uniquely jewish behavior, although they aren’t harming other jews when they harm their host, the wealth and power usually goes toward personal greed and helping to grow jewish power even further.
I’m sure there are some greedy White oligarchs out there, but I refuse to believe the majority of extremely wealthy Whites are in any way comparable to jews, I don’t believe they would intentionally harm their own people just to acquire more wealth in most cases….that’s a uniquely jewish behavior, although they aren’t harming other jews when they harm their host, the wealth and power usually goes toward personal greed and helping to grow jewish power even further.
The only issue with capitalism, and by capitalism I specifically mean economic liberalism as described in, say, the wealth of nations (although state capitalism, market socialism, and corporatism are different cases) is that it will always drag jews in inevitably due to the inherent jewish savviness and mastery of it (after all, dutch jewry were the forefathers of the system in the Netherlands the same way marx was to communism. They just never wrote a handy book, so few know about it).
It takes a single corrupt and successful businessman to completely open the floodgates. And with lack of government oversight inherent to true, uncorrupted and unregulated capitalism, there are no stopgaps in place to deal with this. If you are a corrupt businessman, it is 100% in your interest to start giving concessions to jews because they will benefit you in the long term. Because they are good with money, because they are good at selling, because they are by their nature better at the scummy practices that give them and you an unfair edge. After all, they've been doing it for over 2000 years now, whites have been doing it for about 300. They know a thing or two. It is an inherently nebulous and globalist ideology.
Economic liberalism is pure and undiluted judaism. Read Ayn Rand. It is inherently selfish (and they know this), it is nebulous, it is internationalist. It is an ideology that exemplifies all the major traits of jewry. The wealth of nations was just a guide on how to not abuse the new system and a warning to not be a piece of shit. At least marxism was halfway theorized by an aryan man, engels, liberalism is purely from the minds of early enlightenment jews in England and the Netherlands.
That's why the 3rd position has always been, since its inception, fiercely anti liberal (economic and otherwise) above all else. It has almost always ranged from economically socialist to state capitalist. It has never been laissez Faire in its existence. Unless you count Pinochet or franco, but they were not actually third position in any way.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
It takes a single corrupt and successful businessman to completely open the floodgates. And with lack of government oversight inherent to true, uncorrupted and unregulated capitalism, there are no stopgaps in place to deal with this. If you are a corrupt businessman, it is 100% in your interest to start giving concessions to jews because they will benefit you in the long term. Because they are good with money, because they are good at selling, because they are by their nature better at the scummy practices that give them and you an unfair edge. After all, they've been doing it for over 2000 years now, whites have been doing it for about 300. They know a thing or two. It is an inherently nebulous and globalist ideology.
Economic liberalism is pure and undiluted judaism. Read Ayn Rand. It is inherently selfish (and they know this), it is nebulous, it is internationalist. It is an ideology that exemplifies all the major traits of jewry. The wealth of nations was just a guide on how to not abuse the new system and a warning to not be a piece of shit. At least marxism was halfway theorized by an aryan man, engels, liberalism is purely from the minds of early enlightenment jews in England and the Netherlands.
That's why the 3rd position has always been, since its inception, fiercely anti liberal (economic and otherwise) above all else. It has almost always ranged from economically socialist to state capitalist. It has never been laissez Faire in its existence. Unless you count Pinochet or franco, but they were not actually third position in any way.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
> What communists notice about the bourgeoisie is entirely true and it is actually happening, but those bourgeoisie are either jews or in league with jews.
True, but of course the communists don't see jews as the problem because jews created communism. They did it so they could control both sides of the argument like they always try to do. That's the real reason they had to stomp on Hitler and Mussolini so hard; third position-ism is a legitimate threat to their control.
True, but of course the communists don't see jews as the problem because jews created communism. They did it so they could control both sides of the argument like they always try to do. That's the real reason they had to stomp on Hitler and Mussolini so hard; third position-ism is a legitimate threat to their control.
Toast message