"An entirely fair question ..."
(twitter.com)
these fat pigs all deserve a hot bullet in their skull
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
29 comments:
10
20 days ago
10 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+10Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Why was he arrested at the end? Wtf
Remember the "don't taste me bro", same deal.
Everyone laughs at that guy for some reason, but all he did was ask a question, and he wasn't even rude when he did it.
Everyone laughs at that guy for some reason, but all he did was ask a question, and he wasn't even rude when he did it.
lol, “people are totally ready to fight back just keep waiting two more weeks they’re waking up goyim just you wait and see!”
people are ready, they understand once they start fighting their previous life will be completely destroyed, there is no going back.
I think people just want to be effective when they fight, they are ok with ending their previous life up until that point, but they want to have their desired outcome, they dont want to fight for nothing.
I think people just want to be effective when they fight, they are ok with ending their previous life up until that point, but they want to have their desired outcome, they dont want to fight for nothing.
Yeah. Even if you succeed in removing all kikes, you then have to remove all niggers, spics and leftists. And at the same time, you'll have to deal with foreign kikes coming in to steal the rest of the country. And that's not counting the shitskins and chinks that will also be taking advantage.
If you've done your job right, by the end, you'll be a soulless shell of your former self. And if you failed, you'll be dead, along with your country and children.
So, why would anyone look forward to doing that?
If you've done your job right, by the end, you'll be a soulless shell of your former self. And if you failed, you'll be dead, along with your country and children.
So, why would anyone look forward to doing that?
>their previous life will be completely destroyed
Not a single one of them could answer me if I asked in what way their previous lives have not already been destroyed. And they still do nothing.
Not a single one of them could answer me if I asked in what way their previous lives have not already been destroyed. And they still do nothing.
No one has to answer you dude. You're not the arbiter.
>And they still do nothing.
Then lead them.
>And they still do nothing.
Then lead them.
I think that for the normies (and really everyone,) the functional bar for "life not destroyed" is very low.
* Can you comfortably afford food and shelter?
* Are you able to access sex?
* Is your neighborhood safe *enough* that it is not South Africa (yet)?
* Is your job non-demanding *enough* that you can do it on autopilot while meeting all your expenses?
* Do you have sufficient opportunity to recreate/pursue personal passions?
As long as the answer to most of these questions remains a resounding yes, no one will risk their neck. Bread, circuses, etc.
And for anyone who has a family, the pressure to never do anything (that will actually fix the problems) is 10x stronger by default, irrespective of the above factors.
* Can you comfortably afford food and shelter?
* Are you able to access sex?
* Is your neighborhood safe *enough* that it is not South Africa (yet)?
* Is your job non-demanding *enough* that you can do it on autopilot while meeting all your expenses?
* Do you have sufficient opportunity to recreate/pursue personal passions?
As long as the answer to most of these questions remains a resounding yes, no one will risk their neck. Bread, circuses, etc.
And for anyone who has a family, the pressure to never do anything (that will actually fix the problems) is 10x stronger by default, irrespective of the above factors.
> Can you comfortably afford food and shelter?
Already isn’t true.
>Are you able to access sex?
Completely irrelevant.
>Is your neighborhood safe enough that it is not South Africa (yet)?
They don’t fight back in South Africa, so that’s meaningless.
>Is your job non-demanding enough that you can do it on autopilot while meeting all your expenses?
75% of the country lives paycheck to paycheck.
>Do you have sufficient opportunity to recreate/pursue personal passions?
This isn’t true for any but the top 10%.
Already isn’t true.
>Are you able to access sex?
Completely irrelevant.
>Is your neighborhood safe enough that it is not South Africa (yet)?
They don’t fight back in South Africa, so that’s meaningless.
>Is your job non-demanding enough that you can do it on autopilot while meeting all your expenses?
75% of the country lives paycheck to paycheck.
>Do you have sufficient opportunity to recreate/pursue personal passions?
This isn’t true for any but the top 10%.
> Already isn’t true.
> 75% of the country lives paycheck to paycheck.
For most people, it's true enough. If they can afford to live in their goyshack apartment with roommates on a retail salary, that's enough comfort to contain them. Especially so since the average person thinks nothing of taking on massive amounts of debt and doesn't care about never owning a house.
> Completely irrelevant.
It isn't. Sex is simultaneously a massive placating agent, and an industrial motivator. The total loss of even the illusion of its attainability would supercharge the sense that there is nothing left to lose, especially for men.
> They don’t fight back in South Africa, so that’s meaningless.
They're vastly outnumbered, so they couldn't even if they wanted to. We're about to be in the same boat. I'm saying that's how bad it would need to be *now* to inspire action, but by the time it's actually that bad it will be too late.
> This isn’t true for any but the top 10%.
Most people's recreation is bibeo game, marble movies, and drink that makes them feel dizzy. All that fits in a wagecuck weekend.
> 75% of the country lives paycheck to paycheck.
For most people, it's true enough. If they can afford to live in their goyshack apartment with roommates on a retail salary, that's enough comfort to contain them. Especially so since the average person thinks nothing of taking on massive amounts of debt and doesn't care about never owning a house.
> Completely irrelevant.
It isn't. Sex is simultaneously a massive placating agent, and an industrial motivator. The total loss of even the illusion of its attainability would supercharge the sense that there is nothing left to lose, especially for men.
> They don’t fight back in South Africa, so that’s meaningless.
They're vastly outnumbered, so they couldn't even if they wanted to. We're about to be in the same boat. I'm saying that's how bad it would need to be *now* to inspire action, but by the time it's actually that bad it will be too late.
> This isn’t true for any but the top 10%.
Most people's recreation is bibeo game, marble movies, and drink that makes them feel dizzy. All that fits in a wagecuck weekend.
That is true, but people throughout their life end up working within the system however shitty it is and have a hard time giving that up [mammon, and a peaceful cage].
The sheer weight of the sunken cost fallacy is absolutely crippling to people. They don’t want to give up the narrative on which they were raised, because the idea that *their entire life was a complete lie and everything they ever did was directly in contradiction to their own health and spiritual well-being* is often too much to accept. They’ll just reject what you say off-hand for no reason other than that. They don’t want to admit to themselves that their lives, their parents’ lives, and their grandparents’ sacrifices in war… was for absolutely nothing.
Unrelated, do you think SNAP being cut off could kick things off finally ALA fake toilet paper shortage channeled into food stuffs?
That would be nice, but it’ll take more than a single month of lacking a single form of welfare.
I definitely used to think it would be a major catalyst, but the interconnection of various “totally not government funded” organizations is now so broad that they could simply ship food out of white regions and into nonwhite regions to maintain control.
I definitely used to think it would be a major catalyst, but the interconnection of various “totally not government funded” organizations is now so broad that they could simply ship food out of white regions and into nonwhite regions to maintain control.
Taking food, that's a cut that'll bleed hard, though. They'd have to use visible force like Stalin, and I don't honestly think they're at that point of control on the media and/or population for it to happen without massive amounts of military to counter the resistance.
Just waiting on the loss of rule of law. Same as we've been for years now.
The rule of law stopped existing in 1913. You’re waiting for something that happened 120 years ago. You’ve been enslaved for longer than you’ve been alive. There is no “collapse” and never will be. You don’t get it.
Toast message