New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
fourleaved on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
So that'll be a no, then
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Your question is irrelevant to the topic. You can search that site if you really want.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
fourleaved on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You're demanding a scriptural basis for a particular practice. But you can't provide a scriptural basis for what is and isn't scripture.

The reality is, a Church developed the canon of scripture as part of its tradition.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Give what I linked a listen and you might start to understand why that's not a good approach to Scripture.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
fourleaved on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
How do you trust the traditions of men to give you a complete and unaltered canon of scripture? Do you have a real answer to that, or do you just pretend it's not a tradition?
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Why would I trust the traditions of men for that? The method described in the link is different, just give it a listen.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Continue thread...
Toast message