1 month ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)3 children
Even in tip top shape, you cannot defend yourself against multiple niggers with their cheap shots. Make sure you carry and practice often drawing. Niggers cannot shoot straight after a few yards of distance
You are correct, but I don’t think the question is meant to be taken 100% literal. Basically that young man/kid in his current state would be fucked even if he had a gun. He’s not mentally fit to accept the reality that is, and behave accordingly in that moment. You can tell by his goofy cavalier behavior and how he has to be calmed down by GS.
1 month ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)2 children
It's violence desensitizing training. You will never get a boomer to hate, you will never get a boomer to kill. A gamer on the other hand, they already think that killing to fix things is pretty ok.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Either cope or ignorance.
As the other commenter said, firearms training and especially combat sports are more effective at conditioning a man to real violence than video games could ever be. You seem to be describing one's *willingness to enact* violence in the abstract, which should be a function of ideology first.
I guarantee you that a Spartan boy was more willing and able to enact violence in practice than any modern right wing gamer today.
Who am I attacking? This *is* the recruitment campaign.
Get off the do-nothing dopamine carousel and engage in activity that will meaningfully enhance your ability to fight rather than just fantasize about it. Anyone who won't even entertain that idea isn't worth recruiting anyways.
> Boomers
The boomers who *were* capable of violence were the ones who practiced real skills related to it. Combat veterans and the like. Gamers are analogous to boomers who watched UFC and war documentaries but never actually got off their asses.
I agree, but let’s not pretend that pound for pound gaming isn’t one of the easiest, and cheapest hobbies to get into. Shooting in comparison is very expensive. Shit, shooting, especially now, is very expensive. Even just shooting 22 is more expensive than gaming. You have to remember, that most young people, and people in general are poor as fuck in mOOdern times.
1 month ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
🎯
"Barely above pornography" is pretty much exactly what I was about to say. It's the other side of that coin.
Video games are degenerate because they consume massive quantities of bandwidth even in modest doses—for absolutely zero meaningful real world reward. Hours and hours of time and vitality pissed away into a digital void.
Where internet pornography is a hollow simulacrum of the sexual reward men are wired to chase, video games are the parallel fiend that hijack a man's drive to climb, conquer, and achieve greatness.
1 month ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)2 children
> "Barely above pornography" is pretty much exactly what I was about to say. It's the other side of that coin.
So books, chess, bird watching, painting, nature walks and enjoying a cup of tea are all just a stones throw away from cranking it to porn...
The deep character arcs of Raziel and Kain are akin to an anal gangbang, and Mein Kampf is really a lesbian orgy...
Give me a fucking break. You don't throw an entire industry or entire genre of art away because some slimy kike makes snake oil inside it. [You make superior art.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyq9UFKXi3c)
I think both of you guys are partially right. Gaming like some people do, is close to porn. I’m not talking about the guys who hop in chat to hook up with their frens sometimes to bullshit and talk about most recent events and shit while playing a military shooter. I’m talking about the guys who get on, often times by themselves, to chase after that next RNG upgrade and grind, and grind, and grind for that dopamine. That is definitely a real, and still relatively new phenomenon that is definitely closer to porn, and is fucking young people up IMHO.
Once again, like so many things in life, it’s all in how you use it, and moderation of source. This is coming from someone who has no interest in gaming anymore after a 10 year hiatus. I literally just had a buddy call me and tell me he’ll build me a new PC if I give him the money to play the new battlefield with him. He even offered to buy the game for me as a birthday present. It’s “sad”, I just don’t have that urge, annd desire anymore. I told him I’ll hop on chat and bullshti with him. He said yeah, but that’s just not the same. I do sometimes remember the good time we had on bad company, and battlefield 3/4, but it passes pretty quick.
>books, chess, bird watching, painting, nature walks and enjoying a cup of tea are all just a stones throw away from cranking it to porn...
No, there is a fundamental and critical difference between the two.
All of the things you listen are active. *You* have to set up the chess board, create the image of the writing, or actually get out and walk.
Video games are passive. Even though you are pushing buttons you are entering a world that has been created for you, purely for entertainment. You are not active in creating or visualizing this world, you are a passive participant. That's the danger; that you become accustomed to everything in your life being ordered, by someone else, for your benefit.
Are there beneficial side effects? Sure. As you mentioned, video games are good at presenting narratives and spreading culture, and there's some evidence to suggest that they improve things like spacial reasoning.
But for every benefit, there's a risk. Because they present completely synthetic worlds, up to an including physics, video games can just as easily present evil ideas as good. Sitting around improving spacial sense doesn't provide excercise, like other methods do, and doesn't produce anything, like woodworking or even 3d print design would.
In short, video games have a high likelyhood of wasting your time, which is one of the biggest issues with porn.
It depends on the types of games your playing, what your goals are, if you’re playing with frens in chat? Only after those questions can you compare them to porn IMHO. On top of all that shooters especially are amazing for hand eye coordination IMHO.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
> No, there is a fundamental and critical difference between the two.
There really isn't.
> All of the things you listen are active. You have to set up the chess board, create the image of the writing, or actually get out and walk.
> Video games are passive. Even though you are pushing buttons you are entering a world that has been created for you, purely for entertainment. You are not active in creating or visualizing this world, you are a passive participant. That's the danger; that you become accustomed to everything in your life being ordered, by someone else, for your benefit.
You've contradicted yourself so severely, I'm just going to let this hang here. No. Videogames are not a passive process. You're completely wrong.
What you're actually afraid of is low IQ people being subject to long nose propaganda.
> But for every benefit, there's a risk.
That's life, my friend. Almost anything good can be turned and used for evil. *"It's a Kingdom of conscious. Or nothing."* It's up to the singular individual, down to the common man, to hold his own soul in good standing.
> Sitting around improving spacial sense doesn't provide excercise, like other methods do, and doesn't produce anything, like woodworking or even 3d print design would.
You're missing the point of art, and the enjoyment of it. You're not supposed to produce anything when walking through an art museum, reading a book or listening to music.
I'm not saying you have to pull profound understanding and deep personal insights out of every gaming session, as I'm sure many pieces of art get walked straight by in an art museum.
But it's up to the individual. How do you know what will spark inspiration? Creativity? The excitement of discovery? How do you know what will kickstart and expand someone's imagination?
Yes. There are titty mags, pornos and smut. But there's also The Lord of the Rings. You don't throw away the good because of the bad.
I haven’t games in ten years, but I disagree about the comparison to pornography unless you’re talking about the losers who play by themselves all the time to grind on whatever bullshit loot or upgrade the fpgames entice you with. If you use gaming to jump in chat, and bullshit, and talk shop a few hours a week, I think it’s actually healthy as long as you have everything else in order. I look at it as the equivalent of when our parents would get together to play cards/poker while talking shit. With that said, how many people have their lives in order enough to waste more than a couple of hours a week on gaming? I’m talking they lift at least three times a week, and or spend at least an hour a day doing things with their kids if they have any. I’d bet it’s less than 50% for sure.
I just push a controller cable into my ear far enough until it makes me giggle and I can pretend to enjoy pixels and pushing buttons in a hitbox. My mammy comes to feed me my Ritalin dino nuggets and wipe my nose.
I’m torn, because I know way too many people who still use it for that quick dopamine escape from reality hit on the daily for hours regularly while never lifting, and sacrificing sleep to game more. If you’re out of shape, and have young kids, and you game more than a couple of hours a week to hook up with, and stay connected to frens in chat, you’re doing yourself, and your children a disservice IMHO.
Now if you want to game with your son when he gets old enough to play shooters or whatever, then it can become more of a regular thing as long as you, and your son/children are getting plenty of regular physical activity, and staying fit. Unfortunately this is extremely rare today in my experience. I know of someone right now that has a five foot nine year old that weighs over 200lbs right now. All he, and his dad do is play video games. It’s disgusting, and it’s child abuse.
1 month ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
TBF, I don’t think too many people under 30 or maybe 35 are under any illusion that they’ll ever find anything decent anyway. I think that’s why so many have overly lost themselves in gaming, and other distractions in general.
1 month ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
Creating and participating in art is how you win culture. Videogames are quickly becoming the dominant form of art for the west, and there is nothing wrong with participating in it in moderation. The jewish and leftist control over art has been responsible for why we lost the culture war (until just recently, as videogames took over). Someone who dresses as a capeshit villain should understand that.
Until the shooting starts, we need the right wing to be writing books, and making TV shows, and making videogames. And that starts with them reading and watching and playing games. It's not mutually exclusive with having kids and building wealth, and all of those contribute to us *being able* to start shooting, because we have more people and more power on our side.
I agree. Gaming should only be something you fall back on in order to hook up with frens and shoot the shit in chat when there is absolutely nothing else of value you need to get done. The problem is, different people value different things. I know people who give up sleep in order to game longer. That’s some fucked up shit IMHO.
This kid can turn himself around. But right now he is exactly the type who will be posting about "how I escaped the alt-right" in a couple years. You can see how he doesn't take anything seriously and is just in it for the lulz.
There seems to be two types of people who get into dissident culture and humor:
1) Guys who like it because saying nigger is edgy.
2) Guy who have been semi-aware of the shit situation we are in but needed something to snap them out of normie brainwashing.
For the former, it is about humor and entertainment. The connection is often weak and they will move on to the next thing once the novelty wears off. For the latter, the humor is cathartic and allows the release of years of quiet frustration or confusion.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
The amount of nothing you have to do to become fat is so astounding I probably wouldn't be able to do it if it saved my life, how braindead do you have to be to stand eating that much garbage while moving so little?
You just described most people. I’m gonna tell you though, it can happen more insidiously than you think without you really knowing it when you have people around you refusing to tell you the truth. I’m a perfect example. I’m in shape now, but I went through almost a decade of slowly putting on weight after being athletic and strong in my younger years. What happens in my case is I had an undiagnosed injury that I couldn’t get any help with, and could no longer lift, so I couldn’t keep muscle on, and I kept eating the same amount of calories(healthy calories), but didn’t think about how much less I needed since I wasn’t lifting, and running/sprinting anymore. I was still a big guy with broad shoulders, so people would just lie to me, and say I hold it well when in reality my waist was huge now. The problem was, people being overly nice, and I was still smaller, and built better than many people in the south. My case of course is an exception to the rule. Most people have never moved and/or been athletic, and always eat goyslop. I don’t know how they do it. When I was big and could t do the physical things I wanted to do, I literally went insane for a few years. I look at all these inactive people who loathe moving, and it disgusts me.
At least if it’s a sports car, and they take it out regularly and maybe even hit the track once every six months, that’s understandable, but how many people actually do that. I mostly see people in 100k suvs and jacked up trucks now that they use to get grocery and pick up the kids. Just get a fucking minivan for 40k faggot.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
36 years old?
And he decides to dress up like a pastiche of a fictional edgelord from a 17 year old film, which in turn originates from a comic book aimed at 7 year old boys, all the while getting successfully ragebaited by someone half his age who's just laughing at him.
Bet the badass act would cease in an instant the second you raised a loaded firearm in his general direction. Apparently he couldn't even take a horde of trantifa on without ducking and bailing. So not even worthy of Rittenhouse-tier respect.
Hand-to-hand is strictly for boys growing up or learning a fight style in college. Its only practical application is in human cockfighting competitions where you get dementia by your 38th birthday and need a wheelchair by your 50th. Real men carry and learn to become proficient in the ways of the gun.
Who is this faggot anyway?
>Paul Nicholas Miller (born August 11, 1988), better known as GypsyCrusader,[a] is an American white supremacist internet personality[4] of Mexican and Romani ancestry.
**BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA**
**HOLY SHIT**
**HOLY FUCKING SHIT**
**THE GUY'S A LITERAL GYPSPIC RAPE BABY AHAHAHAHAHA**
No wife or family by the looks of things either, though that's perhaps for the best in this mutt's case. By 36, you should ideally be at least settled and on the greater side of 10 children. So all he does is posture, run away from fights, and mock teenagers on the internet. What a role model.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
You guys need to stop the extreme purity test. To the averge normy, and especially nigger, they see that man as one of us. The enemy of good is perfect. He passes my 80/20 rule in spades. Pun intended.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
I mean the following with all due respect and no hostility, since you're a Cajun brother:
>You guys need to stop the extreme purity test
Lack of "purity testing/spiraling" is what got us here to begin with, brother. It's what allowed the jews in and by proxy of them, the other non-Whites. (Niggers, spics, etc.)
> To the averge normy
Doesn't matter since they've refused to wake up, refuse to take correct action and see us as the enemy anyway.
Our current numbers are *more* than enough, but we refuse to do anything with them and behave correctly, anyway.
> and especially nigger, they see that man as one of us
Yeah, but when did we ever start caring about what niggers think?
> The enemy of good is perfect
Right, but no one said anything about that. Wanting to keep the White race *pure* (As in, no non-White blood) does not necessarily mean perfect. Only Christ and God can be perfect, anyway.
> He passes my 80/20 rule in spades
My brother in Christ, It's called the ***White*** race, not the "mostly White race". Most of us follow the *one-drop rule*.
If, for example, Paul were 20% nigger instead and you could actually see the negroid features on his face - is he still "White"? That's not even getting into the mystery meat color of the skin.
It's great if mystery meats like him spreads our ideas and propaganda - no one's against that or stopping that, but they can't join us and be with us and they have no right to tell one of our own what to do - even if he *is* correct on the matter.
Instead of guys like him, build up *actual* Whites who say the same things as him, if not better.
People here often talk about "tribing and training", but too soon do they forget what the "tribe" part actually entails.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
“Lack of "purity testing/spiraling" is what got us here to begin with, brother. It's what allowed the jews in and by proxy of them, the other non-Whites. (Niggers, spics, etc.)”
I agree, but there’s a balance. What we have going on now is much different than even five to ten years ago IMHO. Before we had people not PTing at all, and still a lot of the “I don’t care what others are doing as long as it does t affect me” AKA live, and let live. That’s fucking retarded, and always has been I’m also mostly talking about our felow frens here including me, and you who are already way further along on our nOOticing journey than even your averge person who is/leans right. It seems here many people are super impatient, and deeply blackpilled(I know my name😁) that they can’t even allow for the 80/20 rule anymore within our own ranks.
What I mean is I have groomed, and transitioned(both those words feel so dirty now) quite a few cuckservatives/normies, and even a “liberal” who leaned slightly right on a few things where I consider them 80/20s now. I guess what I’m saying is if they’re white, and at least willing to listen without going full retard, it’s worth a shot. As long as someone isn’t completely hostile towards me for some of the shit I say, I’ll usually be willing to give them some information, and hope it sticks to the back of their skull to mull over later.
“Yeah, but when did we ever start caring about what niggers think?”
I don’t personally, but unfortunately, many young whites still do. I’m also just stating a fact that many people often forget, and I think it’s good to always understand how others see us just from a tactical, and pragmatic point. Niggers are simpletons, and easy to understand, and read, but because of this we often times take them for granted, and underestimate their wide reach to everyone including whites thanks to kikes pushing them in all mainstream media formats. Sports, and music are the biggest two by far.
“My brother in Christ, It's called the White race, not the "mostly White race". Most of us follow the one-drop rule.
If, for example, Paul were 20% nigger instead and you could actually see the negroid features on his face - is he still "White"? That's not even getting into the mystery meat color of the skin.
It's great if mystery meats like him spreads our ideas and propaganda - no one's against that or stopping that, but they can't join us and be with us and they have no right to tell one of our own what to do - even if he is correct on the matter.
Instead of guys like him, build up actual Whites who say the same things as him, if not better.
People here often talk about "tribing and training", but too soon do they forget what the "tribe" part actually entails.”
First off when I say 80/20 rule, I’m not talking about race. I’m always talking about ideal, morals, and general constitution on life. Just wanted to get that out of the way.
I agree in theory, and hopefully in the future, but I understand, that we live in an extremely imperfect world, and situation right now, and what you want(I want the same), won’t happen overnight, IF AT ALL, and along the way we will run across some strange characters, and bedfellows.
Random thoughts on gaming but maybe some moderate gaming that requires hand-eye coordination could be ok. For the mental aspect: puzzle games, strategy like chess or go, trivia. Direct gaming impulse in some "good" direction?
With fitness the guy has a gym, just needs a routine / training plan to make use of it