Ask any normie to define what fascism is and they can't
(media.scored.co)
Which one is it when jews take the cross by claiming gay churches are christian?
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
26 comments:
Truest meme on earth….any move, even just organizing people together who oppose Jewish agendas is considered fascism….go figure
Fascism is putting people before profit, making a nation state work for the benefit of its people. This includes preserving the culture, identity, and the environment.
Capitalism and communism are two faces of the same coin: they both make the economy rule over people. They are materialistic worldviews for which the organization of the means of production is the only thing that matters.
Capitalism and communism are two faces of the same coin: they both make the economy rule over people. They are materialistic worldviews for which the organization of the means of production is the only thing that matters.
I’m well aware of what fascism actually is. I always found it funny how everybody misinterprets what it is to simply be a merger of the corporations and state, as if fascism is corporations dictating state policy when fascism is the polar opposite. Corporatocracy is what results out of capitalism without limits, the corporate mergers lead to so much wealth and corporate power that they basically become the state, and if they buy enough politicians, they do in fact become the state so only their needs are met. Fascism is the removal of corporate and oligarch power, the state dictates what the people’s needs are, and any oligarch or corporation who gets in the way of what’s best for the people will either be shutdown or nationalized so it will run in consonance with the people’s needs.
You are well informed. *Corporatocracy* is the correct term.
The misconception exists because when Mussolini talked, in Italian, about "corporativismo", in English it was translated as *corporatism* which in English sounds similar to "corporation". So all the imbeciles in the English speaking world started to think that it's about giving power to corporations.
Corporatism is the system in which representatives of labor, employers, and the state (the latter representing the collective interests of the nation) come together to negotiate and agree the conditions of employment and economic activities. It's Mussolini's way to overcome the class warfare theorized by Marx, which in capitalism is resolved by the free market.
So ironically capitalism is closer to Marx than fascism is, even in the economy.
The misconception exists because when Mussolini talked, in Italian, about "corporativismo", in English it was translated as *corporatism* which in English sounds similar to "corporation". So all the imbeciles in the English speaking world started to think that it's about giving power to corporations.
Corporatism is the system in which representatives of labor, employers, and the state (the latter representing the collective interests of the nation) come together to negotiate and agree the conditions of employment and economic activities. It's Mussolini's way to overcome the class warfare theorized by Marx, which in capitalism is resolved by the free market.
So ironically capitalism is closer to Marx than fascism is, even in the economy.
And you used a picture of a Socialist behind it.
I think you've lost the plot.
Should have used Mussolini.
I think you've lost the plot.
Should have used Mussolini.
National Socialism isn't socialism, and Nazis were fascists. They picked up the torch and did more with it.
State owned industry isn't fascist. It's socialist. It turns out they knew what they were doing when they named themselves.
National Socialism fits every criteria of the definition of fascism. What definition are you using? Outline it clearly.
If you nationalize industries and bring them under control of the state you are a socialist. There is no other way to understand this.
Fascism in and of itself does not require this.
Nor does it require single party rule or the disbandment of elections and parliament.
Mussolini > Hitler.
Fascism in and of itself does not require this.
Nor does it require single party rule or the disbandment of elections and parliament.
Mussolini > Hitler.
Toast message
I bet not even half the people using the term "fascism" have ever heard of Giovanni Gentile...
Adolf Hitler was the most influential man of the last millennia, but he was just a man. He could make people do things only through consent. No large organization, let alone a nation state, can depend and be ruled by only one individual.
Literally my last suggestion on improving the situation in America was to kill off the most problematic half the population and I wasn't even going for the Thanos comparison. If this generation views great men like fictional characters then perhaps I can be perceived in a similar light if I play into that insane ambition and air of superiority they expect
This is why Hitler is such a power symbol.
If the Jews were smart, they would have never mentioned Hitler again after WWII and he would have fallen into obscurity like Wilhelm II.
Also, people just gloss over Luigi's involvement, even though they whinge about 'fascism', which he basically invented.