What does your DNA test result mean? (Varg is back)
(www.youtube.com)
Don't take DNA tests
Don't give your DNA to anyone
Don't give your DNA to anyone
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
14 comments:
i'm 99% sure all the DNA companies are owned by Yids so they can slice our DNA with theirs
much like the aliens in many Sci-fi games the whole DNA thing is not to preserve our genes, but to manipulate them to (((their advantage)))
after the White genocide is complete the jews are going to run a bio-virus to target all shitskins and in the aftermath (of TSD) they'll create a clone class of White goyim mixed with jews to be the next inheritors of technology
alongside their slave caste jeets and their chink allies (who worship jews)
much like the aliens in many Sci-fi games the whole DNA thing is not to preserve our genes, but to manipulate them to (((their advantage)))
after the White genocide is complete the jews are going to run a bio-virus to target all shitskins and in the aftermath (of TSD) they'll create a clone class of White goyim mixed with jews to be the next inheritors of technology
alongside their slave caste jeets and their chink allies (who worship jews)
I'm 100% sure they are doing this. They think they can create golems and that science trumps God. They are stupid in this way. I know enough science to know there is no hope in it for a better life!
RE DNA: I'm also 100% sure that DNA isn't even a significant factor in life. There's too many other variables. And we know, for a fact, that environmental conditions can CHANGE how the DNA is "read".
To wit, if I can guarantee a calf gets strong colostrum at birth, that calf will almost inevitably grow healthy and strong. If a calf can't get good colostrum at birth, say the cow is stressed or forage is short or whatever, then the calf is not going to do very well. While I use genetics in my herd and such, it is not the entire story so I don't put all my eggs in that basket. I'd rather take animals that grew up with strong parents than ones with impeccable, pure-bred lineages. I'm counting more on forage and the breeding cycle than getting a good bull or cow to breed.
This is also why I tell people with "bad genetics" that they should still get married and have kids. If they raise their kids right, if they pay attention to the health of the mother, for instance, eating folic acid before conception and such, their kids are going to be strong and healthy.
RE DNA: I'm also 100% sure that DNA isn't even a significant factor in life. There's too many other variables. And we know, for a fact, that environmental conditions can CHANGE how the DNA is "read".
To wit, if I can guarantee a calf gets strong colostrum at birth, that calf will almost inevitably grow healthy and strong. If a calf can't get good colostrum at birth, say the cow is stressed or forage is short or whatever, then the calf is not going to do very well. While I use genetics in my herd and such, it is not the entire story so I don't put all my eggs in that basket. I'd rather take animals that grew up with strong parents than ones with impeccable, pure-bred lineages. I'm counting more on forage and the breeding cycle than getting a good bull or cow to breed.
This is also why I tell people with "bad genetics" that they should still get married and have kids. If they raise their kids right, if they pay attention to the health of the mother, for instance, eating folic acid before conception and such, their kids are going to be strong and healthy.
There have been no non-whites in my family tree nor have they been introduced. Even my generational cousins and second cousins have been staying pure and not mixing and most are not even aware of white genocide or the JQ. I feel very fortunate and also see this as rare given the state of this kiked world.
u/TallestSkil what's your thoughts on that? Also, the chart of who Hitler and the National Socialists considered White/European would be handy here.
Watching the video... he has a very subtle point.
let me try to explain it mathematically.
Suppose there are what, 4 billion base pairs in the human DNA.
You inherit half of them from your mother and half from your father. They inherit half from their parents, so you get 1/4 from your grandparents. And 1/8 from your great-grandparents and so on.
4 billions is about 2^32, so after 32 generations (roughly 800 years more or less) you are only inheriting 1 gene from your ancestors. Anyone beyond that, there is a good chance, 50% or more, that you inherit NONE of their base-pairs. Let me repeat that: Pick one your ancestors from 33 generations onward, and there's a good chance you share NONE of their DNA with them.
Obviously, this isn't how DNA really works. It isn't just base pairs being shared randomly, but sequences, and those sequences are much smaller in number than 4 billion. Let's say the average length of a sequence is 128 base pairs, or 2^7. That means that after 25 generations or 625 years your ancestors only contribute 1 sequence. Anyone beyond that is likely to contribute nothing to your DNA.
When you look at things this way, you can pretty much draw a line to around 500 years ago and say "No one born before this time matters to my DNA." and you'd be right. So people living before 1500 AD are only related to you by documentation, not by DNA. Our ancestors from the Middle Ages are completely unrelated to us by DNA.
OK, let's look at things a little differently. Suppose you and your mother had a DNA test, and they examined how the DNA corresponds to each other. Only half of your DNA comes from her, so it's going to be a 50% match. You and your grandmother only share 25% of your DNA, so it's a 25% match. Your great-grandmother only shares 12.5% of her DNA with you, so it's a 12.5% match. Meaning, only 1/8 of your DNA matches your great grandmother. As you go back further and further in time, you are less and less related to your ancestors.
Now, you might say that the other half, coming from your father, would match your mother if your father and mother were related, and this is true. So let's ask this question: how closely do you match with your siblings and cousins? Siblings (sharing parents) only match about 50% of the time. Cousins (sharing grandparents)? 25% of the time. Second cousins (sharing a great grandparent)? 12.5% of the time. And so on.
The point is this: your relationship with a person, the further up the family tree you go, means less and less DNA will match. In fact, at some point, you'll get stronger matches with all but complete strangers who just randomly happened to share sequences with you through some fluke of nature.
In reality, people aren't marrying perfect strangers. Cousins marry cousins all too often in history. Certainly second or third cousins end up marrying just by virtue of the fact that people didn't typically travel very far before automobiles. So in reality, you'd have communities that were more or less closed with second and third cousins marrying each other, sometimes unwittingly. This creates a sort of pattern in those communities. You're borrowing DNA from your mother or father, but if your mother and father share DNA, you're guaranteed to get that shared DNA. Because of these more or less closed communities, it is possible to identify as a member of one of these groups.
But nowadays, this is all but impossible, since the human race has been mixing up for many generations now. Starting with the age of exploration in the 1500s and rapidly accelerating from there, various cultures that were once isolated are now mixed. For instance, in my family tree, I am literally related to Pocahontas. Someone white married her sister or cousin or something, and after so many generations, my family line ended up being connected with theirs. (I can't tell you how -- I just know that it is.) And this is true for virtually everyone.
Had we remained in isolation from each other, then this mixing would have been happening at a much slower rate.
The net result of this is that despite the fact that I can trace my fathers' and mother's lineage through to Anglo-Saxon times, there has been enough mixing that I'm also related to various Indian tribes and others too. If there is a community I belong to, it's possibly "American" which is possibly a large subset of "European". I've probably got tons of German and French ancestors, along with Italians or Irish as well. Just because my fathers fathers and mothers fathers came from England doesn't mean all of my ancestors did.
let me try to explain it mathematically.
Suppose there are what, 4 billion base pairs in the human DNA.
You inherit half of them from your mother and half from your father. They inherit half from their parents, so you get 1/4 from your grandparents. And 1/8 from your great-grandparents and so on.
4 billions is about 2^32, so after 32 generations (roughly 800 years more or less) you are only inheriting 1 gene from your ancestors. Anyone beyond that, there is a good chance, 50% or more, that you inherit NONE of their base-pairs. Let me repeat that: Pick one your ancestors from 33 generations onward, and there's a good chance you share NONE of their DNA with them.
Obviously, this isn't how DNA really works. It isn't just base pairs being shared randomly, but sequences, and those sequences are much smaller in number than 4 billion. Let's say the average length of a sequence is 128 base pairs, or 2^7. That means that after 25 generations or 625 years your ancestors only contribute 1 sequence. Anyone beyond that is likely to contribute nothing to your DNA.
When you look at things this way, you can pretty much draw a line to around 500 years ago and say "No one born before this time matters to my DNA." and you'd be right. So people living before 1500 AD are only related to you by documentation, not by DNA. Our ancestors from the Middle Ages are completely unrelated to us by DNA.
OK, let's look at things a little differently. Suppose you and your mother had a DNA test, and they examined how the DNA corresponds to each other. Only half of your DNA comes from her, so it's going to be a 50% match. You and your grandmother only share 25% of your DNA, so it's a 25% match. Your great-grandmother only shares 12.5% of her DNA with you, so it's a 12.5% match. Meaning, only 1/8 of your DNA matches your great grandmother. As you go back further and further in time, you are less and less related to your ancestors.
Now, you might say that the other half, coming from your father, would match your mother if your father and mother were related, and this is true. So let's ask this question: how closely do you match with your siblings and cousins? Siblings (sharing parents) only match about 50% of the time. Cousins (sharing grandparents)? 25% of the time. Second cousins (sharing a great grandparent)? 12.5% of the time. And so on.
The point is this: your relationship with a person, the further up the family tree you go, means less and less DNA will match. In fact, at some point, you'll get stronger matches with all but complete strangers who just randomly happened to share sequences with you through some fluke of nature.
In reality, people aren't marrying perfect strangers. Cousins marry cousins all too often in history. Certainly second or third cousins end up marrying just by virtue of the fact that people didn't typically travel very far before automobiles. So in reality, you'd have communities that were more or less closed with second and third cousins marrying each other, sometimes unwittingly. This creates a sort of pattern in those communities. You're borrowing DNA from your mother or father, but if your mother and father share DNA, you're guaranteed to get that shared DNA. Because of these more or less closed communities, it is possible to identify as a member of one of these groups.
But nowadays, this is all but impossible, since the human race has been mixing up for many generations now. Starting with the age of exploration in the 1500s and rapidly accelerating from there, various cultures that were once isolated are now mixed. For instance, in my family tree, I am literally related to Pocahontas. Someone white married her sister or cousin or something, and after so many generations, my family line ended up being connected with theirs. (I can't tell you how -- I just know that it is.) And this is true for virtually everyone.
Had we remained in isolation from each other, then this mixing would have been happening at a much slower rate.
The net result of this is that despite the fact that I can trace my fathers' and mother's lineage through to Anglo-Saxon times, there has been enough mixing that I'm also related to various Indian tribes and others too. If there is a community I belong to, it's possibly "American" which is possibly a large subset of "European". I've probably got tons of German and French ancestors, along with Italians or Irish as well. Just because my fathers fathers and mothers fathers came from England doesn't mean all of my ancestors did.
That's not true tho, its not as if you don't hold DNA from people that far ago, its that there is less and less monopoly over a larger part of your genome per ancestor. But every single strand of DNA you have is inherited from that long ago, the dominant selected genes passed down like a baton through the ages.
So you might not get much per individual, but what you do have is a direct line down through the ages.
So you might not get much per individual, but what you do have is a direct line down through the ages.
Yes this is what people forget when they bring up the generational "drift". If you are reproducing within your own people, then the older and even ancient parts of the genome are passed down. It is why a White parent who race mixes and produces a non-white child is actually more "related" to a random White person on the street, than to their own offspring.
There are various studies out there that suggest the "ideal" pairings are somewhere around the third or fourth cousin level. Which is basically what you would get in a traditionally sized community or small city.
There are various studies out there that suggest the "ideal" pairings are somewhere around the third or fourth cousin level. Which is basically what you would get in a traditionally sized community or small city.
You're confusing the point. You're still built from DNA of your ancestors, all the way back.
Toast message
How does anyone know what "Irish" DNA truly is? The baseline the DNA company uses could be based on 10 Germans who they thought were Irish.
The whole DNA test thing is a scam.