I refuse to buy any product of any single photo pictures a mixed race couple. And lately I’ve extended this logic to apply to virtually any photo of a black person period.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
29 comments:
15
1 month ago
15 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+15Score on mirror
)
4 children
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
7
1 month ago
7 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+7Score on mirror
)
Likewise. Since about 2010 when it became obvious.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
5
1 month ago
5 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+5Score on mirror
)
I report all ads with niggers in them as 'inappropriate'
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
1 month ago
2 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+2Score on mirror
)
Same
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
1 month ago
0 points
(+0
/
-0
)
I’m at the point now where I try to buy as little as possible, and when I do, I try to get something off the used market if possible. One thing I have going for me is that I have two very nice reliable vehicles both made before 2010 so I’ll likely never have to buy a new vehicle again. Most I might have to do is paint them. Other than that, tires, maintenance, and fuel. Thank God both have parts everywhere.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
If they could they would be spamming nigger porn instead of commercials.
Here living in jewtropolis and seeing all the marketing ads would lead you to believe that white people never existed. One clothing store stands out, it's called Bonobos, and every male model is black. I laugh.
The few times I've seen commercials lately, it appears as though we live in a black nation. The jew media is working overtime with what they have left...their golems
I mean, we kind of do now. Whites are the minority in the country now, and it shows.
These sorts of brands are ones that I think should be catering to the nigger audience in all fairness. What white man is going to pay 300 dollars for glasses when we can get near identical ones for a tenth of the price or even free with insurance?
As a kid I always associated those brands with *poverty* because it was always the undesirables I saw wearing them, so much so that I spent years thinking the Loui Viton logo was some sort of gang symbol.
As a kid I always associated those brands with *poverty* because it was always the undesirables I saw wearing them, so much so that I spent years thinking the Loui Viton logo was some sort of gang symbol.
I saw a video not too long ago, dude was interviewing these high school nogs and pointing out how they were all wearing apple watches, but everyone of them had dead batteries. He would ask them why it wasn't charge and got the same answer from each one "it's for accessory".
Which is extra niggish behavior when you take into account that they're designed to have an always on display, so not only were they walking around with an overpriced(and pretty ugly) watch without functionality, but everyone around *can see that it has no functionality*.
I'm not sure if that's better or worse than the blankfaced "watches" I saw being advertised about a decade ago.
I'm not sure if that's better or worse than the blankfaced "watches" I saw being advertised about a decade ago.
It's even worse because all the other stupid baboons would see it on their wrists and it go completely over their heads that the display wasn't on. That doesn't matter, they just one because it's trendy. I swear, these fucking monkeys are the most shallow, vapid people on the earth. They are so concerned with projecting that they have money....I mean, they'll die for it. It's fucking stupid.
> "My dawg would probably do it for a Louis belt / That's just all he know, he don't know nothin' else".
You're 100% correct. These "luxury" brands have been exposed, making their wears in China with "final assembly" (like adding a single button) done in Italy or France to have the associated "Made in ..." label. CNBC researched who was buying these brands most. It's mostly people who make under $100k/year, meaning the poor are keeping themselves poor trying to *look* rich rather than investing that $5,000 for a fucking handbag.
That's also another reason Kayne was being attacked by (((the industry))); he was telling black people to quit trying to look rich and actually get rich by investing. Obviously, we can't have that idea going around, now can we?
You're 100% correct. These "luxury" brands have been exposed, making their wears in China with "final assembly" (like adding a single button) done in Italy or France to have the associated "Made in ..." label. CNBC researched who was buying these brands most. It's mostly people who make under $100k/year, meaning the poor are keeping themselves poor trying to *look* rich rather than investing that $5,000 for a fucking handbag.
That's also another reason Kayne was being attacked by (((the industry))); he was telling black people to quit trying to look rich and actually get rich by investing. Obviously, we can't have that idea going around, now can we?
Anytime I’m at someone’s house and they have something on the kike box, I shit you not, everything is fat nigger faggot shit. I have an older female family member who loves watching game show stuff, and I shit you not it’s very rare to see anyone who’s not fat, a nigger, and/or a faggot on both the show, and the commercials. It really is something to behold now. I know it’s been like this in many ways for decades now, but the last 25 years have really been some special ass kind of acceleration.
Prole drift, niggers on the golf course. Prove me wrong
Toast message