You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
4
userman631 on scored.co
1 month ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
These sorts of brands are ones that I think should be catering to the nigger audience in all fairness. What white man is going to pay 300 dollars for glasses when we can get near identical ones for a tenth of the price or even free with insurance?
As a kid I always associated those brands with *poverty* because it was always the undesirables I saw wearing them, so much so that I spent years thinking the Loui Viton logo was some sort of gang symbol.
1 month ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)1 child
I saw a video not too long ago, dude was interviewing these high school nogs and pointing out how they were all wearing apple watches, but everyone of them had dead batteries. He would ask them why it wasn't charge and got the same answer from each one "it's for accessory".
1 month ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
Which is extra niggish behavior when you take into account that they're designed to have an always on display, so not only were they walking around with an overpriced(and pretty ugly) watch without functionality, but everyone around *can see that it has no functionality*.
I'm not sure if that's better or worse than the blankfaced "watches" I saw being advertised about a decade ago.
1 month ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
It's even worse because all the other stupid baboons would see it on their wrists and it go completely over their heads that the display wasn't on. That doesn't matter, they just one because it's trendy. I swear, these fucking monkeys are the most shallow, vapid people on the earth. They are so concerned with projecting that they have money....I mean, they'll die for it. It's fucking stupid.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
> "My dawg would probably do it for a Louis belt / That's just all he know, he don't know nothin' else".
You're 100% correct. These "luxury" brands have been exposed, making their wears in China with "final assembly" (like adding a single button) done in Italy or France to have the associated "Made in ..." label. CNBC researched who was buying these brands most. It's mostly people who make under $100k/year, meaning the poor are keeping themselves poor trying to *look* rich rather than investing that $5,000 for a fucking handbag.
That's also another reason Kayne was being attacked by (((the industry))); he was telling black people to quit trying to look rich and actually get rich by investing. Obviously, we can't have that idea going around, now can we?
And if they would only realize that none of it will make them white. A nigger in a nice suit will always be a nigger, just like a Christian nigger will still always be a nigger first.
As a kid I always associated those brands with *poverty* because it was always the undesirables I saw wearing them, so much so that I spent years thinking the Loui Viton logo was some sort of gang symbol.
I'm not sure if that's better or worse than the blankfaced "watches" I saw being advertised about a decade ago.
All you blacks want all the same things" ~ New Slaves by Kanye West
You're 100% correct. These "luxury" brands have been exposed, making their wears in China with "final assembly" (like adding a single button) done in Italy or France to have the associated "Made in ..." label. CNBC researched who was buying these brands most. It's mostly people who make under $100k/year, meaning the poor are keeping themselves poor trying to *look* rich rather than investing that $5,000 for a fucking handbag.
That's also another reason Kayne was being attacked by (((the industry))); he was telling black people to quit trying to look rich and actually get rich by investing. Obviously, we can't have that idea going around, now can we?