1 month ago21 points(+0/-0/+21Score on mirror)2 children
Britain fought on the side of Judeo-Bolshevism, and set events in motion that would cost them their entire empire.
But hey, at least the jews got what they wanted. Well done!
It's important to note that not everyone in Britain agreed with Churchill, and just like in America, many said "why attack Hitler? Why not make peace?"
1 month ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
My favorite thing about Mein Kampf was that Hitler recognized this fact and thought it should be taught over simply just memorizing dates and locations.
And they also claimed he hated jews for basically no reason. Im not joking, the best justification we got for Hitler's antisemitism was the Treaty of Versailles (which they repeatedly told us absolutely had nothing to do with the jews). Nothing of Weimar was ever mentioned, nothing of the revolution or the spartacist revolt that took germany out of WWI. The official American History narrative of Hitler is that he hated jews for no reason whatsoever since he was born and then somehow magically gained control of the german press and made everyone hate jews for no reason whatsoever as well. Unfortunately, I was too hopped up on autism drugs to question it at the time.
I'm not talking about speculation, but we CAN see how certain events in history were created as a direct result of actions and policies immediately preceding them. It's not hard to "read" history backwards and connect the dots.
For example, the Taliban were formed by some of the Afghan Mujahideen after the Soviet-Afghan War. The Soviet-Afghan War came about as a proxy battle of the Cold War, which was a continuation of the Vietnam and Korean Wars, etc., etc., etc.
That's not speculation, that's literally scholastic history.
If i flip the coin and it doesn't land on heads, then it will land on tails. Because there are only two possible outcomes we can say this. Technically the coin could lodge on its side but we can give **small** benefits of the doubt.
Invading countries during war is a complex problem with more than two outcomes. Blocking one eventuality does not necessitate the other. One should not give such a **large** benefit of the doubt.
It's not rocket surgery, it's basic critical thinking skills.
"If we didn't have pizza for dinner we would have had hot dogs" says the man who didn't take into account that there's also steak.
1 month ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
> *He has been published in The Occidental Observer, Human Events, National Review, The Nation, and Rolling Stone. The original host on CNN's Crossfire, he was a political commentator on the MSNBC cable network, including the show Morning Joe until February 2012, later appearing on Fox News.*
Idk. To me it looks like someone(s) probably paid good money to make sure this guy was only talking to people who weren't listening, nor interested in anything he was saying.
Also, Britain was 100% directly involved with the zionists, at the very least post-war, in promoting the six million hoax and then handing over Palestine, previously a Britain-controlled territory, to the jews and recognizing it as a new sovereign country (israel).
Muslim and Christian Palestinians were still 90% of the citizens in 1947 before Nakba (arabic for catastrophe basically), down to only 20% by 1950 after ethnic cleansing by the zionists with the direct help of the Brits.
Britain is easily even more responsible for modern day israel than it is for the CCP, NK, Vietnam, etc.
Which means its own undoing is also 100% its own fault.
Pat Buchanen did have some influence of the prepper race war separatists like The Covenant, the Sword, and the Arm of the Lord, and others like the Weavers but the big boot of the government came down on these people.
Pat was and remains very based. He was talking about many of the things we are still contending with.... 40-50 fuckin years ago. Really the only "mainstream" voice to do that, though the kike media still tried to portray him as fringe.
While not perfect, his work has only helped us in the long game.
Proof that the Liberalism of the British (and later, American) Empire and the Communism of the Bolshevik are joined at the hip. Liberalism is the pupeteer of communism, and Kabalist jews and their masonic minions are the puppeteers of Liberalism.
But hey, at least the jews got what they wanted. Well done!