New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
10
Anyone have any clue what they really used to kill Charlie Kirk?
posted 1 month ago by RussianWarCriminal on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror )
20 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
Its obvious that .30-06 would have blown a big hole through his neck but there wasn't even an exit wound on the back of his neck according to Candace Owens who saw the video from behind.

Some say it was a flechette or .22lr round from close range.

What seems exceedingly strange to me is that there were dozens of cameras filming the event and not a single one captured a projectile flying through the air.

Something here seems fake and gay. Either the whole thing was staged or they used some advanced direct energy weapon to punch a hole through his neck. Since there is literally no reason to employ advanced Intel agency tech to assassinate this guy, I'm starting to think that this whole thing was faked and Kirk is still alive.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
wankingisgay on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Im no expert but i expect the distance to the target would count
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
marvinthehaggler on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Sure. But with standard (supersonic) .30-06, assuming that were the round used, anything inside 600m it's going to hit like a piledriver. From the rifle I saw in the picture (and assuming that was actually the rifle used), that round would be traveling at ~3000 fps. ~3000 fps x 110 grain bullet = WHAM. Even moreso, if it were a standard-for-caliber 150 grain, or 168 grain.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message