New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I realize even asking this topic is controversial enough but I don't get it. The more I've experienced Christianity in life, the less I respect it. I read the Old and New Testament from front-to-back and had far more respect for the Old Testament than the new but still found either book overly convoluted, boring and hardly useful or with solid purpose. Outside of the Bible itself, it's the people who call themselves Christians I cannot stand.

I have never met a Christian I have liked in life. Most are judgmental about the least important things and then forgiving about the most important of things.

What I mean by that is you might watch porn then some Christian will think you're a monster, lecture you on how porn is draining your mana and it's bad juju with as much mysticism in their rationale as a native shaman. And then someone will assassinate Charlie Kirk and they'll "forgive them". What the fuck is this bullshit?

Christian organizations are responsible for bringing immigrants. Christian organization are responsible for weak values that our enemies exploit. Christian organization do business with our enemies and take their money and promote their values.

Why do right-wingers cling onto the Christian religion when maybe 10,000 people worldwide practice a decent form of Christianity and all the rest are practicing some bastardized version?

When 999m of the billion followers are practicing "false Christianity" when does one accept that perhaps it's the 1m who are in fact false?

I have never met a good Christian, ever. I have met good people who were theist but not Christian or atheist but never Christian. I've seen all these "based Christians" online but I fear they must live in the countryside, never learning their homestead because I've live in nearly a dozen different cities and I've never met them out and about in the city among the average person.
You must log in or sign up to comment
23 comments:
11
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 month ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror )
Because Christianity is antisemitic. Fuck off, you goddamned retarded pile of shit. I’m not even going to read the text of your comment because you know zero about the topics we discuss on this board.
Megaboom2025 on scored.co
1 month ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror )
The enemy is lucifer.

Only Christ has defeated Lucifer. Hitler came close.

We pray for their returns every day.
multiformat on scored.co
1 month ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 2 children
The vast majority of whites are Christians. Deal with it. You can huff your farts and philosophize about what belief system is better, you're free to believe whatever you want, but if you wish for a wedge to be driven between Christian whites and non-Christian whites, then the pro-white movement will be DOA.
CaptainTrouble on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
I've seen far more Christians try to force this wedge (look at this topic for example) than the non-Christians. Christians can't take criticism and resort to attacks. They consider all non-Christians as inferior, or evil, or demons, etc... they would wedge a divide with antisemitic White men simply because those men aren't Christian, would they not?
LonelyPepe on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Obviously you've not been around much in similar online spaces or even read some of the interactions here because on the contrary to your idiotic spiel I've seen more non-Christians trying to drive a wedge when we should be uniting against our common enemy - jews.
-1
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 month ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror )
> I've seen more non-Christians trying to drive a wedge when we should be uniting against our common enemy - jews.

Because Christians are allies of all the *other* enemies of White Supremacy, which are niggers and shitskins and bug people.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Pro-white movement is DOA until it shakes off the association with Christianity.

We need to win over young White men. Do you think young White men, especially the ones with high testosterone, would follow a movement that promises no sex before marriage and no porn?

Why don't you Christians stop it with your bizarre obsession of trying to force faggots to put their penises in vaginas, and start promoting racial nationalism?

Then we'll talk.
TallestSkil on scored.co
27 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
>Pro-white movement is DOA until it shakes off the association with Christianity.

Whites didn’t conquer the world until they were Christian. You have zero defense for your judaism.
steele2 on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
>What I mean by that is you might watch porn then some Christian will think you're a monster

Watching porn is wrong.

You seen displeased about being held to high standards.

>Christian organizations are responsible for bringing immigrants.

Our mainstream media, social media, academia, health care, banking institutions and government have been thoroughly subverted by the jew.

What makes you think the Christ-killers haven't subverted most of the Christian churches too?

>When 999m of the billion followers are practicing "false Christianity"

Please substantiate your claim that you intimately know a billion Christians.

>I have never met a good Christian, ever.

You know this how?

Zrupsloohg on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
There comes a point where one must accept that a large majority of people on the "right wing" desperately cling on to Christianity because they can't conceive of any other meaningful or philosophical alternative. They read of triumphs of their ancestors and they attribute it to their Christianity instead of their European greatness.

They'll come up with great mental gymnastics in their pursuit of their idealized version of Christianity. These could range from [trying to argue that the "original" 2nd temple Judeans were White](https://web.archive.org/web/20250922223143if_/https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GzdWKF9WYAEHhwU.jpg), to arguing that only Whites practice Christianity the "proper way".

There are others who argue that anything explicitly pro-White is impalpable to the masses so they compromise by arguing in favor of "Christian nationalism" instead, [which is stupid and Kalergian in nature](https://www.gordonconwell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Picture1-7.png). The worst of the Christians refuse to take any action at all, because "Jesus wins in the end", discounting that most interpretations of Christian apocalypticism require Christians to greatly lose or suffer.

I will admit there are benefits to Christianity. The fear of hell or damnation has produced beneficial societal actions, but sin is usually defined arbitrarily and most Christians will struggle to define what is or isn't a sin and why. I'm not opposed to those who NEED Christianity, but there absolutely isn't any way that it's essential for Our survival. Jews will hate you regardless of your Christianity [because they see all Whites as representative of their mythical enemy, "Edom"](https://web.archive.org/web/20250923075405if_/https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1937422507599880192/vid/avc1/852x480/LhIKx59CXsNxOjff.mp4).
ReallyAnnoyed on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
You’re wrong about porn; porn is evil, and just another Jewish demoralization tool AS IS Christianity. Christianity is a Jewish narrative! Why does anyone have to sacrifice anyone or anything to get sins ‘redeemed’? It’s a quintessentially Jewish notion!

When I saw those chicken-swingers torturing and killing an innocent animal in order to transfer their sins to it, and get God to absolve them of sin, I said to myself, “hey! Jesus is a stand-in for the chicken, and how does any of this make any frickin’ sense?”

Europeans were given this lemon and, culturally speaking, made some delicious lemonade, but I think we need to regain our old Greco-Roman and Nordic moral bases which emphasized strength, honor, truth beauty, and not craven submission. Watching Christians kiss the feet of Africans makes my skin crawl.
LiberalAtheistBrony on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
Probably not a terrible idea to give each other some shit for bad habits. i have my share, and pious people are more apt to purity spiral, getting preoccupied demanding each other live perfect lives free of our own failures, but that's very different from attacking a fellow for not living up to the potential you know he possesses. It's not wrong to let someone you love know that he's being weak.

The church is also one of the few entities on earth that makes a sincere attempt to address human error. I also probably can't call myself a Christian because I don't fully agree with everything the Church says about right and wrong (i've always found their explanation for man's fall a bit unsatisfactory, and then there's the perennial evolution quagmire, as naive examples) which presumably means I don't fully agree with Christ's teachings and cannot be his follower. But there is definitely such a thing as sin. I can't imagine living through life and not coming to understand that on some level. It's everywhere and it's abundant and it's gross and it's deadly. And Christianity, for all its faults, has done a pretty good job of addressing that. Even if Christian tradition is partially wrong about some specifics of what sin is, the literal practice of Christianity has helped bring people together and has helped people address a very real problem in human existence, which government doesn't address, corporations don't address, politics doesn't address, media barely addresses, etc. So it offers people something they can't get elsewhere. I think that says something.

Of course, I don't know Christian doctrine that thoroughly and I'm just trying to give my opinion from an outsider's perspective. Jesus can be ironically kind of hard to learn about if you're not in the church. I still find out things I was taught about him as kid were wrong.

i don't know why you've never met a good Christian unless this whole post is just a troll; that seems silly.

On the offchance you're not, I do feel like there is a certain veneration of meekness associated with [at least modern] Christianity, or at least a kind moral resignation that probably isn't healthy. When I see Nigerian bishops it feels a bit like watching the UN, or an Indian leading a mass at an old white church, i wonder a little about what forces are truly in charge. I suppose these patterns come from believing you can't actually save yourself alone, but I'm not sure that's it. I think it's more like: Christianity is fundamentally an internationalist religion; Jesus tells his disciples to convert all nations, and that universalism shows. It's probably the one truly fundamental problem I can see with the religious structure. I'm not sure it's possible to have a moral system that is both internally consistent and universal.
ReallyAnnoyed on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I agree with a lot of your comment, particularly the latter part. Different groups have different ‘bio-spirits’, and One Religion is never going to fit all.

I know virtually nothing about Confucianism, but it seems to have held up in China. I don’t think the Chinese are universalists, which is commendable.
deleted 1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Because actual Christianity was created to warn people about the Synagogue of Satan, so (((they))) methodically replaced it with a clever forgery over the past 500 years in order to defang their greatest threat. They have promulgated false biblical translations based on the (((masoretic))) text, re-defined words in order to confuse Christians about how Justice is supposed to be done, and outright flooded seminaries with subversive homosexuals who openly spit on doctrine. Christianity is the only hope we have for a world free of the so-called jews and the Antichrist they bring with them, which is why they have made sure that no one understands what it actually is. If you want to know what Christianity actually is, read about the lives of the Crusaders and the teachings of the Church Fathers, read the Vulgate or a good translation of it. And understand what (((they))) have stolen from you.
BeefyBelisarius on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Because our ancestors conquered the world with a sword in one hand and a cross in the other.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
If our ancestors were conquering the world motivated by their Christian faith, why is it that they didn't conquer, or even attempt to conquer, the Holy Land?

The Holy Land has been in the hands of the spiritual enemies of the Christians (Jews and Muslims) for 600 years.

Pick one:

1) White people were not powerful enough to retake the Holy Land.

2) Nobody gave a shit about the cross.
BeefyBelisarius on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Mainly because disunity is our greatest weakness. We took it and ruled several crusader kingdoms for a time, but couldn't come to an agreement to mobilize the troops needed to make it permanent. And we took it again after the breakup of the Ottoman Empire.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
> couldn't come to an agreement to mobilize the troops needed to make it permanent

This means that Christianity has always played a minor role in European's foreign policy, and it wasn't an important factor like you said earlier.

> we took it again after the breakup of the Ottoman Empire

Yes and the Christian Zionists immediately gave it to the Jews.
BeefyBelisarius on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Britcucks only gave it up after an extensive terrorism campaign by the kikes.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
No, they promised to give it to them before they even had it.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
>why is it that they didn't conquer, or even attempt to conquer, the Holy Land?

They literally did, but got lazy and started infighting, and so they lost it. Ironically, losing it to the Muslims might have been for the best in the long run though, as they have managed to prevent the jews from establishing Antichrist up until the British empire decided to betray Christendom (as they had already abandoned it to worship money) and give it to the jews.
Toast message