Consume Product

> that Charlie Kirk had been assassinated by agents of the Israeli state.

Yes, and there is plenty of evidence pointing towards that. At this point I require counter-evidence to be proven otherwise, which doesn't come from jews because I do not trust them.

> Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu himself issued a formal denial

Completely worthless. But it raised suspicion even more.

> I take a different view

Good for you. My conviction is not based on wishful thinking nor ideology. Someone already asked me if I am left-wing or right-wing to assert that Netanyahu ordered the assassination. People do not seem to function well if they cannot throw labels at you to discredit you without merit.

> we must first establish just how deeply entangled Kirk was with the Zionist project

We know that he was a zionist shabbos goy of the highest order. That is why him starting to ask questions and criticize israel was that more threatening to them. So he had to be stopped. And how better could he be stopped than being killed as a devoted jew-loving cuck, before he and his followers could slowly turn against israel? He was their asset, and they popped it when it was most convenient for them. In some sense it was treason to the jews - or rather the beginning of it.

Imagine the horrors it would cause if a devoted zionist would turn against his masters. It would have WAY more impact than someone talking about kikes who was never in bed with them before, just criticizing them from the outside.

> Kirk’s statement was clear: “Jews have been some of the largest funders of cultural Marxist ideas and supporters of those ideas over the last 30 or 40 years. Stop supporting causes that hate you.”

He wasn't allowed to talk negatively about jews in any shape or form. This alone already reveals too much about them. But sure, you could make the argument that it was just the beginning and does not warrant an assassination.

But you see, if that continues and you wait 6 months, wouldn't it raise even more suspicion if they'd assassinate him? They made a big investment into him, they didn't want it to go to waste.

> The temptation in moments like this is to leap into the loudest conspiracy.

I don't give a fuck what really happened. If many people believe that the jews killed him (which I find most likely), and it turns them against them, great. My ultimate goal is TKD.

And you know what? As long as they won't disprove it, great. It can continue to exist as another instance of jewish terrorism. The shabbos goys should fear their masters - even if it merely sews dissonance between them.

People do not want to hear the truth anyway. If they knew, they'd want TKD as well, or at least support, tolerate, understand it. So what, they do not believe the assassination was made by jews, but the holocaust is totally heckin' real? We are dealing with misinformed, brainwashed, ideologically possessed people. Let's help them go towards truth - perhaps it starts the path of noticing for them. Even if it turns out false, at least they acquired significant truths.

"ignore your eyes and ears that clearly showed Kirk was turning against them" No thanks.

Another user wrote this;

Good article on why the Mossad killed Kirk theory doesn't make a great deal of sense. And finishes with a very important point - we must not ruin our credibility as critics of Jewish power by passing off speculative conspiracy theories as fact.

The Jews are guilty of far worse and provable crimes, it's not worth sacrificing our credibility on this altar. Just gives credence to the people who dismiss criticism of Jewish power as baseless conspiracy theories motivated by resentment or scapegoating or whatever.

Also it just distracts us and makes us infight when we should be uniting behind crushing leftist extremism.