As much as I don't want to believe it, the evidence seems fairly incontrovertible at this point that there was indeed a troon-orchestrated plot to assassinate Kirk in the days prior to the event occurring via Discord or a similar private chat platform, likely in affiliation with the "764" predator group. News of this will almost certainly break within a matter of days once the common link between those troons is discovered and blown wide open.
I therefore believe that Tyler Robinson **did** indeed go to the event with the intention of killing Kirk.
However, do I believe Robinson pulled the trigger?
**Fuck no.**
If you've seen the alleged weapon and bullets, there's no way a limpwristed faggot geek like Robinson could ever have pulled off a shot like that with the equipment he had assembled. Not in a million years. Not without giving himself one hell of a black eye and the structurally weakened bullets shattering on impact.
I subsequently believe there were in fact **two** gunmen; Robinson and an operative, almost certainly Israeli. Neither were aware of the other, but upon likely seeing Kirk get shot, Tyler decided he wanted to be the "hero" for his faggot boyfriend Lance.
Here is what I think happened:
>Multiple troons plot Kirk's assassination on discord, oblivious to any other parallel plans
>At the same time, Israeli government commence their own plot, likely owing to the wide plethora of vantage points available
>Both arrive, unaware of the other's presence
>Mossad takes shot from 200 feet away and skedaddles
>Old guy was a Mossad plant who was either ready to take the fall or instructed to allow their guy to exfil, perhaps both in order to slow law enforcement down
>Real assassin was onboard Derek Maxfield's N888KG in minutes in return for a hefty kickback, in order to cover enough distance from the site of the shooting to put the culprit firmly outside of canvassing range
>Plane dipped below the radar to allow the assassin to parachute out in case the plane was stopped later on, or to jettison the evidence so it could be collected and disposed of
>He was then promptly collected and on a flight back to Israel within the hour
>Robinson, deciding he wants to be a hero for the troon cause, takes responsibility for the killing he did not actually commit
This is what I think is the truest version of events.
If a non-Leftist like Kirk isn't killed, a 'hatemonger' is still 'spewing hate'. So it is good that he was killed.
Why every spree shooter, etc. must be White rather than non-white is also fairly easy to understand. Posted here before, I seem to recall, were graphs that demonstrate that, at least in America, White Leftists are the only group with racial out-group preference while all non-White Leftists have racial in-group preference. (Rightists of all races, including White, also have racial in-group preference.) White Leftists want to be collectively be blamed racially for things, since such blame justifies their racial out-group preference and ethnomasochism; non-White Leftists, by contrast, always want an outsider to blame, since that justifies their racial in-group preference. Match made in Heaven.
What is curious is the last part, why many Leftists, irrespective of race, are so insistent that the killer is *not* one of them, but a non-Leftist: if a non-Leftist like Kirk is killed, but by a Leftist, why does the Left have trouble taking ownership of the fact that the killer is one of theirs? Hence the ridiculous idea that a man with a tranny 'girlfriend', who writes 'Hey catch, fascists' on one of his bullets, and, according to his family, called Kirk full of 'hate', is somehow closer to Fuentes than to Antifa. It seems to me pretty obvious that, if his internet history is more fully uncovered, it will reveal someone deeply immersed in Far-Left politics (e.g. communist subreddits) and meme 'culture' (e.g. subreddits like r/PoliticalCompassMemes, hence the silly inscriptions like 'LMAO' on his weapons and ammunition). I don't believe that his radicalization began in higher education or began with other non-internet sources.