Consume Product

Technically? Yes, he could be forgiven by Jesus if he were to make the proper penance.

The chance of that happening? About the same as a nigger taking responsibility for his children.

> pray for charlie's killer and haters Bless them

Holy shit, eat an entire log of the smelliest indian shit. Worthless faggots. smh

I'm making an account on AR15 to PM this faggot a bunch of slurs.

Gun nut forums like that one are full of libertarians, Zionists, race-mixing White men with brown descendants, and assorted trash who waffle unceasingly about 'Islamo-Communazism' (i.e. anything non-libertarian), how their grandfathers were the real anti-fascists when they stormed Normandy Beach, how MLK would be a Republican if he were here today, about a 'civil war' between Red and Blue states that isn't coming, and a whole lot of other nonsense. Where one finds such people one also finds some 'Judeo-Christian' Evangelicals who interweave a rotten religious understanding with these other beliefs. These useless eaters will be uttering 'Semper Fi' and 'Molon Labe' - not realizing that the ancient Greeks and Romans would utterly despize them if they were here today - while riding around on their golf carts until they finally kick the bucket from cholesterol or diabetes.

A Brazilian drug cartel, the 'Pure Third Command' (TCP), shares these very same 'Judeo-Christian', Evangelical religious views, claiming, for instance, that the State of Israel needs to exist because it will help bring about the Second Coming of Jesus. You know that these religious views are wrong when brown Brazilians share them as they literally stamp the Star of David on their drug packages. Deception is only a moral flaw unbefitting of the omnibenevolent when it happens to the undeserving: God would deceive scum like this away from Truth precisely because they, unlike the undeserving, clearly deserve to be deceived. Put simply, there is no possibility that a drug cartel has correct religious views: God ensures that evil people are mired in the falsehoods that they deserve to be mired in. Put simpler still, evil people simply never have correct religious views.

> seen God supernaturally protect

The only thing that this brings to mind is the whole failed attempt, ostensibly by Crooks, to assassinate candidate Trump admittedly being easily interpretable, especially by those theistically-inclined, as miraculous. Other than that, I have never seen any reason to believe in miracles of that nature. We can do anything that we like in this life within the God-given constraints of Nature. We are only rewarded or punished at some posthumous, other-worldly 'time' ('time', because spatiotemporality may not exist or exist very differently in other-worldly contexts), e.g. at a 'time' of judgement. (If there is no such thing, then nihilism ends up being correct: there is either a God who decides what is moral or immoral *or* there is no such thing as anything moral or immoral outside of false social constructions shaped purely by power and preference. Naturalism is a possible third position that some philosophers argue for, but I presently only find Theism and Atheism-Nihilism to be plausible. Although I am not familiar with Dostoevsky, my father brought it to my attention recently that Dostoevsky's reasoning was similar to mine on this issue, a sort of Divine Command Theorism, thus the famous Dostoevsky quote 'If God doesn't exist, all is permitted'. I indeed consider nihilism to be the only reasonable logical conclusion of atheism, hence why I equate atheism and nihilism.)

Next, there is no reason to believe that God cares who governs man - there is no Divine Right, *tianming* (Heavenly Mandate), or any other similar thing, or, if there ever was, we have strayed so far away from it that finding our way back to it is practically impossible, for it is not as though the right man is simply waiting in the wings for us to appoint him our ruler - hence man's being ruled today by very flawed persons. For what will happen if America elects some tranny as president? How could we attribute the election of such an abomination to God? We cannot. He permits the wicked to rule over the wicked, but He certainly does not appoint them, handpick them.

Likewise, there is no reason to believe that God cares who lives or who dies, because, as earlier said, God's rewards and punishments are chiefly or entirely other-worldly and not this-worldly. *Karma* - the idea of something such as God actively rewarding and punishing in this world - is a non-Abrahamic religious concept. But God is not wholly deistic, either. Prayer may indeed have power, but God is not obligated to answer prayers. Instead, He answers those He chooses to answer and ignores those He chooses to ignore. And, as earlier said, He leads the deserving to Truth and the undeserving to falsehood: if certain religious views are held by a literal drug cartel, that is a sign to those who are good that these views are overwhelmingly composed of falsehoods.

In short, God was indifferent to this worldly event. This does not mean that God is incapable of appointing rulers or intervening in world events if He so chooses. He simply chooses not to for reasons of His own. Thus, He *could* have saved Charlie Kirk, but since God knows men better than men know men, He made His decision based on all kinds of things that we - and even Charlie Kirk himself - do not know. Further, if Kirk was wrongly killed, it is clear that God permits bad things to happen in this world: bad events can be tests; they can be punishments. For if God did not allow imperfections and bad things to happen in this world, there would be no point in its creation, for He would essentially be creating a second, extra Heaven, something seemingly redundant. This world was instead made to be (relatively) balanced, not to be paradisiacal nor completely hellish.

> Charlie is with Jesus now

If Kirk is somehow moral in the eyes of God, he will be when the 'time' is right. You do not know that it is 'now' because only God knows the 'time'. Any interpretation that pathological quasi-Christians come up with, such as that he was killed so that he could be with God sooner, is preposterous. Why would God use some Antifa tranny to send Charlie Kirk to Him? Fools who allege such things only show their finitude of intellect and tempt God's Wrath.

The fool then proceeds to go way off down the usual pathological quasi-Christian path of 'loving' and 'forgiving' everyone like some dumb hippie from the 1960s.

> Will the assassin go to Hell?

If it is true that a gun and bullets were found with tranny and Antifa nonsense on them, then it is true that the assassin belongs in Hell. It does not matter whether he comes to believe in Jesus or whether Jesus or Charlie Kirk forgives him or any other such thing. If he really is in with Antifa and trannies - Transtifa - and they aren't simply being framed, then this is a person who wishes to harm those who are morally superior to him, healthier than him: those who do not suffer from the same degenerate afflictions that he does, afflictions which increase to oneself the appeal of Left-Wing values, the values of the weak. Luckily, since everything appears to be Far-Right when you are sufficiently Left-Wing, he chose to off someone whose worldview is not that far removed from his own, rather than an actual 'Nazi'. It occurred to me yesterday that Charlie Kirk would have closer ideological alignment with his assassin than he would with me; for instance, on 'anti-Semitism', individualism, race, and 'transsexuals'. That is one of the only reasons for which I condemn Kirk's assassination and hope that the killer is put to death: that is someone who wants to kill people like those who frequent this forum. Because of his own Left biases, he simply misjudged the relatively centrist Charlie Kirk as one of us and acted accordingly.

I don't even want to respond to the rest of this nonsense, because it reads as too irrational and pathological to warrant consideration. I do not know where this hippie Jesus comes from. I have not found evidence of him in my own reading. If this hippie Jesus ever existed, he was an evil being who has led countless people into wrongdoing over the past two millennia.

For instance, these beliefs had the parents of Amy Biehl shake hands with the South African murderers of their daughter simply because they believed that it is what hippie Jesus would have wanted. They even said that the murderers remind them in some way of their deceased daughter. And then they went on to help the murderers and their families financially and so forth.

Is the tale of the Wandering Jew simply false? For hippie Jesus would never condemn a yid to that fate. He would only be able to merely forgive the yid no matter what he said or did. Otherwise, he would be guilty of inconsistency. However, jihadi Jesus, he who came to bring not peace but a sword, who insisted that his followers arm themselves, and who told violent parables, all unbefitting of a peacenik, is someone who could punish a yid in such a severe manner without being guilty of inconsistency. This contemporarily prevalent notion of a hippie, peacenik, pacifist Jesus is most likely just another religious falsehood, one found in the minds of many who deserve to be deceived.