6 days ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)2 children
Putting communist and anarchist on opposite ends is the reason why most "political scientists" are retards. Anarchy has always been a thinly veiled attempt at instituting violent Regime Change, Communism is simply the ideological form of Anarchy being used for Regime Change.
The political spectrum is wrong but this is even worse jewish nonsense. Here's what I believe about the real political spectrum
The socioeconomic axis can be categorized into Reactionary, revolutionary, and conservative.
Reactionaries want to go back in time to pre industrial society, revolutionaries want to change things for better or worse by implementing a new system, conservatives want to keep things the same (conserve)
And on the economic spectrum the same thing.
Revolutionary economic systems ranging from communism to syndicalism to socialism to corporatism
Reactionary economic systems like feudalism, distributism (that one blurs the line between revolutionary and reactionary), and mercantilism.
And conservative economic systems, liberalism, mixed markets, laissez Faire.
You also have your social values, which are again organized well under the same 3 labels
Now you also have your axis of authority.
Authoritarianism, autocracy, and totalitarianism on the "statist" end of the spectrum. Yes, each one of these is a different thing.
Parliamentarianism, federalism, and republicanism in the center.
Regime Change can change any regime to anything, Communism is just one possible outcome.
Think about what your words mean before you say them, or you end up calling Communism inevitable.