New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
84
posted 16 days ago by RJ567 on scored.co (+1 / -0 / +83Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
15 days ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
The downside is that governments are retarded. If there were a way to guarantee that muderers, rapists, and mud sharks all got the rope, without either false positives *or* shifting the goal posts to enable executions for "hate" crimes, I'd be all for it.

That said, less than 1% of the population ever sees the defendant side of a court room. If those people were just gone...
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
15 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
sure, if you could guarantee it would never be able to be abused, and 100% of people subject to it were overwhelmingly guilty by a standard even higher than "reasonable doubt"... then sure. and at that rate, i'd say fuck appeals, just hold the execution immediately after conviction.

but we can't guarantee that. look at all the bullshit political persecutions of orange man.
-1
NayGigga on scored.co
15 days ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Your orange man is a treasonous devil-worshipping pedophilic bastard. You're in the wrong place if that's the best example you could think of.
removed 15 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Toast message