You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-3
SillyRascal1660 on scored.co
25 days ago-3 points(+0/-0/-3Score on mirror)1 child
>I'm on your case because you've been making obscene comments for a while now,
What is this, plebbit? Am I not allowed to have a little bit of my fun?
>and recently you've been making comments and arguments that are identical to the pedojeet.
I made fun of agecucks ONCE. So? I make fun of all groups, pedophiles and agecucks included. The only side I am truly on is my own.
>Are you suggesting that we should tolerate the pedojeet, or tolerate pedophilia, or even a hint of it?
No, no, and no. I am not pro pedophile, however, I do believe the word "pedophile" is quickly becoming meaningless due to over usage, to the point where that word has lost a lot of its weight to me.
>Our tolerance of evil has enabled its proliferation and normalization.
I agree, however, that way of defeating evil(by not tolerating it) fails when you remember that most people, even most good people, are not willing to go out and destroy all evil, root and stem.
Because of that, the only way to defeat an evil group is with an even stonger, even eviler group.
You need to be evil to fight evil.
It is a shame that the goody 2 shoes natsocs did not understand that fact.
Being an honerable knight in a world of venomous serpents in the shadows, vile serpents such as myself, is a good way to get tricked at best(most goyim), and stabbed in the back at worst(natsocs of germany).
> What is this, plebbit? Am I not allowed to have a little bit of my fun?
No, this is ConPro, where we understand the need to protect our borders, control who enters, and police our own community. We're not midwit libertarians, as we understand the inherent failings of that philosophy, mindset, and governance.
> I made fun of agecucks ONCE. So? I make fun of all groups, pedophiles and agecucks included. The only side I am truly on is my own.
It wasn't just once. You've made several comments advocating for sex with minors. A simple peruse of your comment history proves as much.
> No, no, and no. I am not pro pedophile, however, I do believe the word "pedophile" is quickly becoming meaningless due to over usage, to the point where that word has lost a lot of its weight to me.
In a non corrupted world, I would agree with you. I'd even go as far as thinking marriages with "younger" women would be fine, so long as marriage was a sacred institution...but it's not, in either case. Normalization of pedophilia has become common, and just as any other evil becomes normalized, regular people have to put their foot down and declare "no more", to put a stop to it, and de-normalize it, even if the grey areas used to be tolerated under specific circumstances. This is normal under any backlash scenario that plays out in times like these, where the evil must be stopped.
> I agree, however, that way of defeating evil(by not tolerating it) fails when you remember that most people, even most good people, are not willing to go out and destroy all evil, root and stem.
This is only because people are still too comfortable. That is the only inhibitor of current action, which is fading rapidly as inflation steals people's ability to pay their bills and eat. We're on the cusp of that necessary action. In any case, just because people aren't actively rooting out evil (in real life) doesn't mean that tolerating it, in word and idea, should be tolerated online. That's a logically fallacious position to take, hiding behind the current apathy and inaction of people to make a blanket statement on whether something is or is not good, or whether it should or should not be tolerated.
> Because of that, the only way to defeat an evil group is with an even stonger, even eviler group...You need to be evil to fight evil.
Evil and sin are inherently tied to falsehood and lies. To be evil is to reject truth, and to be good is to be in accordance with truth, in thought, word, action, and behavior. You can't defeat evil with more evil. It's like saying you can defeat lies with more lies, or that you can defeat pedophilia by advocating for rape of even younger babies, or by arguing that theft can be stopped by normalizing even worse theft. That's why "evil begets evil" is a truism. Only good can defeat evil. Only truth can defeat lies. Only beauty can defeat ugliness.
Your mistake is thinking that violence is inherently evil, that all violence is necessarily wrong, which is false. On matters of neutral ideas (like violence), the circumstances of the thing defines whether it is good or evil. Righteous people enacting righteous violence to stop evil is good. Evil people enacting evil violence to hurt good is an evil.
> t is a shame that the goody 2 shoes natsocs did not understand that fact.
I'm well passed the naivety of my childhood and the propaganda I was fed.
> Being an honerable knight in a world of venomous serpents in the shadows, vile serpents such as myself, is a good way to get tricked at best(most goyim), and stabbed in the back at worst(natsocs of germany).
This statement would hold weight if you truly understood what "honorable" meant, or what "good" meant, or what "evil" meant, or your inherent argument about advocacy of more evil to "combat" pedophilia, considering your previous statements.
To forgive your family, friends, neighbors, brethren, and people is one of the highest callings and noblest of things. Without forgiveness none of us can be saved, as it's core to the Christian faith.
> no one actually ever forgives anyone, at least not in my experience.
Jesus forgives us. Good people forgive. You hang out with bad people if they don't forgive.
Forgiveness is a necessary foundation of healthy groups, regardless of size or context. This doesn't mean crimes go unpunished, though. Forgiveness is a necessary means to engender healthy relationships, because we all err and make mistakes. Judeo-Christians use "forgiveness" to push self destructive altruism, where good people are taken advantage of over and over and over. That's not forgiveness and that's not righteous, and it's not what God has ever asked of us.
1. No one should apologize for anything they meant to do. That comes across as disingenuous, and thus jewish.
2. People only apologize because someone is mad at them and is being annoying, loud or trying to punish them. The whole point of an apology, the only reason they exist, is to get the offended, autistic nigger to stop freaking out and calm the fuck down.
Apologizes rarely function for their one and only intended purpose: being a get out of jail free card.
Ergo, fuck being "sorry".
When i am the dragon emperor of earth, anyone who tries to be a retard with me by freaking out at me and demanding an apolgy from me, I will probably consume him as my favorite breakfast, coontucky fried human.
What is this, plebbit? Am I not allowed to have a little bit of my fun?
>and recently you've been making comments and arguments that are identical to the pedojeet.
I made fun of agecucks ONCE. So? I make fun of all groups, pedophiles and agecucks included. The only side I am truly on is my own.
>Are you suggesting that we should tolerate the pedojeet, or tolerate pedophilia, or even a hint of it?
No, no, and no. I am not pro pedophile, however, I do believe the word "pedophile" is quickly becoming meaningless due to over usage, to the point where that word has lost a lot of its weight to me.
>Our tolerance of evil has enabled its proliferation and normalization.
I agree, however, that way of defeating evil(by not tolerating it) fails when you remember that most people, even most good people, are not willing to go out and destroy all evil, root and stem.
Because of that, the only way to defeat an evil group is with an even stonger, even eviler group.
You need to be evil to fight evil.
It is a shame that the goody 2 shoes natsocs did not understand that fact.
Being an honerable knight in a world of venomous serpents in the shadows, vile serpents such as myself, is a good way to get tricked at best(most goyim), and stabbed in the back at worst(natsocs of germany).
No, this is ConPro, where we understand the need to protect our borders, control who enters, and police our own community. We're not midwit libertarians, as we understand the inherent failings of that philosophy, mindset, and governance.
> I made fun of agecucks ONCE. So? I make fun of all groups, pedophiles and agecucks included. The only side I am truly on is my own.
It wasn't just once. You've made several comments advocating for sex with minors. A simple peruse of your comment history proves as much.
> No, no, and no. I am not pro pedophile, however, I do believe the word "pedophile" is quickly becoming meaningless due to over usage, to the point where that word has lost a lot of its weight to me.
In a non corrupted world, I would agree with you. I'd even go as far as thinking marriages with "younger" women would be fine, so long as marriage was a sacred institution...but it's not, in either case. Normalization of pedophilia has become common, and just as any other evil becomes normalized, regular people have to put their foot down and declare "no more", to put a stop to it, and de-normalize it, even if the grey areas used to be tolerated under specific circumstances. This is normal under any backlash scenario that plays out in times like these, where the evil must be stopped.
> I agree, however, that way of defeating evil(by not tolerating it) fails when you remember that most people, even most good people, are not willing to go out and destroy all evil, root and stem.
This is only because people are still too comfortable. That is the only inhibitor of current action, which is fading rapidly as inflation steals people's ability to pay their bills and eat. We're on the cusp of that necessary action. In any case, just because people aren't actively rooting out evil (in real life) doesn't mean that tolerating it, in word and idea, should be tolerated online. That's a logically fallacious position to take, hiding behind the current apathy and inaction of people to make a blanket statement on whether something is or is not good, or whether it should or should not be tolerated.
> Because of that, the only way to defeat an evil group is with an even stonger, even eviler group...You need to be evil to fight evil.
Evil and sin are inherently tied to falsehood and lies. To be evil is to reject truth, and to be good is to be in accordance with truth, in thought, word, action, and behavior. You can't defeat evil with more evil. It's like saying you can defeat lies with more lies, or that you can defeat pedophilia by advocating for rape of even younger babies, or by arguing that theft can be stopped by normalizing even worse theft. That's why "evil begets evil" is a truism. Only good can defeat evil. Only truth can defeat lies. Only beauty can defeat ugliness.
Your mistake is thinking that violence is inherently evil, that all violence is necessarily wrong, which is false. On matters of neutral ideas (like violence), the circumstances of the thing defines whether it is good or evil. Righteous people enacting righteous violence to stop evil is good. Evil people enacting evil violence to hurt good is an evil.
> t is a shame that the goody 2 shoes natsocs did not understand that fact.
I'm well passed the naivety of my childhood and the propaganda I was fed.
> Being an honerable knight in a world of venomous serpents in the shadows, vile serpents such as myself, is a good way to get tricked at best(most goyim), and stabbed in the back at worst(natsocs of germany).
This statement would hold weight if you truly understood what "honorable" meant, or what "good" meant, or what "evil" meant, or your inherent argument about advocacy of more evil to "combat" pedophilia, considering your previous statements.
I do not really have a counter arguement.
I would apologise for some of the grosser troll comments i made, but apologies are jewish and useless.
To forgive your family, friends, neighbors, brethren, and people is one of the highest callings and noblest of things. Without forgiveness none of us can be saved, as it's core to the Christian faith.
Jesus forgives us. Good people forgive. You hang out with bad people if they don't forgive.
Forgiveness is a necessary foundation of healthy groups, regardless of size or context. This doesn't mean crimes go unpunished, though. Forgiveness is a necessary means to engender healthy relationships, because we all err and make mistakes. Judeo-Christians use "forgiveness" to push self destructive altruism, where good people are taken advantage of over and over and over. That's not forgiveness and that's not righteous, and it's not what God has ever asked of us.
1. No one should apologize for anything they meant to do. That comes across as disingenuous, and thus jewish.
2. People only apologize because someone is mad at them and is being annoying, loud or trying to punish them. The whole point of an apology, the only reason they exist, is to get the offended, autistic nigger to stop freaking out and calm the fuck down.
Apologizes rarely function for their one and only intended purpose: being a get out of jail free card.
Ergo, fuck being "sorry".
When i am the dragon emperor of earth, anyone who tries to be a retard with me by freaking out at me and demanding an apolgy from me, I will probably consume him as my favorite breakfast, coontucky fried human.