The foundation of the soviet union was predicated upon Russia's failure to properly industrialize and their disastrous campaigns in the Russo japanese war and ww1 that left most of the population alienated from the tsar and his nobility. Yes, it was agitated by jews. They would not have been able to agitate anyone at all, however, if there were no issues to begin with. Severe issues. A large contingent of the white army was even anti-tsarist, the feeling of discontent was not strictly among the political left. Even if there weren't a single jew in russia's borders, *something* was going to happen that would not have been good for the monarchy. Maybe it would have ended up being the second xinhai revolution, who knows
What did this do for the right, then?
It was a wake-up call. By the 1920s when the bolsheviks consolidated control over the soviet union, the west was already under the jewish yoke ourselves. Just a yoke of a different variety.
Before the establishment of the USSR, the mantra for the right in opposition to globalism and jewish capitalism was, effectively, just to support reactionary monarchist political parties that had no real solutions, little popular support, and were not getting anywhere.
The USSR opened up the floodgates for new revolutionary theory to enter the right wing consciousness. Marxist (heterodox) scholars and monarchist ideologues alike started to work together and cooperate to develop new ideas to challenge the hegemony that enveloped the world, lest it fall under the dominance of leninism due to a lack of action, or remain much the same under traditional jewish finance.
And thus, thanks to the wake-up call that was the USSR's existence. We found answers. We found solutions. We overtook the political and economic paradigm of the age and challenged reaction, capitalism, liberalism, and communism all the same. And we were winning.
What happened to it? It was destroyed because it could not be allowed to exist by the jewry in charge of the 2 halves of the world. What was originally a European ideology only continued to exist in the middle east until the collapse of syria, and by some extent it somewhat exists in china and north korea today, too, but this is debatable.
What is to be done? People will need to be propagandized, and they must be propagandized properly. They must maintain their politicization to not lose faith in the movement and to continue to press on and persevere. Only through understanding the theory that gave rise to our movement will any proper governance of a revolutionary movement, and later on, a state, be achieved. So they must be educated. They must be educated on the works of Sorel, Hitler, Mussolini, Codreanu, Proudhon, Maurras, even Hegel, Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates. They must also be educated in the theories of others. Marx, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, etc. Adam Smith, Friedman, Hayek, Hoppe, Rand (ugh), etc on the opposite side. There is no harm in understanding the beliefs and theories of your enemies, this can only work in your favor. And they are also successful for a reason, so there's something to be learned in their writing while disagreeing with them.
Only through building a well educated mass movement, predicated upon violence, can any change be something that is possible.
What did this do for the right, then?
It was a wake-up call. By the 1920s when the bolsheviks consolidated control over the soviet union, the west was already under the jewish yoke ourselves. Just a yoke of a different variety.
Before the establishment of the USSR, the mantra for the right in opposition to globalism and jewish capitalism was, effectively, just to support reactionary monarchist political parties that had no real solutions, little popular support, and were not getting anywhere.
The USSR opened up the floodgates for new revolutionary theory to enter the right wing consciousness. Marxist (heterodox) scholars and monarchist ideologues alike started to work together and cooperate to develop new ideas to challenge the hegemony that enveloped the world, lest it fall under the dominance of leninism due to a lack of action, or remain much the same under traditional jewish finance.
And thus, thanks to the wake-up call that was the USSR's existence. We found answers. We found solutions. We overtook the political and economic paradigm of the age and challenged reaction, capitalism, liberalism, and communism all the same. And we were winning.
What happened to it? It was destroyed because it could not be allowed to exist by the jewry in charge of the 2 halves of the world. What was originally a European ideology only continued to exist in the middle east until the collapse of syria, and by some extent it somewhat exists in china and north korea today, too, but this is debatable.
What is to be done? People will need to be propagandized, and they must be propagandized properly. They must maintain their politicization to not lose faith in the movement and to continue to press on and persevere. Only through understanding the theory that gave rise to our movement will any proper governance of a revolutionary movement, and later on, a state, be achieved. So they must be educated. They must be educated on the works of Sorel, Hitler, Mussolini, Codreanu, Proudhon, Maurras, even Hegel, Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates. They must also be educated in the theories of others. Marx, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, etc. Adam Smith, Friedman, Hayek, Hoppe, Rand (ugh), etc on the opposite side. There is no harm in understanding the beliefs and theories of your enemies, this can only work in your favor. And they are also successful for a reason, so there's something to be learned in their writing while disagreeing with them.
Only through building a well educated mass movement, predicated upon violence, can any change be something that is possible.
You will get NOTHING done arguing that we need the right version of propaganda.
Propaganda is already widely known as spreading lies, deceiving, changing minds in questionable manners. What the MSM (jewish media) is doing is an example of that. What is known from the 20th century is also considered propaganda, especially in the Soviet Union.
It has a massive negative connotation. It's like trying to make "rape" sound good in some cases by arguing.
> So they must be educated. They must be educated on the works of Sorel, Hitler, Mussolini, Codreanu, Proudhon, Maurras, even Hegel, Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates.
Yes. See, our way is inevitable the moment a person becomes properly informed/educated. The possible conclusions converge - you cannot ignore the nigger and jewish problem. A person's opinions will range from reform, to mass deportation, to half-hearted extermination to full extermination - BUT the idea that it needs to be solved *somehow* remains core.
Our way is oh-so simple: Just tell the truth. It's amazing how simple it is. No trickery required, just the pursuit to inform people as much as possible about the things that matter the most and are therefore censored the most.
> understanding the beliefs and theories of your enemies
Yes. If you don't understand them, it can lead to them getting an edge over you. It's important however to provide the proper context.
> to be learned in their writing while disagreeing with them.
Well, it can be elaborated even. ***Why*** are they wrong? What are the logical flaws? What did they conveniently ignore?
> Only through building a well educated mass movement, predicated upon violence
People just need to understand that there is no peaceful way out. You cannot vote your way out of any of this. Violence is the logical conclusion - just do not portray it pessimistically, as if there is nothing that could be done, and as if violence is out of question.
Nothing stops propaganda from being true. But it needs to be a clear, consistent message which resonates with people, and it's possible to present actual truth without doing so.
> and it's possible to present actual truth without doing so
But why? Why not just tell the truth? The truth about jews, about niggers, about pajeets, about Democracy, about all the jewish ideologies (communism, feminism, "liberalism", etc).