It's more nuanced than you may think. We all know that marx was a jew, but marxism itself is only halfway made up of marx's jewish worldview. The other half of it comes from Engels, who was aryan. This leads to an interesting dichotomy and is likely the cause of marxism's splintering during the early days of the labor movement.
And I can categorize the splintering of marxism into 3 separate categories:
Orthodox marxism. This is the core of what marxism was originally and it has never been particularly successful. The only people who have ever really represented orthodox marxism are anarchists such as kropotkin.
Sorelian marxism. This is where it gets... weird. Georges Sorel was a French heterodox marxist thinker active in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Sorel was unique in combining marxist theory with blatant reactionary and monarchist theory. This is the variant of Marxism that spawned mussolinis fascism and therefore every third positionist movement afterwards. It played a smaller role in the formation of the 3rd type of marxism:
Leninism. Somewhere between sorelianism and classical marxism. Has more reactionary traits than orthodox marxism but fewer than sorelian marxism, and it was inspired by both. Leninism would spawn multiple cadet ideologies like stalinism, maoism, juche, etc.
What is important to understand: it can be valuable to cherry-pick the theories of Marxism in the same manner as Georges Sorel or Mussolini. Why? Because marx wasn't wrong about anything, we are currently living in the era of the fulfillment of what he wrote about in Kapital. The issue with marx was in his solution, but his and engels' predictions are very much true. The wise person sees the writing on the wall and learns from this. When you read marx you understand the problem, but it should be up to you to decide the solution for the problem.
Not really. Remember the "tyranny of the proletariat" thing? So far it only happened by jews running it and becoming the tyrants in various countries. So that didn't happen even where it was supposed to. And it didn't happen anywhere else.
> we are currently living in the era of the fulfillment
Which isn't a particularly big revelation. If you look into history, it's all about looking at the trajectory of things. This process spans multiple centuries, and namely the relative amount of peasants in countries significantly decreased, plus the industrial revolution.
Einstein also didn't invent anything - he just stole from German physicists, and was pushed by jewish media. Or why do you think a jew is known as the smartest man in existence? Because it's all jewish propaganda. The same reason why the Holocaust™ is so popular - jewish propaganda.
So let's not pretend like Marx is some kind of Nostradamus figure.
> The issue with marx was in his solution
Which is utterly retarded. Like a hippie commune that *somehow* just works, even though nobody actually works. It's effeminate nonsense. And the only way it works is if a class of people play hippie commune while there are countless men slaving away doing the real work to uphold their asses, but those who point it out get put into the gulag, because the hippie commune has to pretend it doesn't exist. And that did happen in the Soviet Union.
> When you read marx you understand the problem
I understand the problems without lobotomy. And from a perspective of today. The problems and their solutions are VERY simple to elaborate:
1. The jew is 90% cause of the problems.
2. It needs to be solved once and for all.
3. After that, and not before, we can approach actual problem solving. The jew will do everything in his power to prevent solutions. TND? Guess who'll be first in line to prevent that.