Tucker also claimed to believe the government when it said UFOs were real. Tucker is a Judas Goat who is empowered by the system to deradicalize Whites.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
22 comments:
Tucker = CIA
# 1,000%
Tucker is a Civil Relations Officer in the CIA. A propagandist. The guys job is to lead you away from the issue like a Judas Goat. Tucker is controlled opposition who NEVER attacks Israhell, he just asks the question WITH THE INTENT of diffusing any concern.
> *"Oh, it's not that Israhell controls our foreign policy, it just happened to come out that way because Israhell is, in fact, our most cooperative ally in the region. Okay, well, nothing more to see here folks. It was all just a big misunderstanding perpetrated by weird gay kids like Nick Fuentes."*
You you will NEVER hear Tucker say that we need to kick out every jewish CEO, or that we need to purge jews from our government. You will NEVER, NEVER, NEVER hear him say that. Nick says it EVERY night. That's the difference!
Tucker is a Civil Relations Officer in the CIA. A propagandist. The guys job is to lead you away from the issue like a Judas Goat. Tucker is controlled opposition who NEVER attacks Israhell, he just asks the question WITH THE INTENT of diffusing any concern.
> *"Oh, it's not that Israhell controls our foreign policy, it just happened to come out that way because Israhell is, in fact, our most cooperative ally in the region. Okay, well, nothing more to see here folks. It was all just a big misunderstanding perpetrated by weird gay kids like Nick Fuentes."*
You you will NEVER hear Tucker say that we need to kick out every jewish CEO, or that we need to purge jews from our government. You will NEVER, NEVER, NEVER hear him say that. Nick says it EVERY night. That's the difference!
To play devils advocate, he specifically said “works in conjunction with” and not “works for” the CIA.
It’s possible his dad lied to him and said he works for some other company that does work within the realm of intelligence including working with the CIA, while being a full blown agent.
Or maybe he’s just a liar. Who knows.
It’s possible his dad lied to him and said he works for some other company that does work within the realm of intelligence including working with the CIA, while being a full blown agent.
Or maybe he’s just a liar. Who knows.
Tucker was "shocked" to learn that his dad -- who he admits had CLOSE, DIRECT working relationship with the CIA was actually, in fact, employed by the CIA itself? It's a distinction without a difference.
Hey, you know that girl who used to hang around all those whores? Yeah, turns out she was a whore too. SHOCKER!
And your buddy that hangs around all those drug dealers? Turns out he's a drug dealer too. SHOCKER!
And your dad that works directly with -- BUT NOT FOR -- all those gov't mercs? Turns out he was actually a gov't merc too! Yeah, SHOCKER! 🙄
C'mon, man. And Tucker also claims to not own a TV or read social media. That's how stupid he thinks YOU are!
Hey, you know that girl who used to hang around all those whores? Yeah, turns out she was a whore too. SHOCKER!
And your buddy that hangs around all those drug dealers? Turns out he's a drug dealer too. SHOCKER!
And your dad that works directly with -- BUT NOT FOR -- all those gov't mercs? Turns out he was actually a gov't merc too! Yeah, SHOCKER! 🙄
C'mon, man. And Tucker also claims to not own a TV or read social media. That's how stupid he thinks YOU are!
yeah, given his government office positions, it's clear that he would be frequently collaborating with and liasing with the CIA on a number of issues
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Carlson#Voice_of_America
"in conjunction with" in this context, can only mean "collaborating with while still separate from", so i don't see tucker being in any way deceitful when he said that. so it seems he only later learned that his dad was actual CIA, and not just collaborating with them as chief of another agency.
I like nick but this seems like he's just intentionally missing the context for some character assassination.
i've also noticed tucker recently doing deep dives on central banking as the root of all evil, mossad's epstein blackmail operation, and i also recall a clip of him or a guest advocating that winston churchill was the chief villain of WW2
so i wouldn't exactly say tucker is being counterproductive or intentionally undermining white people. and yes i know he always adds a disclaimer about how great jews are and what a beautiful country israel is before talking about this shit, but i think he's come a long way and his character arc is far from over, he might still go full stew peters at some point. and let's face it, zion zognald doesn't like him anymore. always a good sign.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Carlson#Voice_of_America
"in conjunction with" in this context, can only mean "collaborating with while still separate from", so i don't see tucker being in any way deceitful when he said that. so it seems he only later learned that his dad was actual CIA, and not just collaborating with them as chief of another agency.
I like nick but this seems like he's just intentionally missing the context for some character assassination.
i've also noticed tucker recently doing deep dives on central banking as the root of all evil, mossad's epstein blackmail operation, and i also recall a clip of him or a guest advocating that winston churchill was the chief villain of WW2
so i wouldn't exactly say tucker is being counterproductive or intentionally undermining white people. and yes i know he always adds a disclaimer about how great jews are and what a beautiful country israel is before talking about this shit, but i think he's come a long way and his character arc is far from over, he might still go full stew peters at some point. and let's face it, zion zognald doesn't like him anymore. always a good sign.
And your buddy that hangs around all those drug dealers? Turns out he's a drug dealer too. SHOCKER!
And your dad that works directly with -- BUT NOT FOR -- all those gov't mercs? Turns out he was actually a gov't merc too! Yeah, SHOCKER! 🙄
Nick showed video of Tucker on CSPAN bragging about his dad was instrumental in overthrowing Soviet-backed gov't and inciting the Tiananmen Square protests. You think you do that kind of shit by just being a "news editor." Tucker is spitting lies in your face and your response with, "Well, acktually, that is consistent with the semantics of the claim." Quit being a fucking clown, dude.
And your dad that works directly with -- BUT NOT FOR -- all those gov't mercs? Turns out he was actually a gov't merc too! Yeah, SHOCKER! 🙄
Nick showed video of Tucker on CSPAN bragging about his dad was instrumental in overthrowing Soviet-backed gov't and inciting the Tiananmen Square protests. You think you do that kind of shit by just being a "news editor." Tucker is spitting lies in your face and your response with, "Well, acktually, that is consistent with the semantics of the claim." Quit being a fucking clown, dude.
No, his official position was associate director of the United States Information Agency:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Information_Agency
"The United States Information Agency (USIA) was a United States government agency devoted to propaganda which operated from 1953 to 1999."
that's how he would be instrumental in foreign regime change, and working in conjunction with CIA, without necessarily being CIA. I know that we see it as a distinction without a difference, but it doesn't mean tucker sees it that way when he said that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Information_Agency
"The United States Information Agency (USIA) was a United States government agency devoted to propaganda which operated from 1953 to 1999."
that's how he would be instrumental in foreign regime change, and working in conjunction with CIA, without necessarily being CIA. I know that we see it as a distinction without a difference, but it doesn't mean tucker sees it that way when he said that.
See, you don't even fucking know. Tucker has described his dad as a "news editor" and "a humble journalist." Again, like the fucking spook he is, he weaves whatever lie serves him best in whichever situation he finds himself in. Tuckers biggest mistake was going after Nick, who has all the receipts and is more connected than he lets on. I don't owe Tucker a damn thing. Why do you feel that you do?
i really don't follow tucker that much, aside from clips here and headlines there and the occasional viral tweet. i didn't even know who his dad was until 24h ago. i didn't even watch nick's full video yet, just the tweet.
but to answer your question, watching tucker from the sidelines over recent years since his departure from fox news, seeing who his guests/interviewees are, and the kind of topics of conversation he has, and how certain elements in the trump/zionist establishment are distancing themselves from him, i feel like i should give him the benefit of the doubt until i see something conclusive.
maybe there have been several smoking guns that point to him being a spook, but i still have yet to see any, and saying "in conjunction with" isn't a smoking gun, for me. anyway i'll watch nick's video later today and see if i learn something new. he already made me change my mind about candace.
but to answer your question, watching tucker from the sidelines over recent years since his departure from fox news, seeing who his guests/interviewees are, and the kind of topics of conversation he has, and how certain elements in the trump/zionist establishment are distancing themselves from him, i feel like i should give him the benefit of the doubt until i see something conclusive.
maybe there have been several smoking guns that point to him being a spook, but i still have yet to see any, and saying "in conjunction with" isn't a smoking gun, for me. anyway i'll watch nick's video later today and see if i learn something new. he already made me change my mind about candace.
Then what's the issue? Why is Tucker attacking Nick with all this petty name-calling?
"Some gay kid in his mom's basement." First of all, what's wrong with being gay in 2025? I'd hold Tuckers feet to the fire on that one. Second, which is it: does Nick "live off a dozen trusts funds" or does he live in his mom's basement? Tucker keeps switching up the accusation. Also, Nick is almost 30 years-old, so NOT a "kid." But he calls him a kid to undermine his intelligence and credibility, because Tucker is a spook trained in that.
The reason Tucker attacks Nick is because he's NOT controlled, he's NOT part of any fraternity, NOT part of any controlled opposition. Tucker NEVER attacks Israhell, he just asks the question WITH THE INTENT of diffusing any concern:
> *"Oh, it's not that Israhell controls our foreign policy, it just happened to come out that way because Israhell is, in fact, our most cooperative ally in the region. Okay, well, nothing more to see here folks. It was all just a big misunderstanding perpetrated by weird gay kids like Nick Fuentes."*
Tucker is a Civil Relations Officer in the CIA. A propagandist. The guys job is to lead you away from the issue like a Judas Goat. You you will NEVER hear Tucker say that we need to kick out every jewish CEO, or that we need to purge jews from our government. You will NEVER, NEVER, NEVER hear him say that. Nick says it EVERY night. That's the difference!
"Some gay kid in his mom's basement." First of all, what's wrong with being gay in 2025? I'd hold Tuckers feet to the fire on that one. Second, which is it: does Nick "live off a dozen trusts funds" or does he live in his mom's basement? Tucker keeps switching up the accusation. Also, Nick is almost 30 years-old, so NOT a "kid." But he calls him a kid to undermine his intelligence and credibility, because Tucker is a spook trained in that.
The reason Tucker attacks Nick is because he's NOT controlled, he's NOT part of any fraternity, NOT part of any controlled opposition. Tucker NEVER attacks Israhell, he just asks the question WITH THE INTENT of diffusing any concern:
> *"Oh, it's not that Israhell controls our foreign policy, it just happened to come out that way because Israhell is, in fact, our most cooperative ally in the region. Okay, well, nothing more to see here folks. It was all just a big misunderstanding perpetrated by weird gay kids like Nick Fuentes."*
Tucker is a Civil Relations Officer in the CIA. A propagandist. The guys job is to lead you away from the issue like a Judas Goat. You you will NEVER hear Tucker say that we need to kick out every jewish CEO, or that we need to purge jews from our government. You will NEVER, NEVER, NEVER hear him say that. Nick says it EVERY night. That's the difference!
Toast message
That interview received over a million views and segments from it were shown in countless other citizen journalist content.
And the interview wasn't held as spin control because the jewstream media lost control of the narrative.
And he did it again with his interview of Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.
Tucker has done more to jew-pill normies than anyone else I can name.
I won't criticize Tucker while he's doing God's work.
Tucker hasn’t done anything to advocate White’s take back our homeland.
He’s a stereotypical “hey I’m all for [standard globalist talking point] but by golly they better do it legally!” GenX faggot.
This might just be a tiff between the two because Nick raised legitimate concerns about Tucker which caused Tucker to became emotional like a woman.
Nick may have also been too sensational with his accusations if he's drawing slanderous conclusions based only on Tucker's father's career?
Perhaps they're both at fault and we should be focusing on the ((( enemy ))) rather than Nick and Tucker's bitchy mean-girl gossip?
( post down-vote not from me )
> *"Oh, it's not that Israhell controls our foreign policy, it just happened to come out that way because Israhell is, in fact, our most cooperative ally in the region. Okay, well, nothing more to see here folks. It was all just a big misunderstanding perpetrated by weird gay kids like Nick Fuentes."*
Tucker is a Civil Relations Officer in the CIA. A propagandist. The guys job is to lead you away from the issue like a Judas Goat. You you will NEVER hear Tucker say that we need to kick out every jewish CEO, or that we need to purge jews from our government. You will NEVER, NEVER, NEVER hear him say that. Nick says it EVERY night. That's the difference!