You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
XBX_X on scored.co
1 month ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
And your buddy that hangs around all those drug dealers? Turns out he's a drug dealer too. SHOCKER!
And your dad that works directly with -- BUT NOT FOR -- all those gov't mercs? Turns out he was actually a gov't merc too! Yeah, SHOCKER! 🙄
Nick showed video of Tucker on CSPAN bragging about his dad was instrumental in overthrowing Soviet-backed gov't and inciting the Tiananmen Square protests. You think you do that kind of shit by just being a "news editor." Tucker is spitting lies in your face and your response with, "Well, acktually, that is consistent with the semantics of the claim." Quit being a fucking clown, dude.
"The United States Information Agency (USIA) was a United States government agency devoted to propaganda which operated from 1953 to 1999."
that's how he would be instrumental in foreign regime change, and working in conjunction with CIA, without necessarily being CIA. I know that we see it as a distinction without a difference, but it doesn't mean tucker sees it that way when he said that.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)2 children
See, you don't even fucking know. Tucker has described his dad as a "news editor" and "a humble journalist." Again, like the fucking spook he is, he weaves whatever lie serves him best in whichever situation he finds himself in. Tuckers biggest mistake was going after Nick, who has all the receipts and is more connected than he lets on. I don't owe Tucker a damn thing. Why do you feel that you do?
i really don't follow tucker that much, aside from clips here and headlines there and the occasional viral tweet. i didn't even know who his dad was until 24h ago. i didn't even watch nick's full video yet, just the tweet.
but to answer your question, watching tucker from the sidelines over recent years since his departure from fox news, seeing who his guests/interviewees are, and the kind of topics of conversation he has, and how certain elements in the trump/zionist establishment are distancing themselves from him, i feel like i should give him the benefit of the doubt until i see something conclusive.
maybe there have been several smoking guns that point to him being a spook, but i still have yet to see any, and saying "in conjunction with" isn't a smoking gun, for me. anyway i'll watch nick's video later today and see if i learn something new. he already made me change my mind about candace.
And your dad that works directly with -- BUT NOT FOR -- all those gov't mercs? Turns out he was actually a gov't merc too! Yeah, SHOCKER! 🙄
Nick showed video of Tucker on CSPAN bragging about his dad was instrumental in overthrowing Soviet-backed gov't and inciting the Tiananmen Square protests. You think you do that kind of shit by just being a "news editor." Tucker is spitting lies in your face and your response with, "Well, acktually, that is consistent with the semantics of the claim." Quit being a fucking clown, dude.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Information_Agency
"The United States Information Agency (USIA) was a United States government agency devoted to propaganda which operated from 1953 to 1999."
that's how he would be instrumental in foreign regime change, and working in conjunction with CIA, without necessarily being CIA. I know that we see it as a distinction without a difference, but it doesn't mean tucker sees it that way when he said that.
tucker is a fucking glowie after all lmao, my bad
but to answer your question, watching tucker from the sidelines over recent years since his departure from fox news, seeing who his guests/interviewees are, and the kind of topics of conversation he has, and how certain elements in the trump/zionist establishment are distancing themselves from him, i feel like i should give him the benefit of the doubt until i see something conclusive.
maybe there have been several smoking guns that point to him being a spook, but i still have yet to see any, and saying "in conjunction with" isn't a smoking gun, for me. anyway i'll watch nick's video later today and see if i learn something new. he already made me change my mind about candace.