New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
66
Barstool Sports jew (media.scored.co)
posted 9 months ago by WhitemaleHH on scored.co (+1 / -0 / +65Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
MysteriousFedKnight on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 3 children
Romans thought the same. Stop appropriating their salute already, maggot.
Erase99 on scored.co
9 months ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
Reply to this post 6 million times or your rabbi will die of GRIDS.
MysteriousFedKnight on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Roman women typically married in their early teens, often between 12 and 15 years old, though some might marry earlier or later. Men generally married in their mid-twenties. This meant that Roman mothers were often much younger than their husbands. Childbirth was a high-risk venture, and infant and child mortality rates were high, but women could still have many children

https://www.google.com/search?q=roman+mothers+age
BlueDrache on scored.co
9 months ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
Interesting bit of false equivocation, there heebbie.
MysteriousFedKnight on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Roman women typically married in their early teens, often between 12 and 15 years old, though some might marry earlier or later. Men generally married in their mid-twenties. This meant that Roman mothers were often much younger than their husbands. Childbirth was a high-risk venture, and infant and child mortality rates were high, but women could still have many children

https://www.google.com/search?q=roman+mothers+age
BlueDrache on scored.co
9 months ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Die in a fire, pedo.
MysteriousFedKnight on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Same, larper.
ApexVeritas on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I can understand trying to explore history, but why use the word "maggot" here? It immediately sets the tone that you defend jewish pedophilia and hate ConPro.
MysteriousFedKnight on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
It had to be faggot, but autocorrect decided for me and i was lazy. In the end it is similar lol

I'm not exploring history, i don't support the roman way because romans although it does have a pull on me. I support it because it's the natural way.

14y old girls will fuck something in the end without societal shaming and even then. You can choose it's a 20-25 year old boy who passed some tests in life, with the desire to impregnate or you can have her pair, at best, with a boy who yet doesn't know how he will turn out and will hesitate impregnating for long. It's a loser bet socially, and by the way nowadays they just run themselves with 'alpha' clowns and nigs even.

Fucking and impregnating a 14y old virgin is also how you unleash the beast in males. They will scream battlescreams and run on a horse into a thousand if required. Nowadays most our guys are kind of depressed and useless because there is no such treasure to their potential efforts.

When you discard human nature for a dogma you are in for a disappointment.

The guy in the pic want something extremely different from me: to randomly fuck 14y olds. I mean, instead, for young but older guys to be able to fuck them with intent, for breeding, to keep them around, busy and happy and loyal to their biological cause.

I don't hate conpro, but some stuff from christianity i find really awkward and counter productive to the cause. Which to me is the white race and not christianity. It's a very serious topic imo, and i dont want to falter just because muh average dogmatically induced feelings.
ApexVeritas on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Thanks for confirming who you are.
Toast message