(((Seidel)))
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
One can see how weak his argument is by framing it another way:
>The only way to have freedom OF food choice is to have freedom FROM food choice.
>You can't have freedom OF car brands unless you have freedom FROM car brands.
>You can't have the freedom of choosing whether or not to embrace zionism without having freedom from zionism.
Furthermore, the question of whether or not Christian Nationalism is "un-American" is irrelevant. Plenty goes on inside the USA today that is un-American, such as the admission of non-Whites as citizens, overreach on the part of the federal government, jewish nationalism and supremacism as law, etc. There's no reason in particular why "Christian Nationalism" should be singled out when plenty of other things happen that are obviously unconstitutional.
Separating church and state does not mean the state MUST be atheist. It just means there's no /official/ religion.
The intent was even more basic: "The Church of England was not awesome. Let's not repeat that mistake."