You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
devotech2 on scored.co
9 months ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
I am familiar with truthvids already.
I fully believe that the israelites were white and that they went to Europe in exile.
I do not believe, however, that they, alone, populated Europe.
Was Europe just a desolate wasteland full of cavemen, or nothing, before the israelites showed up and populated it?
No. It most certainly was not.
Where the fuck did japheth go then? Did he disappear into the æther? Europeans fulfill the exact promise Noah made to japheth to the letter.
Why are the scythians mentioned and described as japhetites in the old testament? Why are all the tribes of Japheth in general in the old testament located in the exact areas that the real life indo Europeans lived in (namely Asia minor) ?
But I fully support the idea that the israelites went to Europe, that they became people of nobility and note, perhaps founded civilizations. But the timelines don't make a damned bit of sense when compared to archeology if you consider them to be the sole progenitors of Europeans. There's also the language issue, in that european languages are not remotely close to Hebrew. The indo Europeans predate exodus by thousands of years. They predate egypt. They predate sumer. The middle east was still made up of little farming villages of no archeological record when the indo european culture started its genesis.
I fully believe that the israelites were white and that they went to Europe in exile.
I do not believe, however, that they, alone, populated Europe.
Was Europe just a desolate wasteland full of cavemen, or nothing, before the israelites showed up and populated it?
No. It most certainly was not.
Where the fuck did japheth go then? Did he disappear into the æther? Europeans fulfill the exact promise Noah made to japheth to the letter.
Why are the scythians mentioned and described as japhetites in the old testament? Why are all the tribes of Japheth in general in the old testament located in the exact areas that the real life indo Europeans lived in (namely Asia minor) ?
But I fully support the idea that the israelites went to Europe, that they became people of nobility and note, perhaps founded civilizations. But the timelines don't make a damned bit of sense when compared to archeology if you consider them to be the sole progenitors of Europeans. There's also the language issue, in that european languages are not remotely close to Hebrew. The indo Europeans predate exodus by thousands of years. They predate egypt. They predate sumer. The middle east was still made up of little farming villages of no archeological record when the indo european culture started its genesis.