New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
As some of us suspected, "pope" Leo seems to be pretending to be a "traditional Catholic" and "conservative", while attacking the Catholic faith and arguably presenting himself more clearly as not Catholic, nor as a Catholic pope.

Apparently in a recent "papal" message he said:

> However, when we read the account of what is commonly called the “multiplication of the loaves” (cf. Mt 14:13-21; Mk 6:30-44; Lk 9:12-17; Jn 6:1-13), we realize that the real miracle performed by Christ was to show that the key to overcoming hunger lies in sharing rather than in greedily hoarding.

Catholics believe the "real miracle" of the multiplication of the loaves, was an actual supernatural miracle where a few loaves of bread physically became many more loaves of bread. To suggest the "real miracle" of this story, is that Christ was helping the hungry and was displaying a virtue of being charitable, seems as an indirect denial of the belief in the tangible supernatural miracle that took place in the story.

We would not expect a Catholic or pope to say such a thing.

Credit to this link for the story (note that I may not always agree with NOW's analyses but they are usually correct, although I'd personally "police" their "tone" a bit more maybe): https://novusordowatch.org/2025/06/leo14-christs-real-miracle-sharing-loaves/
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
bluewhiteandred on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Well, I don't consider "Leo" to be a pope or a Catholic, which I tried to make clear in the OP (that's my "cope", I guess). So I don't consider his actions to be representative of Catholicism, but a "taken over fake form of 'Catholicism'"

That being said, Catholicism does seem to take a moderate view on things like "inter-racial marriage" and immigration (it permits them).

Granted, the leftist view of things seems to encourage inter-racial marriage as a worthy-pursuit-in-itself and immigration-as-a-displacement-weapon. Neither of these are Catholic positions.

What was normal and standard in the past was some inter-racial marriage and some immigration, as a minority position, with the majority marrying of their own ethnic / racial makeup, and with there being less immigration going on.

I think the Church would especially frown upon non-Christian immigrants being used as weapons to break up "Christian" society. Certainly Catholics for example were encouraged to only marry Catholics (which is one of the six commandments of the Church).

u/multiformat u/XBX_X
Zrupsloohg on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The biggest priority should be to work towards a future where Whites can flourish. As I mentioned before, Christianity is a "big tent" religion that accepts without much discrimination. Opposing non-Christian migrants only goes so far before you find yourself opening up to groups such as Mexicans, Haitians, South Koreans, Filipinos, Indonesians and et cetera.

Them being Christian doesn't even guarantee that they still won't conflict with one another or other White populations. Look to the Latin Massacres, the Sack of Constantinople, or the countless examples of Christian nations siding with or aiding the Ottomans.

Christianity and Christian Nationalism was never the answer to preserve Whites and Our future. It's the hard unfortunate Truth.
Toast message