Believing God Exists =/= Following His Word
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
I find a lot of inconsistencies regarding them in particular.
Why is it that the actual natives of the area, who are, in some cases, of 90% canaanite blood (the Lebanese) to at least of 60% canaanite blood, the most devout believers of God in the middle east?
The ones with the most canaanite blood are, in fact, the *most* devout believers. Lebanon, "Phoenicia", is half Christian, the most in the region. The more "canaanite" the person is, the more Christian they are. As a general rule. The more Christian and "canaanite" they are, the more they are hardly distinguishable from a European, but the less they look like an Israeli.
And many of these people are fully white in appearance. Aryan, even. They do not look remotely as ghoulish as the jews to their south. The more "caananite" they are, the more European they look. Not even close to the jews. Lebanon, the people of which are almost entirely Phoenician, is the whitest country in the middle east bar none.
But the jews have little native canaanite dna in relation to this area. The jews carry a different y-dna haplogroup (a middle eastern one, but not a canaanite one). Actually, their y dna haplogroup is most common in Northwest Africa. Nowhere near the levant. The Phoenicians had haplogroup r1b and j2 (very white haplogroups, consistent with the israelites themselves).
If the jews are canaanites, why are they so different from the people who actually are the children of the Phoenicians, hurrians, et al? Furthermore, why were the full blooded canaanites around them the most willing to convert to the teachings of Christ? Why are they fighting the jews?
Something does NOT add up here, and I think there are many lies about who the canaanites actually were. Not necessarily in scripture, but I believe that we are being told lies by academics about who the canaanites were.
Either: the Phoenicians were *not* canaanites, and were very much related to the israelites, or the biblical canaanites are being conflated with an entirely different group of people who were not of them, which is exactly what is happening with the hittites (the biblical hittites were probably the hurrians. The historical hittites have no ties to the region whatsoever, not even speaking a remotely related language, but they are conflated with the biblical hittites regardless. The historical hittites were indo europeans, not even close to being a descendant of ham let alone canaan, but the biblical hittites were canaanites)
Did the jews absorb a population which was effectively a "ghost"? Do they now lie about this? The jews most certainly mixed with a non-jewish population, and this caused their downfall. The Bible clearly states this. But were these people that the Bible calls canaanites the "historical" canaanites?