New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
posted 9 months ago by genesisSOC on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
genesisSOC on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The moment Catholicism (and Orthodox) allowed non-Whites into the Church, they fell to the jewish gates of hell and Martin Luther (as flawed as he was) saved Christianity by keeping the promise made to Saint Peter.
Erase99 on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
??? Peter wasn't White and he was the first pope. There have been thousands of non-White priests, bishops, patriarchs, as in the East, without any problems other than that experienced by Whites who have our own set of perverts, non-believers, corruptors, simonists, etc.
genesisSOC on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
What do you mean Peter wasn't White? He, like all the Israelites, was White. There were no non-White priests, bishiops or otherwise clergy in Catholicism until about 1500 AD when the jesuits subverted it, and Orthodoxy even before that. Do you even know basic history like the Behistun Rock, Assyrian Tablets and pharaoh DNA???
Erase99 on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
No Israelites were White. They were Arabs, like Abraham, who was from Iraq. Europeans are Japhethites. Hebrews are Shemites. https://imgur.com/df8g6JA
European culture is nothing like ancient Near/Middle East culture. The only reason why anyone thinks Hebrews are pale skinned, is because Ashkenazis, who are levantine nomads, have been breeding with Europeans for centuries. The Greeks and Romans never saw levantines as fellow Europeans. Not sure why this is difficult to understand.
Kopkot on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Its pretty typical for people to try and claim being the muh real Hebrews when really genetic differences between semites and europeans appear to predate the biblical period by millennia
genesisSOC on scored.co
9 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Everything you've said is factually wrong lmao. Here's why:\
https://i.ibb.co/x87q6VNL/5.png \
https://i.ibb.co/dwJ3wwqp/15.png \
https://i.ibb.co/p6D072gF/6.png \
https://i.ibb.co/29rHFkz/7.png \
https://www.associationcovenantpeople.org/the-behistun-inscription/ \
https://i.ibb.co/21gWSP0x/34324.jpg \
https://www.amazon.com/Who-Esau-Edom-Charles-Weisman/dp/1929205007 \
"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142) \
Let's not forget Song of Solomon 5:10 and Lamentations 4:7 describing the Israelites as White skinned, nor all the ancient surviving mosaics of the Israelites, Apostles and Jesus including King David all as having White skinned. The ashkenazi/khazarians joined the edomites around 700 AD. Judaism started in 300 AD with the writing of the talmud. The Greeks and Romans were the tribes of Dan, Levi and Zebulon who left for Europe and America after Exodus but before Jesus and were prophesied to regress into paganism. Paul's message was to remind them they were Israelites and eligible for salvation through Jesus. It never applied to non-Whites. The only non-Whites in the "Levant" were Philistines (Palestenians), Edomites (jews), Canaanites (those that Esau race mixed to create jews), and Satyrs (Arabs). So Israel was completely White before we migrated from it to Europe after Christ's resurrection, just as the Behistun rock explains in THREE SEPARATE LANGUAGES, not to mention the Assyrian Tablets. Stop falling for jewish lies to give way your birthright to them. Europeans come from Arphaxad, who was from Shem. Japheth's son Javan only was a very small portion of the Ionian Greeks, while his other sons became Medes, Thracians, Tubali and Moschi.
Erase99 on scored.co
9 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
WRONG.

The Greeks and Romans have nothing to do with Dan, Levi, or Zebulon. When St Paul preached to the Greeks, he said he was talking to Gentiles (non-Hebrews) who, by definition, are not of Abraham. This is why the maxim "to the Jew first, and then the Gentile" was satisfied when the Hebrews rejected the Gospel. This is what happened:
>Then Paul and Barnabas said boldly: To you it behoved us first to speak the word of God: but because you reject it, and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold we turn to the Gentiles.

That's Acts 13:46. Who did Paul start preaching to? Romans and Greeks! The actions and words of St Paul make no sense if what you're saying is true.

The Lord Jesus Christ commanded:

>Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.

That's Matthew 28:19-20. God himself has commanded that his Good News be preached to all races of men and all nations. This idea that non-Europeans are excluded from it is stupid and without any basis in Scripture or Tradition. Furthermore, it makes a mockery of the many saints who have given their lives preaching to men from every single tribe, race, and nation on this earth.
Toast message