There are ways of making a pack, it just has to be done intelligently. (((They))) have deliberately made AI retarded and are creating blind-spots in its programming, and AI still requires competent people to actually be useful.
> There are ways of making a pack, it just has to be done intelligently.
It is literally impossible. There are too many liabilities, and just one being caught ruins it for the group. The whole reason the 'packs' that exist do everything 'legally' is because 'legal' is all that a group can do with even a somewhat reasonable chance at success.
> (((They))) have deliberately made AI retarded
You mean large language models. The tiny models that track your beliefs and intents perform 'sentiment analysis', and they are highly refined and generally without fault now. You can run open-source ones on your cpu if you don't believe me.
The tech dates back to at least 2012, and this is just what is publicly admitted to. This site says it's been around since the early 2000s: https://zenpulsar.com/news/tpost/5h9c8xbti1-evolution-of-sentiment-analysis-from-bas
As of now, its all opt in, and there are easy ways of falsifying sentiment. And besides, any group using the web or phones for communications is retarded unless they *want* to be spied on.
> and there are easy ways of falsifying sentiment.
The problem is that falsifying sentiment adds noise to the signal - the only way to get around it is to make it hard for the humans who you talk to as well. ... This was the original problem. The new problem is that for at least 11 years sentiment bots have been trained on sarcasm, which inadvertently made them where they can go over your whole profile and sus out your actual beliefs, even if you never explicitly stated them.
> And besides, any group using the web or phones for communications is retarded
Ongoing communications is only part of the puzzle. Just like with encryption, the handshake is always in the open, and so is the initial meet. Who you meet with is more important, and good luck finding 'an active club' or anything even remotely related without leaving a trace of some sort.
The pack is the problem, the methods of organization have all been infected, and AI is making it even harder.
Lone wolves are the only ways to get anything done, and will be forever more.
It is literally impossible. There are too many liabilities, and just one being caught ruins it for the group. The whole reason the 'packs' that exist do everything 'legally' is because 'legal' is all that a group can do with even a somewhat reasonable chance at success.
> (((They))) have deliberately made AI retarded
You mean large language models. The tiny models that track your beliefs and intents perform 'sentiment analysis', and they are highly refined and generally without fault now. You can run open-source ones on your cpu if you don't believe me.
The tech dates back to at least 2012, and this is just what is publicly admitted to. This site says it's been around since the early 2000s: https://zenpulsar.com/news/tpost/5h9c8xbti1-evolution-of-sentiment-analysis-from-bas
The problem is that falsifying sentiment adds noise to the signal - the only way to get around it is to make it hard for the humans who you talk to as well. ... This was the original problem. The new problem is that for at least 11 years sentiment bots have been trained on sarcasm, which inadvertently made them where they can go over your whole profile and sus out your actual beliefs, even if you never explicitly stated them.
> And besides, any group using the web or phones for communications is retarded
Ongoing communications is only part of the puzzle. Just like with encryption, the handshake is always in the open, and so is the initial meet. Who you meet with is more important, and good luck finding 'an active club' or anything even remotely related without leaving a trace of some sort.