Consume Product

it's society telling you what they think of you. women do not see the bottom 80% of men as even human. they're tools to be used and disposed of.

patriarchy was our solution to this. a recognition that men do everything, provide everything, and they have earned themselves a reasonable and humane deal.

women deserve less.

want to talk about degeneracy? have you ever spoken with a modern women, ever? that's what's so frustrating about the trad larpers. they are so inexperienced and naive about women but they climb up on their moral high horse and shame men for wanting to be treated as a human with the very minimum of value in society. all while putting these whores up on pedestals.

In a society of coomers and simps

Some fucking celibacy is actually a good thing

Tacitus wrote how Germans preserved themselves for marriage and punished "early sex" with either banishment or exile (this applied to men as well)

Meanwhile Rome was a bastion of depravity because slavery, you want some pussy? Just head to the slave market and take your pick

Whoredom was also rampant (was sold openly near arenas and chariot racing stadiums) it literally required the govt to intervene and force women to become mothers

Not because they cared about *le hecking trad values*, but because they needed more men for their wars of conquest

"Basement" is a feature that is absent from 99% of poor people's houses. If you've got a basement you can find a woman.

The whole idea is as garbage as "trans": here's a bunch words, you have to use them **my way** from now on.

> that women are and have always been materialistic and selfish, choosing the best men to breed with

Which is totally fine. It shouldn't be any different even.

The problem is that due to various factors, women indulge in hedonism, and so are the men they engage with. It's much more difficult for those who want actual relationship and family, not just hollow, transient pleasure via sex.

The men labeled mediocre aren't bad even. They may be fine husbands and fathers, possibly even great at that. But women do not pursue values that make men good husbands and fathers, but instead pursue factors like physical attraction and income. They overvalue their own physical attractiveness and indulge in being lazy fuck mattresses, and believe that's the height of the value they bring into a relationship.

Well, not all women of course, but there is a significant shift.

why should I even care about women?

never forget that 99.999% of *actual* incels are pajeets and chinks

They don't use the term because it's purely logical, they use it precisely because it pisses you off. The best answer is to just own it, kind of like how the Chudjak meme has been embraced by the right.

>An involuntary celibate (INCEL) gets no pussy, because he's ugly/physically undesirable.

Hey hey hey! Ugly *AND* poor. Ugly rich guys get pussy just fine.

>women are and have always been materialistic and selfish, choosing the best men to breed with. You don't need to be an incel to know that.

And men are superficial and selfish, choosing the best women to breed with. This is the way of the world, not esoteric knowledge.

They use it because they know it pisses you off. The reality is yes, there are poor bastards who are so awkward, strange looking, and poor that they’ll likely never get anything, or at least anything they desire, without paying. With all that said, the reason THEY use the term because they’re angry that more “marketable” normal, and even high tier men are not falling for the kiked system anymore. This is their main issue.

We need patriarchy. women have gone off the reservation